生物分解和可堆肥包裝的全球市場(2025-2035)
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1563427

生物分解和可堆肥包裝的全球市場(2025-2035)

The Global Market for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging 2025-2035

出版日期: | 出版商: Future Markets, Inc. | 英文 324 Pages, 54 Tables, 73 Figures | 訂單完成後即時交付

價格

由於環保意識的增強、嚴格的法規以及消費者對永續產品偏好的變化,生物分解和可堆肥包裝市場呈現快速成長。該行業提供了傳統塑膠包裝的環保替代品,並已成為全球包裝行業的重要組成部分。目前,該市場的特點是材料和技術多樣,包括聚乳酸(PLA)、聚羥基脂肪酸酯(PHA)、澱粉基混合物和纖維素基包裝解決方案。這些材料用於多種行業,但由於人們對食品供應鏈中塑膠廢棄物的擔憂日益增加,食品包裝已成為最大的區隔。包裝行業的領先公司大力投資研發,以提高生物分解材料的性能和成本效益。同時,許多新創公司和創新公司正帶著新穎的解決方案進入市場,例如基於海藻的包裝和菌絲體衍生材料。在這個市場中,可看到可堆肥包裝的發展趨勢,這種包裝可以在家庭堆肥中分解,以解決工業堆肥基礎設施的限制。此外,人們的注意力集中在多功能包裝的開發上,這種包裝不僅生物分解,而且還能延長產品的保存期限並融入智慧技術。

儘管生物分解包裝市場不斷成長,但仍面臨一些挑戰,例如與傳統塑膠相比,生產成本更高、某些應用的性能有限以及需要適當的廢棄物管理基礎設施。然而,持續的技術進步和規模經濟逐漸解決這些問題。隨著世界走向永續發展,生物分解和可堆肥包裝市場預計將繼續呈上升趨勢。隨著大公司獲得有前途的技術,各行業可能會看到更多的創新、跨部門的採用增加以及整合的增加。這種成長不僅重塑了包裝產業,也為全球減少塑膠廢棄物和環境污染的努力做出了重大貢獻。

本報告研究和分析了全球生物分解和可堆肥包裝市場,包括市場規模和成長預測、材料創新的詳細資訊、使用情況、競爭格局以及對永續性的影響。

目錄

第1章 執行摘要

  • 世界包裝市場
  • 生物分解和可堆肥包裝市場
    • 依生物基塑膠類型
    • 依包裝產品類型
    • 依最終用途市場
    • 依地區
  • 主要類型
    • 醋酸纖維素
    • PLA
    • 脂肪族芳香族共聚酯
    • PHA
    • 澱粉/澱粉混合物
  • 價格
  • 市場趨勢
  • 生物分解和可堆肥包裝近期成長的市場驅動力
  • 生物分解和可堆肥包裝的挑戰

第2章 可生物分解和可堆肥包裝中的生物基材料

  • 材料創新
  • 活性包裝
  • 單一材料包裝
  • 用於包裝的傳統高分子材料
    • 聚烯烴:聚丙烯和聚乙烯
    • PET 和其他聚酯聚合物
    • 用於包裝的再生生物基聚合物
    • 合成化石基聚合物與生物基聚合物的比較
    • 包裝中的生物塑膠過程
    • 生物基永續包裝廢棄物處理
  • 合成生物基包裝材料
    • 聚乳酸(Bio PLA)
    • 聚對苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(Bio PET)
    • 聚對苯二甲酸丙二醇酯(Bio PTT)
    • 聚乙烯呋喃酸酯(Bio PEF)
    • 生物PA
    • 聚(己二酸-對苯二甲酸丁二醇酯)(Bio PBAT)- 脂肪族芳香族共聚酯
    • 聚丁二酸丁二醇酯(PBS)及其共聚物
    • 聚丙烯(Bio PP)
  • 天然生物基包裝材料
    • 聚羥基鏈烷酸(PHA)
    • 澱粉基混合物
    • 纖維素
    • 包裝材料中的蛋白質生物塑膠
    • 包裝用脂類和蠟
    • 海藻包裝
    • 菌絲體
    • 殼聚醣
    • 生物石腦油

第3章 市場與應用

  • 紙/紙板包裝
  • 食品包裝
    • 生物基薄膜、托盤
    • 生物基小袋、袋子
    • 生物基紡織品,網
    • 生物黏合劑
    • 阻隔塗層、薄膜
    • 主動智慧食品包裝
    • 抗菌膜、抗菌劑
    • 生物基油墨、染料
    • 可食用薄膜、塗層
  • 包裝中的生物基薄膜和塗料
    • 摘要
    • 使用生物基油漆和塗料的挑戰
    • 包裝中使用的生物基塗料和薄膜的類型
  • 用於包裝的碳回收材料
    • 在塑膠原料中使用碳的優點
    • 二氧化碳衍生的聚合物和塑膠
    • 二氧化碳利用產品
  • 軟包裝
  • 硬包裝
  • 塗層、薄膜

第4章 公司簡介(230家公司簡介)

第5章 研究方法

第6章 參考文獻

The market for biodegradable and compostable packaging is experiencing rapid growth, driven by increasing environmental awareness, stringent regulations, and shifting consumer preferences towards sustainable products. This sector has emerged as a crucial component of the global packaging industry, offering eco-friendly alternatives to traditional plastic packaging. Currently, the market is characterized by a diverse range of materials and technologies, including polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), starch-based blends, and cellulose-derived packaging solutions. These materials are finding applications across various industries, with food packaging representing the largest segment due to growing concerns about plastic waste in the food supply chain. Major players in the packaging industry are investing heavily in research and development to improve the performance and cost-effectiveness of biodegradable materials. Simultaneously, numerous start-ups and innovative companies are entering the market with novel solutions, such as seaweed-based packaging and mycelium-derived materials. The market is witnessing a trend towards the development of compostable packaging that can break down in home composting conditions, addressing the limitations of industrial composting infrastructure. Additionally, there is a growing focus on creating multi-functional packaging that not only biodegrades but also offers enhanced shelf life for products or incorporates smart technologies.

Despite its growth, the biodegradable packaging market faces challenges, including higher production costs compared to conventional plastics, performance limitations in certain applications, and the need for proper waste management infrastructure. However, ongoing technological advancements and economies of scale are gradually addressing these issues. As the global push for sustainability intensifies, the biodegradable and compostable packaging market is expected to continue its upward trajectory. The industry is likely to see further innovations, increased adoption across various sectors, and potential consolidation as larger companies acquire promising technologies. This growth is not only reshaping the packaging industry but also contributing significantly to global efforts in reducing plastic waste and environmental pollution.

"The Global Market for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging 2025-2035" provides a thorough examination of the market landscape from 2025 to 2035, offering valuable insights for manufacturers, investors, and stakeholders in the sustainable packaging ecosystem.

Report contents include:

  • Market Size and Growth Projections: Detailed forecasts of the biodegradable and compostable packaging market size and growth rate from 2025 to 2035, segmented by product type, material, end-use industry, and region.
  • Material Innovation Deep Dive: Comprehensive analysis of both synthetic and natural biobased packaging materials, including PLA, Bio-PET, PHA, starch-based blends, and emerging solutions like mycelium and seaweed-based packaging.
  • Application Landscape: Exploration of key application areas such as food packaging, consumer goods, pharmaceuticals, and e-commerce, with insights into specific requirements and growth opportunities.
  • Competitive Landscape: Profiles of leading companies and emerging players in the biodegradable packaging space, including their technologies, strategies, and market positioning. Companies profiled include 9Fiber, Inc., ADBioplastics, Advanced Biochemical (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Aeropowder Limited, AGRANA Staerke GmbH, Ahlstrom-Munksjo Oyj, Alberta Innovates/Innotech Materials, LLC, Alter Eco Pulp, Alterpacks, AmicaTerra, An Phat Bioplastics, Anellotech, Inc., Ankor Bioplastics Co., Ltd., ANPOLY, Inc., Apeel Sciences, Applied Bioplastics, Aquapak Polymers Ltd, Archer Daniel Midland Company (ADM), Arekapak GmbH, Arkema S.A, Arrow Greentech, Asahi Kasei Chemicals Corporation, Attis Innovations, llc, Avani Eco, Avantium B.V., Avient Corporation, Balrampur Chini Mills, BASF SE, Bio Fab NZ, Bio Plast Pom, Bio2Coat, Bioelements Group, Biofibre GmbH, Bioform Technologies, Biokemik, BIOLO, BioLogiQ, Inc., Biome Bioplastics, Biomass Resin Holdings Co., Ltd., BIO-FED, BIO-LUTIONS International AG, Bioplastech Ltd, BioSmart Nano, BIOTEC GmbH & Co. KG, Biovox GmbH, BlockTexx Pty Ltd., Blue Ocean Closures, Bluepha Beijing Lanjing Microbiology Technology Co., Ltd., BOBST, Borealis AG, Brightplus Oy, Business Innovation Partners Co., Ltd., Carbiolice, Carbios, Cardia Bioplastics Ltd., CARAPAC Company, Cass Materials Pty Ltd, Celanese Corporation, Cellugy, Cellutech AB (Stora Enso), Chemkey Advanced Materials Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Chemol Company (Seydel), CJ Biomaterials, Inc., Coastgrass ApS, Corumat, Inc., Cruz Foam, CuanTec Ltd., Daicel Polymer Ltd., Daio Paper Corporation, Danimer Scientific LLC, DIC Corporation, DIC Products, Inc., DKS Co. Ltd., Dow, Inc., DuFor Resins B.V., DuPont, Earthodic Pty Ltd., EarthForm, Ecomann Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Ecoshell, EcoSynthetix, Inc., Ecovia Renewables, Enkev, Epoch Biodesign, Eranova, Esbottle Oy, Fiberlean Technologies, Fiberwood Oy, FKuR Kunststoff GmbH, Floreon, Footprint, Fraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research ISC, Full Cycle Bioplastics LLC, Futamura Chemical Co., Ltd., Futuramat Sarl, Futurity Bio-Ventures Ltd., Genecis Bioindustries, Inc., Grabio Greentech Corporation, Granbio Technologies, GreenNano Technologies Inc., GS Alliance Co. Ltd, Guangzhou Bio-plus Materials Technology Co., Ltd., Hokuetsu Toyo Fibre Co., Ltd., Holmen Iggesund, IUV Srl, Jiangsu Jinhe Hi-Tech Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Torise Biomaterials Co., Ltd, JinHui ZhaoLang High Technology Co., Ltd., Kagzi Bottles Private Limited, Kami Shoji Company, Kaneka Corporation, Kelpi Industries Ltd., Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co. Ltd., Klabin S.A., Lactips S.A., LAM'ON, LanzaTech, Licella, Lignin Industries, Loick Biowertstoff GmbH, LOTTE Chemical Corporation, MadeRight, MakeGrowLab, Marea, Marine Innovation Co., Ltd, Melodea Ltd., Mi Terro, Inc., Mitr Phol, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH, Mitsui Chemicals, Inc., Mobius, Mondi, Multibax Public Co., Ltd., Nabaco, Inc., NatPol, Nature Coatings, Inc., NatureWorks LLC, New Zealand Natural Fibers (NZNF), Newlight Technologies, NEXE Innovations Inc., Nippon Paper Industries, Notpla, Novamont S.p.A., Novomer, Oimo, Oji Paper Company, Omya, one - five GmbH, Origin Materials, Pack2Earth, Paptic Ltd., Pivot Materials LLC, Plafco Fibertech Oy, Plantic Technologies Ltd., Plantics B.V., Poliloop, Polyferm Canada, Pond Biomaterials, Provenance Biofabrics, Inc., PT Intera Lestari Polimer, PTT MCC Biochem Co., Ltd., Qnature UG, Rengo Co., Ltd., Rise Innventia AB, Rodenburg Productie B.V., Roquette S.A., RWDC Industries, S.lab, Sappi Limited, Saudi Basic Industries Corp. (SABIC), Searo, Shellworks, Shenzhen Ecomann Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Sirmax Group, SK Chemicals Co., Ltd., Solvay SA, Spectrus Sustainable Solutions Pvt Ltd, Spero Renewables, StePAc, Stora Enso Oyj, Sufresca, Sulapac Oy, Sulzer Chemtech AG, SUPLA Bioplastics, Sway Innovation Co., Sweetwater Energy, Taghleef Industries Llc, Teal Bioworks, Inc., TemperPack-R Technologies, Termotecnica, TerraVerdae BioWorks Inc, Tianjin GreenBio Materials Co., Ltd, Ticinoplast, TIPA, Toppan Printing Co., Ltd., Toraphene, TotalEnergies Corbion, Universal Bio Pack Co., Ltd., UPM Biochemicals, UPM-Kymmene Oyj, Valentis Nanotech, Vegea srl, Verso Corporation, Weidmann Fiber Technology, Woamy Oy, Woodly Ltd., Worn Again Technologies, Xampla, Yangi, Yokohama Bio Frontier, Inc., Zelfo Technology, ZeroCircle, Zhejiang Jinjiahao Green Nanomaterial Co., Ltd.
  • Sustainability Impact: Assessment of the environmental benefits and challenges associated with biodegradable and compostable packaging, including life cycle analyses and circular economy initiatives.
  • Recent developments in biodegradable packaging technology.
  • Market Drivers and Opportunities.
  • Challenges and Market Dynamics
  • Regional Analysis and Market Opportunities
  • In-depth analysis of biodegradable packaging applications across various industries:
    • Food and Beverage: Largest market segment with diverse applications from fresh produce to dairy packaging
    • Consumer Goods: Growing demand in personal care and household products
    • Pharmaceutical: Increasing use of bioplastics in medical packaging and drug delivery systems
    • E-commerce: Rising adoption of sustainable packaging solutions for online retail
  • Materials Benchmarking and Performance Analysis
  • Manufacturing and Processing Innovations
    • Improvements in extrusion and thermoforming processes
    • Novel approaches to enhance material properties
    • Scalability considerations for mass production
    • Quality control and testing methodologies
  • Investment Landscape and Market Opportunities
  • Regulatory Framework and Standards

As the world moves towards more sustainable packaging solutions, understanding the biodegradable and compostable packaging market is crucial for:

  • Packaging manufacturers looking to expand their product portfolio
  • Brand owners seeking to meet sustainability goals and consumer demands
  • Investors interested in high-growth areas of the packaging industry
  • Policy makers developing regulations for sustainable packaging
  • Researchers and material scientists working on next-generation packaging solutions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • 1.1. Global Packaging Market
  • 1.2. The Market for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging
    • 1.2.1. By biobased plastics type
    • 1.2.2. By packaging product type
    • 1.2.3. By end-use market
    • 1.2.4. By region
  • 1.3. Main types
    • 1.3.1. Cellulose acetate
    • 1.3.2. PLA
    • 1.3.3. Aliphatic-aromatic co-polyesters
    • 1.3.4. PHA
    • 1.3.5. Starch/starch blends
  • 1.4. Prices
  • 1.5. Market Trends
  • 1.6. Market Drivers for recent growth in Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging
  • 1.7. Challenges for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging

2. BIOBASED MATERIALS IN BIODEGRADABLE AND COMPOSTABLE PACKAGING

  • 2.1. Materials innovation
  • 2.2. Active packaging
  • 2.3. Monomaterial packaging
  • 2.4. Conventional polymer materials used in packaging
    • 2.4.1. Polyolefins: Polypropylene and polyethylene
      • 2.4.1.1. Overview
      • 2.4.1.2. Grades
      • 2.4.1.3. Producers
    • 2.4.2. PET and other polyester polymers
      • 2.4.2.1. Overview
    • 2.4.3. Renewable and bio-based polymers for packaging
    • 2.4.4. Comparison of synthetic fossil-based and bio-based polymers
    • 2.4.5. Processes for bioplastics in packaging
    • 2.4.6. End-of-life treatment of bio-based and sustainable packaging
  • 2.5. Synthetic bio-based packaging materials
    • 2.5.1. Polylactic acid (Bio-PLA)
      • 2.5.1.1. Overview
      • 2.5.1.2. Properties
      • 2.5.1.3. Applications
      • 2.5.1.4. Advantages
      • 2.5.1.5. Challenges
      • 2.5.1.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.2. Polyethylene terephthalate (Bio-PET)
      • 2.5.2.1. Overview
      • 2.5.2.2. Properties
      • 2.5.2.3. Applications
      • 2.5.2.4. Advantages of Bio-PET in Packaging
      • 2.5.2.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.2.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.3. Polytrimethylene terephthalate (Bio-PTT)
      • 2.5.3.1. Overview
      • 2.5.3.2. Production Process
      • 2.5.3.3. Properties
      • 2.5.3.4. Applications
      • 2.5.3.5. Advantages of Bio-PTT in Packaging
      • 2.5.3.6. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.3.7. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.4. Polyethylene furanoate (Bio-PEF)
      • 2.5.4.1. Overview
      • 2.5.4.2. Properties
      • 2.5.4.3. Applications
      • 2.5.4.4. Advantages of Bio-PEF in Packaging
      • 2.5.4.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.4.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.5. Bio-PA
      • 2.5.5.1. Overview
      • 2.5.5.2. Properties
      • 2.5.5.3. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.5.5.4. Advantages of Bio-PA in Packaging
      • 2.5.5.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.5.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.6. Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (Bio-PBAT)- Aliphatic aromatic copolyesters
      • 2.5.6.1. Overview
      • 2.5.6.2. Properties
      • 2.5.6.3. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.5.6.4. Advantages of Bio-PBAT in Packaging
      • 2.5.6.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.6.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.7. Polybutylene succinate (PBS) and copolymers
      • 2.5.7.1. Overview
      • 2.5.7.2. Properties
      • 2.5.7.3. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.5.7.4. Advantages of Bio-PBS and Co-polymers in Packaging
      • 2.5.7.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.7.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.8. Polypropylene (Bio-PP)
      • 2.5.8.1. Overview
      • 2.5.8.2. Properties
      • 2.5.8.3. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.5.8.4. Advantages of Bio-PP in Packaging
      • 2.5.8.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.8.6. Commercial examples
  • 2.6. Natural bio-based packaging materials
    • 2.6.1. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA)
      • 2.6.1.1. Properties
      • 2.6.1.2. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.6.1.3. Advantages of PHA in Packaging
      • 2.6.1.4. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.6.1.5. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.2. Starch-based blends
      • 2.6.2.1. Overview
      • 2.6.2.2. Properties
      • 2.6.2.3. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.6.2.4. Advantages of Starch-Based Blends in Packaging
      • 2.6.2.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.6.2.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.3. Cellulose
      • 2.6.3.1. Feedstocks
        • 2.6.3.1.1. Wood
        • 2.6.3.1.2. Plant
        • 2.6.3.1.3. Tunicate
        • 2.6.3.1.4. Algae
        • 2.6.3.1.5. Bacteria
      • 2.6.3.2. Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)
        • 2.6.3.2.1. Properties
      • 2.6.3.3. Nanocellulose
        • 2.6.3.3.1. Cellulose nanocrystals
          • 2.6.3.3.1.1. Applications in packaging
        • 2.6.3.3.2. Cellulose nanofibers
          • 2.6.3.3.2.1. Applications in packaging
        • 2.6.3.3.3. Bacterial Nanocellulose (BNC)
          • 2.6.3.3.3.1. Applications in packaging
      • 2.6.3.4. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.4. Protein-based bioplastics in packaging
      • 2.6.4.1. Feedstocks
      • 2.6.4.2. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.5. Lipids and waxes for packaging
      • 2.6.5.1. Overview
      • 2.6.5.2. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.6. Seaweed-based packaging
      • 2.6.6.1. Overview
      • 2.6.6.2. Production
      • 2.6.6.3. Applications in packaging
      • 2.6.6.4. Producers
    • 2.6.7. Mycelium
      • 2.6.7.1. Overview
      • 2.6.7.2. Applications in packaging
      • 2.6.7.3. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.8. Chitosan
      • 2.6.8.1. Overview
      • 2.6.8.2. Applications in packaging
      • 2.6.8.3. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.9. Bio-naphtha
      • 2.6.9.1. Overview
      • 2.6.9.2. Markets and applications
      • 2.6.9.3. Commercial examples

3. MARKETS AND APPLICATIONS

  • 3.1. Paper and board packaging
  • 3.2. Food packaging
    • 3.2.1. Bio-Based films and trays
    • 3.2.2. Bio-Based pouches and bags
    • 3.2.3. Bio-Based textiles and nets
    • 3.2.4. Bioadhesives
      • 3.2.4.1. Starch
      • 3.2.4.2. Cellulose
      • 3.2.4.3. Protein-Based
    • 3.2.5. Barrier coatings and films
      • 3.2.5.1. Polysaccharides
        • 3.2.5.1.1. Chitin
        • 3.2.5.1.2. Chitosan
        • 3.2.5.1.3. Starch
      • 3.2.5.2. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA)
      • 3.2.5.3. Poly(butylene Succinate)
      • 3.2.5.4. Functional Lipid and Proteins Based Coatings
    • 3.2.6. Active and Smart Food Packaging
      • 3.2.6.1. Active Materials and Packaging Systems
      • 3.2.6.2. Intelligent and Smart Food Packaging
    • 3.2.7. Antimicrobial films and agents
      • 3.2.7.1. Natural
      • 3.2.7.2. Inorganic nanoparticles
      • 3.2.7.3. Biopolymers
    • 3.2.8. Bio-based Inks and Dyes
    • 3.2.9. Edible films and coatings
      • 3.2.9.1. Overview
      • 3.2.9.2. Commercial examples
  • 3.3. Biobased films and coatings in packaging
    • 3.3.1. Overview
    • 3.3.2. Challenges using bio-based paints and coatings
    • 3.3.3. Types of bio-based coatings and films in packaging
      • 3.3.3.1. Polyurethane coatings
        • 3.3.3.1.1. Properties
        • 3.3.3.1.2. Bio-based polyurethane coatings
        • 3.3.3.1.3. Products
      • 3.3.3.2. Acrylate resins
        • 3.3.3.2.1. Properties
        • 3.3.3.2.2. Bio-based acrylates
        • 3.3.3.2.3. Products
      • 3.3.3.3. Polylactic acid (Bio-PLA)
        • 3.3.3.3.1. Properties
        • 3.3.3.3.2. Bio-PLA coatings and films
      • 3.3.3.4. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) coatings
      • 3.3.3.5. Cellulose coatings and films
        • 3.3.3.5.1. Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)
        • 3.3.3.5.2. Cellulose nanofibers
          • 3.3.3.5.2.1. Properties
          • 3.3.3.5.2.2. Product developers
      • 3.3.3.6. Lignin coatings
      • 3.3.3.7. Protein-based biomaterials for coatings
        • 3.3.3.7.1. Plant derived proteins
        • 3.3.3.7.2. Animal origin proteins
  • 3.4. Carbon capture derived materials for packaging
    • 3.4.1. Benefits of carbon utilization for plastics feedstocks
    • 3.4.2. CO2-derived polymers and plastics
    • 3.4.3. CO2 utilization products
  • 3.5. Flexible packaging
  • 3.6. Rigid packaging
  • 3.7. Coatings and films

4. COMPANY PROFILES (230 company profiles)

5. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

6. REFERENCES

List of Tables

  • Table 1. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by biobased plastics type, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Table 2. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by packaging product type, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Table 3. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by end-use market, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Table 4. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by region, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Table 5. Main Types of Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging Materials
  • Table 6. Average prices by bioplastic type, 2024 (US$ per kg)
  • Table 7. Average annual prices by bioplastic type, 2020-2023 (US$ per kg)
  • Table 8. Market trends in Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging
  • Table 9. Market drivers for recent growth in the Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging market
  • Table 10. Challenges for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging
  • Table 11. Types of bio-based plastics and fossil-fuel-based plastics
  • Table 12. Comparison of synthetic fossil-based and bio-based polymers
  • Table 13. Processes for bioplastics in packaging
  • Table 14. LDPE film versus PLA, 2019-24 (USD/tonne)
  • Table 15. PLA properties for packaging applications
  • Table 16. Applications, advantages and disadvantages of PHAs in packaging
  • Table 17. Major polymers found in the extracellular covering of different algae
  • Table 18. Market overview for cellulose microfibers (microfibrillated cellulose) in paperboard and packaging-market age, key benefits, applications and producers
  • Table 19. Applications of nanocrystalline cellulose (CNC)
  • Table 20. Market overview for cellulose nanofibers in packaging
  • Table 21. Applications of Bacterial Nanocellulose in Packaging
  • Table 22. Types of protein based-bioplastics, applications and companies
  • Table 23. Overview of alginate-description, properties, application and market size
  • Table 24. Companies developing algal-based bioplastics
  • Table 25. Overview of mycelium fibers-description, properties, drawbacks and applications
  • Table 26. Overview of chitosan-description, properties, drawbacks and applications
  • Table 27. Commercial Examples of Chitosan-based Films and Coatings and Companies
  • Table 28. Bio-based naphtha markets and applications
  • Table 29. Bio-naphtha market value chain
  • Table 30. Commercial Examples of Bio-Naphtha Packaging and Companies
  • Table 31. Pros and cons of different type of food packaging materials
  • Table 32. Active Biodegradable Films films and their food applications
  • Table 33. Intelligent Biodegradable Films
  • Table 34. Edible films and coatings market summary
  • Table 35. Summary of barrier films and coatings for packaging
  • Table 36. Types of polyols
  • Table 37. Polyol producers
  • Table 38. Bio-based polyurethane coating products
  • Table 39. Bio-based acrylate resin products
  • Table 40. Polylactic acid (PLA) market analysis
  • Table 41. Commercially available PHAs
  • Table 42. Market overview for cellulose nanofibers in paints and coatings
  • Table 43. Companies developing cellulose nanofibers products in paints and coatings
  • Table 44. Types of protein based-biomaterials, applications and companies
  • Table 45. CO2 utilization and removal pathways
  • Table 46. CO2 utilization products developed by chemical and plastic producers
  • Table 47. Comparison of bioplastics' (PLA and PHAs) properties to other common polymers used in product packaging
  • Table 48. Typical applications for bioplastics in flexible packaging
  • Table 49. Bioplastics for flexible packaging by bioplastic material type, 2019-2035 ('000 tonnes)
  • Table 50. Typical applications for bioplastics in rigid packaging
  • Table 51. Bioplastics for rigid packaging by bioplastic material type, 2019-2035 ('000 tonnes)
  • Table 52. Market revenues for bio-based coatings in packaging, 2018-2035 (billions USD), high estimate
  • Table 53. Lactips plastic pellets
  • Table 54. Oji Holdings CNF products

List of Figures

  • Figure 1. Global packaging market by material type
  • Figure 2. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by biobased plastics type, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Figure 3. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by packaging product type, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Figure 4. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by end-use market, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Figure 5. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by region, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Figure 6. Routes for synthesizing polymers from fossil-based and bio-based resources
  • Figure 7. Organization and morphology of cellulose synthesizing terminal complexes (TCs) in different organisms
  • Figure 8. Biosynthesis of (a) wood cellulose (b) tunicate cellulose and (c) BC
  • Figure 9. Cellulose microfibrils and nanofibrils
  • Figure 10. TEM image of cellulose nanocrystals
  • Figure 11. CNC slurry
  • Figure 12. CNF gel
  • Figure 13. Bacterial nanocellulose shapes
  • Figure 14. BLOOM masterbatch from Algix
  • Figure 15. Typical structure of mycelium-based foam
  • Figure 16. Types of bio-based materials used for antimicrobial food packaging application
  • Figure 17. Water soluble packaging by Notpla
  • Figure 18. Examples of edible films in food packaging
  • Figure 19. Schematic of gas barrier properties of nanoclay film
  • Figure 20. Hefcel-coated wood (left) and untreated wood (right) after 30 seconds flame test
  • Figure 21. Applications for CO2
  • Figure 22. Life cycle of CO2-derived products and services
  • Figure 23. Conversion pathways for CO2-derived polymeric materials
  • Figure 24. Bioplastics for flexible packaging by bioplastic material type, 2019-2035 ('000 tonnes)
  • Figure 25. Bioplastics for rigid packaging by bioplastic material type, 2019-2035 ('000 tonnes)
  • Figure 26. Market revenues for bio-based coatings in packaging, 2018-2035 (billions USD), conservative estimate
  • Figure 27. Pluumo
  • Figure 28. Anpoly cellulose nanofiber hydrogel
  • Figure 29. MEDICELLU(TM)
  • Figure 30. Asahi Kasei CNF fabric sheet
  • Figure 31. Properties of Asahi Kasei cellulose nanofiber nonwoven fabric
  • Figure 32. CNF nonwoven fabric
  • Figure 33. Passionfruit wrapped in Xgo Circular packaging
  • Figure 34. BIOLO e-commerce mailer bag made from PHA
  • Figure 35. Reusable and recyclable foodservice cups, lids, and straws from Joinease Hong Kong Ltd., made with plant-based NuPlastiQ BioPolymer from BioLogiQ, Inc
  • Figure 36. Fiber-based screw cap
  • Figure 37. SEELCAP ONEGO
  • Figure 38. CJ CheilJedang's biodegradable PHA-based wrapper for shipping products
  • Figure 39. CuanSave film
  • Figure 40. ELLEX products
  • Figure 41. CNF-reinforced PP compounds
  • Figure 42. Kirekira! toilet wipes
  • Figure 43. Edible packaging from Dissolves
  • Figure 44. Rheocrysta spray
  • Figure 45. DKS CNF products
  • Figure 46. Evoware edible seaweed-based packaging
  • Figure 47. Photograph (a) and micrograph (b) of mineral/ MFC composite showing the high viscosity and fibrillar structure
  • Figure 48. Forest and Whale container
  • Figure 49. PHA production process
  • Figure 50. Soy Silvestre's wheatgrass shots
  • Figure 51. AVAPTM process
  • Figure 52. GreenPower+(TM) process
  • Figure 53. Cutlery samples (spoon, knife, fork) made of nano cellulose and biodegradable plastic composite materials
  • Figure 54. CNF gel
  • Figure 55. Block nanocellulose material
  • Figure 56. CNF products developed by Hokuetsu
  • Figure 57. Unilever Carte D'Or ice cream packaging
  • Figure 58. Kami Shoji CNF products
  • Figure 59. IPA synthesis method
  • Figure 60. Compostable water pod
  • Figure 61. XCNF
  • Figure 62: Innventia AB movable nanocellulose demo plant
  • Figure 63. Shellworks packaging containers
  • Figure 64. Thales packaging incorporating Fibrease
  • Figure 65. Sulapac cosmetics containers
  • Figure 66. Sulzer equipment for PLA polymerization processing
  • Figure 67. Silver / CNF composite dispersions
  • Figure 68. CNF/nanosilver powder
  • Figure 69. Corbion FDCA production process
  • Figure 70. UPM biorefinery process
  • Figure 71. Vegea production process
  • Figure 72. Worn Again products
  • Figure 73. S-CNF in powder form