全球遠端瀏覽器隔離市場 - 2024-2031

概述

2023年，全球遠端瀏覽器隔離市場達到5.4424億美元，預計2031年將達到49.2736億美元，2024-2031年預測期間複合年成長率為31.71%。

遠端瀏覽器隔離（通常稱為 Web 隔離）是一種安全性策略，透過將使用者裝置與直接 Internet 存取隔離來保護使用者的裝置。透過在基於雲端的遠端容器中執行所有瀏覽操作來實現隔離。透過實施網路瀏覽沙箱，遠端瀏覽器隔離可以保護資料、裝置和網路免受流氓網站程式碼造成的眾多漏洞的影響。

遠端瀏覽器隔離解決方案認知到在行動裝置上安全瀏覽網頁的必要性，從而創建了以行動為中心的功能。這些技術旨在確保智慧型手機和平板電腦上不間斷且安全的網路瀏覽。以行動裝置為中心的遠端瀏覽器隔離解決方案考慮了螢幕尺寸、觸覺互動和資源效率等元素，以確保無縫效能和使用者友善的介面。

此外，正在開發瀏覽器擴充功能和插件，以將遠端瀏覽器隔離功能直接包含到廣泛使用的行動瀏覽器中，從而消除獨立程式的必要性。這些擴充功能為消費者提供了一種實用的方法，可以在不犧牲便利性的情況下在其行動裝置上進行安全瀏覽。

動力學

日益嚴重的網路安全擔憂

網路安全威脅是指任何可能對企業營運、職能、品牌、聲譽或公眾形象造成不利影響的事件或情況。攻擊面的擴大和惡意實體的先進策略加劇了網路安全威脅的增加。利用虛擬瀏覽器技術的遠端瀏覽器隔離提供了額外的安全層，以減少來自線上瀏覽器的威脅。

例如，2023 年 1 月，以色列軟體公司 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 報告稱，透過使用遠端瀏覽器隔離偵測網路攻擊，近年來全球網路攻擊增加了 38%。此外，2022 年，美國的整體網路攻擊成長了 57%，英國成長了 77%，新加坡成長了 26%。因此，不斷升級的網路安全問題正在推動遠端瀏覽器隔離市場的擴張。

安全瀏覽器擴充功能的興起以提高生產力和保護

從傳統瀏覽器隔離技術到安全瀏覽器擴充功能的轉變是出於在當代商業環境中協調安全性與生產力的必要性。儘管隔離以前提供了強大的安全性，但它對 CPU 使用率的影響經常會阻礙效能，從而阻礙了以生產力為導向的企業的採用。在當代工作場所中，瀏覽器和 SaaS 服務已成為日常功能不可或缺的一部分，傳統隔離方法的效能缺陷可能相當明顯，進而影響安全決策。

此外，基於網路的威脅（例如網路釣魚、惡意軟體和勒索軟體）的特徵和流行程度已經超出了過時隔離方法的功效，從而導致了新的安全漏洞。安全瀏覽器擴充功能透過直接嵌入瀏覽器、透過機器學習提供即時可見性、風險評估和自動攻擊回應來彌補這些缺陷。該發明提供了不間斷的主動保護，且不影響生產力，使其成為瀏覽器安全解決方案的重要改進。

效能和延遲問題

遠端瀏覽器隔離解決方案通常需要將線上瀏覽任務委託給遠端伺服器，這可能會導致頁面載入時間和整體延遲增加。對於依賴資源密集型即時程序（例如視訊會議工具或基於雲端的軟體）的客戶來說，這種影響尤其明顯，其中速度和響應能力對於不間斷的功能至關重要。

此外，隨著企業擴大採用遠端工作模式和基於雲端的應用程式，對高速、低延遲瀏覽體驗的需求不斷升級。與遠端瀏覽器隔離相關的效能下降可能會阻止公司實施這些解決方案，因為他們優先考慮客戶滿意度和營運效率。因此，提高安全性和效能之間的平衡對遠端瀏覽器隔離的廣泛實施構成了相當大的障礙，特別是在速度和效率至關重要的情況下。

目錄

第 1 章：方法與範圍

第 2 章：定義與概述

第 3 章：執行摘要

第 4 章：動力學

• 影響因素
  • 促進要素
    • 日益嚴重的網路安全擔憂
    • 安全瀏覽器擴充功能的興起以提高生產力和保護
  • 限制
    • 效能和延遲問題
  • 機會
  • 影響分析

第 5 章：產業分析

• 波特五力分析
• 供應鏈分析
• 定價分析
• 監管分析
• 俄烏戰爭影響分析
• DMI 意見

第 6 章：COVID-19 分析

第 7 章：按類型

• 基於DOM重構
• 基於像素推送
• 網路向量渲染
• 其他

第 8 章：按組織規模

• 中小企業 (SME)
• 大型企業

第 9 章：最終用戶

• 銀行、金融服務和保險 (BFSI)
• 資訊科技和電信
• 衛生保健
• 政府和國防
• 零售與電子商務
• 教育
• 其他

第 10 章：按地區

• 北美洲
  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
• 歐洲
  • 德國
  • 英國
  • 法國
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 歐洲其他地區
• 南美洲
  • 巴西
  • 阿根廷
  • 南美洲其他地區
• 亞太
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 亞太其他地區
• 中東和非洲

第 11 章：競爭格局

• 競爭場景
• 市場定位/佔有率分析
• 併購分析

第 12 章：公司簡介

• Broadcom
• 公司概況
• 產品組合和描述
• 財務概覽
• 主要進展
• Cisco
• Cloudflare
• ConnX
• Ericom
• Forcepoint
• McAfee
• Proofpoint
• Versa Networks
• Zscaler

第 13 章：附錄

Overview

Global Remote Browser Isolation Market reached US$ 544.24 million in 2023 and is expected to reach US$ 4,927.36 million by 2031, growing with a CAGR of 31.71% during the forecast period 2024-2031.

Remote browser isolation, often known as web isolation, is a security strategy that protects users' devices by isolating them from direct internet access. The isolation is accomplished by conducting all browsing actions within a remote, cloud-based container. By implementing sandboxing for internet browsing, remote browser isolation safeguards data, devices and networks against numerous vulnerabilities posed by rogue website code.

Remote browser isolation solutions are acknowledging the necessity for secure web browsing on mobile devices, resulting in the creation of mobile-centric functionalities. These technologies are designed to ensure uninterrupted and secure web browsing on smartphones and tablets. Mobile-centric Remote Browser Isolation solutions take into account elements like screen dimensions, tactile interactions and resource efficiency to guarantee seamless performance and user-friendly interfaces.

Furthermore, browser extensions and plugins are being developed to include remote browser isolation functionalities directly into widely-used mobile browsers, thereby obviating the necessity for standalone programs. The extensions provide a practical method for consumers to achieve secure browsing on their mobile devices without sacrificing convenience.

Dynamics

The Rising Cybersecurity Concerns

A cybersecurity threat refers to any incident or situation that could lead to detrimental effects on a business's operations, functions, brand, reputation or public image. The rise in cybersecurity threats is fueled by the broadening of attack surfaces and the advancing strategies of malevolent entities. Remote browser isolation, utilizing virtual browser technology, provides an additional security layer to reduce threats originating from online browsers.

For instance, in January 2023, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., an Israel-based software firm, reported a 38% rise in global cyberattacks in recent years by using Remote browser isolation in detection of cyberattacks. Also, in 2022, US experienced a 57% rise in overall cyberattacks, UK a 77% increase and Singapore a 26% increase. Consequently, the escalating cybersecurity concerns are propelling the expansion of the remote browser isolation market.

The Rise Of Secure Browser Extensions For Enhanced Productivity And Protection

The transition from conventional browser isolation techniques to secure browser extensions is motivated by the necessity to reconcile security with productivity in the contemporary business landscape. Although isolation formerly provided strong security, its effect on CPU utilization frequently hindered performance, discouraging adoption by productivity-oriented enterprises. In contemporary workplaces, where browsers and SaaS services are integral to daily functions, the performance drawbacks of conventional isolation methods might be considerably pronounced, impacting security decisions.

Furthermore, the characteristics and prevalence of web-based threats-such as phishing, malware and ransomware-have advanced beyond the efficacy of outdated isolation methods, resulting in new security vulnerabilities. Secure browser extensions mitigate these deficiencies by embedding directly within browsers, offering real-time visibility, risk assessment and automated attack responses via machine learning. This invention provides uninterrupted, proactive protection without hindering productivity, rendering it a vital improvement in browser security solutions.

Performance And Latency Issues

Remote Browser Isolation solutions often entail delegating online browsing tasks to a remote server, potentially resulting in increased page loading times and overall latency. The effect is especially evident for customers dependent on resource-intensive, real-time programs, such as video conferencing tools or cloud-based software, where speed and responsiveness are essential for uninterrupted functionality.

Furthermore, as enterprises increasingly embrace remote work models and cloud-based apps, the demand for high-speed, low-latency browsing experiences escalates. The performance decline linked to Remote Browser Isolation may dissuade firms from implementing these solutions, as they prioritize customer delight and operational efficiency. Thus, the balance between improved security and performance presents a considerable obstacle to the widespread implementation of remote browser isolation, especially in contexts where rapidity and efficiency are critical.

Segment Analysis

The global remote browser isolation market is segmented based on type organization size, end-user and region.

DOM Reconstruction-Based Type Offers Several Advantages For Enhancing Security And Performance

DOM reconstruction-based remote browser isolation has numerous benefits for improving security and performance in the information technology and telecommunications industries. DOM reconstruction mitigates the danger of hazardous material and web-based assaults by eliminating potentially malicious code and known exploits, so offering an additional layer of protection that conventional security measures may fail to identify.

The technology enhances the surfing experience by reducing latency in specific pixel-rendering systems and sending web content directly to the user's local browser, hence improving performance and user satisfaction. Moreover, DOM reconstruction is a more economical approach than certain pixel-pushing techniques, as it obviates the necessity for substantial server-side rendering and diminishes the transfer of online content. It reduces operational expenses related to remote browser isolation while ensuring strong defense against online threats.

Geographical Penetration

North America's Increasing Need For Advanced Cybersecurity Solutions.

The robust regulatory framework in North America, encompassing data protection statutes such as the CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) and several industry-specific rules, has expedited the implementation of remote browser isolation to adhere to data security and privacy mandates. US has been a leader in implementing remote browser isolation technology to safeguard against the increasing menace of cyberattacks, including ransomware, malware and phishing.

The substantial number of online transactions and sensitive data transmitted in sectors such as finance, healthcare and telecommunications requires the implementation of stringent web security protocols. The remote browser isolation effectively mitigates web-based risks by isolating them, thereby safeguarding endpoint devices and business networks from potential harm.

Prominent cybersecurity firms and IT service providers in the region are progressively incorporating remote browser isolation into their services, enabling businesses to protect their online browsing activity without sacrificing user experience or system efficiency. The interplay of regulatory compliance, heightened demand for data protection and technical innovation establishes North America as a major market for remote browser isolation solutions.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Broadcom, Cisco, Cloudflare, ConnX, Ericom, Forcepoint, McAfee, Proofpoint, Versa Networks and Zscaler.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The war between Russia and Ukraine has profoundly affected remote browser isolation (RBI) solutions, especially in Russia, where heightened digital sovereignty initiatives and international sanctions have compromised Internet infrastructure and online security. The escalation of the conflict has prompted Russia to seek isolation of its Internet ecosystem, resulting in the exit of several international technology firms, including security and cloud service providers.

This has led to a reduced availability of dependable security technologies in Russia, especially sophisticated RBI solutions that depend on international providers for secure web browsing protection. The withdrawal of these foreign services has compelled Russian entities to rely on less dependable domestic alternatives that may not provide equivalent security against cyber threats, especially those aimed at browsers.

The sanctions and domestic censorship in Russia have exacerbated the nation's cybersecurity environment. The increasing fragmentation of the global Internet environment, coupled with the diminished presence of international network operators and service providers, has impeded the efficacy of RBI solutions. These technologies depend significantly on uninterrupted connectivity and worldwide infrastructure to detect threats in real-time.

Type

• DOM Reconstruction-Based
• Pixel Pushing-Based
• Network Vector Rendering
• Others

Organization Size

• Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
• Large Enterprises

End-User

• Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)
• IT and Telecom
• Healthcare
• Government and Defense
• Retail and E-Commerce
• Education
• Others

By Region

• North America
  • US
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • Germany
  • UK
  • France
  • Italy
  • Spain
  • Rest of Europe
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Rest of South America
• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • Rest of Asia-Pacific
• Middle East and Africa

Why Purchase the Report?

• To visualize the global remote browser isolation market segmentation based on type organization size, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
• Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
• Excel data sheet with numerous data points of the remote browser isolation market level with all segments.
• PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
• Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global remote browser isolation market report would provide approximately 62 tables, 56 figures and 213 pages

Target Audience 2024

• Manufacturers/ Buyers
• Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
• Research Professionals
• Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

• 1.1. Research Methodology
• 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Snippet by Type
• 3.2. Snippet by Organization Size
• 3.3. Snippet by End-User
• 3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

• 4.1. Impacting Factors
  • 4.1.1. Drivers
    • 4.1.1.1. The Rising Cybersecurity Concerns
    • 4.1.1.2. The Rise Of Secure Browser Extensions For Enhanced Productivity And Protection
  • 4.1.2. Restraints
    • 4.1.2.1. Performance And Latency Issues
  • 4.1.3. Opportunity
  • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

• 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
• 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
• 5.3. Pricing Analysis
• 5.4. Regulatory Analysis
• 5.5. Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis
• 5.6. DMI Opinion

6. COVID-19 Analysis

• 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
  • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID-19
  • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID-19
  • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID-19
• 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
• 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
• 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
• 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
• 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

• 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
  • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
• 7.2. DOM Reconstruction-Based*
  • 7.2.1. Introduction
  • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 7.3. Pixel Pushing-Based
• 7.4. Network Vector Rendering
• 7.5. Others

8. By Organization Size

• 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
  • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Organization Size
• 8.2. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)*
  • 8.2.1. Introduction
  • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 8.3. Large Enterprises

9. By End-User

• 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
  • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
• 9.2. Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)*
  • 9.2.1. Introduction
  • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 9.3. IT and Telecom
• 9.4. Healthcare
• 9.5. Government and Defense
• 9.6. Retail and E-Commerce
• 9.7. Education
• 9.8. Others

10. By Region

• 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
  • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
• 10.2. North America
  • 10.2.1. Introduction
  • 10.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 10.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
  • 10.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
  • 10.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
  • 10.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 10.2.6.1. US
    • 10.2.6.2. Canada
    • 10.2.6.3. Mexico
• 10.3. Europe
  • 10.3.1. Introduction
  • 10.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 10.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
  • 10.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
  • 10.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
  • 10.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 10.3.6.1. Germany
    • 10.3.6.2. UK
    • 10.3.6.3. France
    • 10.3.6.4. Italy
    • 10.3.6.5. Spain
    • 10.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
• 10.4. South America
  • 10.4.1. Introduction
  • 10.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 10.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
  • 10.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
  • 10.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
  • 10.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 10.4.6.1. Brazil
    • 10.4.6.2. Argentina
    • 10.4.6.3. Rest of South America
• 10.5. Asia-Pacific
  • 10.5.1. Introduction
  • 10.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 10.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
  • 10.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
  • 10.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
  • 10.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 10.5.6.1. China
    • 10.5.6.2. India
    • 10.5.6.3. Japan
    • 10.5.6.4. Australia
    • 10.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
• 10.6. Middle East and Africa
  • 10.6.1. Introduction
  • 10.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 10.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
  • 10.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
  • 10.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

11. Competitive Landscape

• 11.1. Competitive Scenario
• 11.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
• 11.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

12. Company Profiles

• 12.1. Broadcom*
  • 12.1.1. Company Overview
  • 12.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
  • 12.1.3. Financial Overview
  • 12.1.4. Key Developments
• 12.2. Cisco
• 12.3. Cloudflare
• 12.4. ConnX
• 12.5. Ericom
• 12.6. Forcepoint
• 12.7. McAfee
• 12.8. Proofpoint
• 12.9. Versa Networks
• 12.10. Zscaler

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

13. Appendix

• 13.1. About Us and Services
• 13.2. Contact Us