查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
歐盟綠色交易- 歐洲/其他國家智慧農業市場影響分析 - 全球與區域分析：貿易影響、永續目標、國家分析（2020-2024）
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1566312

歐盟綠色交易- 歐洲/其他國家智慧農業市場影響分析 - 全球與區域分析：貿易影響、永續目標、國家分析（2020-2024）

EU Green Deal - Impact Analysis on Europe/Other Countries Smart Agriculture Market - A Regional and Global Analysis: Focus on Trade Impact, Sustainable Development Goals, and Country - Analysis, 2020-2024
出版日期: | 出版商: BIS Research | 英文 99 Pages | 商品交期: 1-5個工作天內

價格

在歐盟綠色交易和全球氣候行動的推動下，智慧農業市場有望實現顯著成長，這些行動強調了永續和有彈性的農業實踐的必要性。

透過整合精密農業、物聯網、無人機和人工智慧等先進技術，智慧農業提高生產力和效率，同時最大限度地減少對環境的影響。這個市場對於支持歐盟減少溫室氣體排放和扭轉生物多樣性喪失的目標至關重要。智慧農業不僅最佳化資源利用，還透過節水灌溉、改善牲畜管理和採用耐氣候作物來增強對氣候變遷的抵禦能力。它透過提高產量和促進永續農業實踐，在解決糧食和營養不安全問題方面發揮關鍵作用。世界銀行等機構增加的投資顯示該部門在轉變全球農業糧食系統、實現氣候變遷目標以及促進經濟成長和農村發展方面至關重要。

歐盟綠色交易的實施對智慧農業市場產生了重大影響，推動了產業的顯著成長和創新。優先考慮永續性和氣候適應能力的綠色交易正在創造對精密農業、物聯網和人工智慧等先進農業技術的強勁需求。這種向永續實踐的轉變正在加速智慧農業解決方案的採用，從而提高生產力、減少環境影響並提高資源效率。參與這些技術開發和部署的行業可能會經歷投資增加和市場擴張。 《綠色交易》的重點是減少溫室氣體排放和促進生物多樣性，也將智慧農業定位為實現這些目標的關鍵部門。因此，預計該市場將增加對氣候智慧型農業實踐的研究、開發和採用，從而推動全球經濟成長並向更永續農業的過渡。

本報告探討了全球智慧農業市場和歐盟綠色交易的影響，概述了歐盟綠色交易、其帶來的挑戰和機遇，並對主要智慧農業國家進行了分析。

目標國家

  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 智利
  • 秘魯
  • 南非
  • 沙烏地阿拉伯
  • UAE
  • 埃及
  • 土耳其
  • 以色列
  • 韓國
  • 越南
  • 中國
  • 日本
  • 新加坡
  • 澳洲
  • 紐西蘭

主要企業：

  • Bayer Crop Sciences
  • Nestle SA
  • Yara
  • BASF SE
  • Trimble Inc.

目錄

執行摘要

第1章 市場

  • 歐盟綠色交易概述
    • 概述
    • 市場定義
    • 從農場到餐桌的策略：行動計劃
    • 歐盟糧食生產：自給率分析
  • 動力學
    • 農業綠色交易：2030 年目標
    • 高永續性標準對全球貿易的影響
    • 歐盟綠色交易對歐盟農藥使用的影響
    • 實施歐盟農業綠色交易的企業情景
  • 歐盟綠色交易實施情形分析
    • 對有機景觀的影響
    • 對溫室氣體排放的影響：依農業部門
  • 永續發展目標對歐洲的影響
    • EU
    • 非歐盟地區
  • 盈利分析：在不同農場規模實施智慧農業
    • 數位化技術在規模化農場的應用
    • 數位技術在中型農場的實施
    • 數位技術在小型農場的實施
    • 整個農場盈利分析

第2章 國家

  • 從歐盟進口農產品和投入品的國家：影響分析
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 秘魯
    • 南非
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • UAE
    • 埃及
    • 土耳其
    • 以色列
    • 韓國
    • 越南
    • 中國
    • 日本
    • 新加坡
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
  • 結論/建議
    • 建議
  • 歐盟綠色交易的未來藍圖

第3章調查方法

Product Code: AGA1390SB

Introduction to the EU Green Deal

The European Union's Green Deal is a bold initiative aimed at achieving a climate-neutral and sustainable Europe by 2050. Central to this vision are the Farm-to-Fork (F2F) and Biodiversity strategies, which seek to create a food system that benefits the environment, enhances food security, and ensures fair economic returns. Key targets include reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 55%, cutting chemical pesticide use by 50%, and increasing organic farming to 25% of agricultural land by 2030. The EU is also integrating sustainability into its trade policies, introducing mirror clauses that require imported agricultural products to meet EU production standards. While these measures could impact low-income developing countries, the EU is committed to balancing its internal goals with global sustainable development, ensuring its leadership in promoting sustainable practices worldwide.

Market Introduction

The smart agriculture market is poised for significant growth, driven by the European Union Green Deal and global climate initiatives that emphasize the need for sustainable and resilient farming practices. By integrating advanced technologies such as precision farming, IoT, drones, and AI, smart agriculture enhances productivity and efficiency while minimizing environmental impact. This market is critical in supporting the EU's goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and reversing biodiversity loss. Smart agriculture not only optimizes resource use but also promotes climate resilience through water-efficient irrigation, improved livestock management, and the adoption of climate-resistant crops. It plays a vital role in addressing food and nutrition insecurity by improving yields and promoting sustainable farming practices. The increasing investment by entities such as the World Bank underscores the sector's importance in transforming the global agrifood system, aligning with climate goals, and fostering economic growth and rural development.

Industrial Impact

The implementation of the EU Green Deal is set to impact the smart agriculture market significantly, driving substantial industrial growth and innovation. By prioritizing sustainability and climate resilience, the Green Deal creates a strong demand for advanced agricultural technologies, including precision farming, IoT, and AI. This shift toward sustainable practices accelerates the adoption of smart agriculture solutions that enhance productivity, reduce environmental impact, and improve resource efficiency. Industries involved in the development and deployment of these technologies are likely to experience increased investment and market expansion. Furthermore, the Green Deal's emphasis on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting biodiversity positions smart agriculture as a key sector in achieving these goals. As a result, the market is expected to see heightened activity in research, development, and the implementation of climate-smart practices, driving both economic growth and the transition to a more sustainable agricultural industry across the globe.

Countries Considered:

  • U.S.
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • Brazil
  • Chile
  • Peru
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • U.A.E.
  • Egypt
  • Turkey
  • Israel
  • South Korea
  • Vietnam
  • China
  • Japan
  • Singapore
  • Australia
  • New Zealand

Recent developments of the EU Green Deal:

  • In January 2024, Trimble launched the Connected Climate Exchange, a groundbreaking carbon marketplace designed to support the European Union's Green Deal by advancing sustainability in the agriculture sector. This platform bridges the gap between farmers, agronomists, and businesses, facilitating the aggregation and verification of data across the agricultural supply chain. By integrating with existing farm management tools, Trimble ensures that sustainability efforts are both scalable and measurable, thereby contributing significantly to the EU's broader goals of achieving climate neutrality by 2050.
  • In November 2023, the EU and Canada established a Green Alliance to strengthen cooperation on climate action, environmental protection, and green technology. This partnership will accelerate the adoption of climate-resilient practices, nature-based solutions, and innovative technologies in Canada, enhancing agricultural sustainability.
  • In April 2023, the World Bank approved a $345 million loan to support China's Green Agricultural and Rural Revitalization Program, enhancing sustainability in Hubei and Hunan provinces, alongside a US$4.1 billion commitment from the Chinese government.

How can this report add value to an organization?

Innovation Strategy: This offers insights into various methods and practices that align with the EU Green Deal's sustainability objectives. By gaining a comprehensive understanding of the smart agriculture market and evaluating the challenges and opportunities presented by the EU Green Deal, stakeholders in the leading countries importing agricultural goods from the EU can assess the potential impact on their respective nations and organizations.

Growth/Marketing Strategy: The smart agriculture market has witnessed significant advancements driven by key players through product launches, innovations, business expansions, and strategic collaborations. Companies are increasingly forming partnerships, collaborations, and joint ventures with major EU-based firms to meet EU standards, expand their operations, and reach a wider customer base. For instance, in April 2023, the Swiss company PLNTZ announced the cultivation of 15 hectares of EU-certified hemp varieties in Austria, aimed at extracting flowers, CBD, and other fibers.

Competitive Strategy: The report provides an analysis and profiling of key countries within the smart agriculture market that import agricultural products from the EU. Additionally, it thoroughly examines the challenges and opportunities in these countries, enabling readers to understand how market players compare, thereby presenting a clear view of the competitive landscape.

Research Methodology

Factors

  • The scope of this report focuses on the EU Green Deal and its implementation in Europe and other countries' smart agriculture markets.
  • The base currency considered for the market analysis is US$. Currencies other than the US$ have been converted to the US$ for all statistical calculations, considering the average conversion rate for that particular year.
  • The currency conversion rate has been taken from the historical exchange rate of the FxTop website.
  • Nearly all the recent developments from January 2021 to August 2024 have been considered in this research study.
  • The information rendered in the report is a result of in-depth primary interviews, surveys, and secondary analysis.
  • Where relevant information was not available, proxy indicators and extrapolation were employed.
  • Technologies currently used are expected to persist, with no major breakthroughs.

Secondary Research

This research study of the EU Green Deal involves extensive secondary research, directories, company websites, and annual reports. It also makes use of databases, such as ITU, Hoovers, Bloomberg, Businessweek, and Factiva, to collect useful and effective information for an extensive, technical, market-oriented study.

Some of the prominent names in this market are:

  • Bayer Crop Sciences
  • Nestle S.A.
  • Yara
  • BASF SE
  • Trimble Inc.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1 Markets

  • 1.1 EU Green Deal Overview
    • 1.1.1 European Union Green Deal: An Introduction
    • 1.1.2 Market Definition
    • 1.1.3 Farm-to-Fork Strategy: Action Plan
      • 1.1.3.1 Building a Food Chain that Benefits Consumers, Producers, Climate, and the Environment
        • 1.1.3.1.1 Sustainable Food Production
          • 1.1.3.1.1.1 New Business Model
          • 1.1.3.1.1.2 Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
          • 1.1.3.1.1.3 Nutrient Losses
          • 1.1.3.1.1.4 Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)
          • 1.1.3.1.1.5 Organic Food Market
          • 1.1.3.1.1.6 Eco-Schemes
          • 1.1.3.1.1.7 Sustainable Fish and Seafood Cultivation
        • 1.1.3.1.2 Ensuring Food Security
        • 1.1.3.1.3 Encouraging Sustainable Food Processing, Retail, Wholesale, and Hospitality Services
        • 1.1.3.1.4 Fostering Transition to a Sustainable Diet and Encouraging the Consumption of Sustainable Food
        • 1.1.3.1.5 Minimizing Food Loss and Waste
        • 1.1.3.1.6 Preventing Food Fraud along the Food Supply Chain
      • 1.1.3.2 Making the Transition Possible
        • 1.1.3.2.1 Investments, Technology, Research, and Innovation
        • 1.1.3.2.2 Consultancy Services, Knowledge Exchange, and Skills
      • 1.1.3.3 Promoting the Transition Globally
    • 1.1.4 European Union Food Production: Self-Sufficiency Analysis
      • 1.1.4.1 High Self-Sufficiency in Animal Products
      • 1.1.4.2 Varying Self-Sufficiency in Arable Crops
      • 1.1.4.3 Self-Sufficiency in Fruit and Vegetables
  • 1.2 Dynamics
    • 1.2.1 Green Deal for Agriculture: Targets for 2030
      • 1.2.1.1 Research Studies by Agriculture Institutions
    • 1.2.2 Global Trade Impacts of High Sustainability Standards
    • 1.2.3 Impact of EU Green Deal on Pesticide Usage in the EU
    • 1.2.4 Corporate Scenario for the Implementation of the EU Green Deal in Agriculture
      • 1.2.4.1 Companies Implementing EU Green Deal Policies
      • 1.2.4.2 Investment Landscape for the Implementation of the EU Green Deal
  • 1.3 Implementation Analysis of EU Green Deal
    • 1.3.1 Impact on Organic Farming Landscape
    • 1.3.2 Impact on GHG Emissions by the Agriculture Sector
  • 1.4 Impact of Sustainable Development Goals in Europe
    • 1.4.1 European Union
      • 1.4.1.1 Role of Smart Farming Service Providers in the EU
    • 1.4.2 Non-EU Regions
      • 1.4.2.1 Role of Smart Farming Service Providers in the Non-EU Countries
  • 1.5 Profitability Analysis: Smart Farming Adoption across Different Farm Sizes
    • 1.5.1 Digital Technology Adoption in Large Farms
    • 1.5.2 Digital Technology Adoption in Medium Size Farms
    • 1.5.3 Digital Technology Adoption in Small Farms
    • 1.5.4 Profitability Analysis across Farms

2 Countries

  • 2.1 Countries Importing Agricultural Produce and Inputs from the European Union: Impact Analysis
    • 2.1.1 U.S.
      • 2.1.1.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in the U.S.
    • 2.1.2 Canada
      • 2.1.2.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Canada
    • 2.1.3 Mexico
      • 2.1.3.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Mexico
    • 2.1.4 Brazil
      • 2.1.4.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Brazil
    • 2.1.5 Chile
      • 2.1.5.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Chile
    • 2.1.6 Peru
      • 2.1.6.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Peru
    • 2.1.7 South Africa
      • 2.1.7.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in South Africa
    • 2.1.8 Saudi Arabia
      • 2.1.8.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
    • 2.1.9 U.A.E.
      • 2.1.9.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in the U.A.E.
    • 2.1.10 Egypt
      • 2.1.10.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Egypt
    • 2.1.11 Turkey
      • 2.1.11.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Turkey
    • 2.1.12 Israel
      • 2.1.12.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Israel
    • 2.1.13 South Korea
      • 2.1.13.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in South Korea
    • 2.1.14 Vietnam
      • 2.1.14.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Vietnam
    • 2.1.15 China
      • 2.1.15.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in China
    • 2.1.16 Japan
      • 2.1.16.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Japan
    • 2.1.17 Singapore
      • 2.1.17.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Singapore
    • 2.1.18 Australia
      • 2.1.18.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Australia
    • 2.1.19 New Zealand
      • 2.1.19.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in New Zealand
  • 2.2 Conclusion and Recommendations
    • 2.2.1 Recommendations
      • 2.2.1.1 Emphasis on the EU Organic Action Plan
      • 2.2.1.2 Integration of Agri-Voltaics
      • 2.2.1.3 Foster Circular Economy
      • 2.2.1.4 Implementing Long Range Wide Area Network (LoRaWAN) in Agriculture Systems
  • 2.3 Future Roadmap for EU Green Deal

3 Research Methodology

  • 3.1 Data Sources
    • 3.1.1 Primary Data Sources
    • 3.1.2 Secondary Data Sources
    • 3.1.3 Data Triangulation

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Age Groups of Agriculture Labors and Farm Managers in Europe, 2020
  • Figure 2: Benefits for Smart Agriculture Companies if EU Green Deal is Implemented on a Larger Scale
  • Figure 3: Amount of Pesticide Used if EU Green Deal is Implemented on a Larger Scale, Million Kilograms, 2020-2030
  • Figure 4: EU SDG Index Score, 2020-2023
  • Figure 5: Some Non-EU Countries' SDG Index Score, 2020-2024
  • Figure 6: EU Green Deal: Impact Analysis on Europe/Other Countries Smart Agriculture Market Coverage
  • Figure 7: Elements of the EU Green Deal
  • Figure 8: Goals of the EU Green Deal in the Agriculture Sector
  • Figure 9: EU's Farm-to-Fork Strategy
  • Figure 10: EU Per Capita Meat Consumption, Kilograms, 2011-2031
  • Figure 11: EU Self-Sufficiency Rates for Animal Products (2020-2022 Average) and Fish (2020-2021 Average)
  • Figure 12: EU Self-Sufficiency Rate for Plant Products (2020-2022 Average)
  • Figure 13: EU Self-Sufficiency Rates for Fruits and Vegetables (2020-2022 Average)
  • Figure 14: Status of the EU Green Deal 2030 Targets for Agriculture, 2023
  • Figure 15: Pesticides Used in the Agriculture in the EU, Tons, 2022
  • Figure 16: Amount of Pesticide Used if EU Green Deal is Implemented, Million Kilograms, 2020-2030
  • Figure 17: Agricultural Production in the EU, Million Tons, 2020-2022
  • Figure 18: European Union SDG Index Score, 2019-2023
  • Figure 19: Some Non-European Union Countries' SDG Index Score, 2023
  • Figure 20: Total Agricultural Area Dedicated to Organic Farming in the EU (by Country), Thousand Hectares, 2022
  • Figure 21: Benefits of Agri-Voltaics
  • Figure 22: Ways to Implement Circular Economy in the EU
  • Figure 23: Future Roadmap for EU Green Deal Implementation
  • Figure 24: Data Triangulation

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Timeline of EU Green Deal, 2020-2024
  • Table 2: Factors Considered in the Green Deal Impact Analysis Studies on Agriculture, February 2022
  • Table 3: Global Trade Impact of Various Farm-to-Fork Strategy Targets, 2022
  • Table 4: Companies Implementing EU Green Deal in Agriculture
  • Table 5: Dedicated Organic Farming Area in EU, 2020 and 2023
  • Table 6: Actual and Projected EU Agricultural Emissions 2005-2030
  • Table 7: SDG Index Scores and Rankings in the EU (by Country), 2024
  • Table 8: Main Categories of Farm Sizes
  • Table 9: Smart Farming Application Adoption (by Farm Segment)
  • Table 10: Profitability Analysis for Maize Cultivation across Different Farm Sizes in Bangladesh, 2020
  • Table 11: Agricultural Trade Agreements between the EU and the U.S.
  • Table 12: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in the U.S.
  • Table 13: Agricultural Trade Agreements between the EU and Canada
  • Table 14: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Canada
  • Table 15: Agricultural Trade Agreements between the EU and Mexico
  • Table 16: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Mexico
  • Table 17: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Brazil
  • Table 18: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Chile
  • Table 19: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Peru
  • Table 20: Agricultural Trade Agreements between the EU and South Africa
  • Table 21: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in South Africa
  • Table 22: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
  • Table 23: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in the U.A.E
  • Table 24: Agricultural Trade Agreements between the EU and Egypt
  • Table 25: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Egypt
  • Table 26: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Turkey
  • Table 27: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Israel
  • Table 28: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in South Korea
  • Table 29: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Vietnam
  • Table 30: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in China
  • Table 31: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Japan
  • Table 32: Agricultural Trade Agreements between the EU and Singapore
  • Table 33: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Singapore
  • Table 34: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in Australia
  • Table 35: Challenges and Opportunities for Smart Farming Service Providers in New Zealand