市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1471285
共乘市場:按通勤距離、車輛類型、經營模式和服務供應商- 2024-2030 年全球預測Ride Sharing Market by Commuting Distance (Intercity, Intra City), Vehicle Type (Bikes, Cars, Scooters), Business Model, Service Provider - Global Forecast 2024-2030 |
※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。
預計2023年共享旅遊市場規模為1,091.2億美元,預估2024年將達1,229.1億美元,2030年將達2,590.1億美元,複合年成長率為13.14%。
共乘是私家車的共享使用,乘客透過按需服務出行,同時將他們與其他人的路線相匹配,或者將多個前往同一方向的乘客聚集在一起。這種協作交通模式利用數位平台(通常是行動應用程式)將尋求乘車的乘客與可用的服務商聯繫起來。共乘的成長得益於多種因素,包括智慧型手機普及的提高以及共享經濟服務的文化接受度不斷提高。城市中心人口密度高且停車位往往不足,特別適合共乘。然而,對乘客和駕駛人安全的擔憂、監管不力、共乘駕駛人的就業權利以及對傳統計程車服務的影響正在影響共乘的採用。服務提供者正在透過確保協調員的背景調查和培訓、更明確地制定招募準則以及促進與城市的合作夥伴關係來應對嚴峻的挑戰,以補充大眾交通工具選擇。自動駕駛技術有潛力透過降低營運成本和提高安全性來徹底改變市場。人們擴大使用資料分析來進行路線最佳化和需求預測,並專注於擴大電動和混合動力汽車持有以解決環境永續性。智慧城市措施的興起可能會進一步推動共乘生態系統的發展,創造更互聯和高效的城市出行願景。
主要市場統計 | |
---|---|
基準年[2023] | 1091.2億美元 |
預測年份 [2024] | 1229.1億美元 |
預測年份 [2030] | 2590.1億美元 |
複合年成長率(%) | 13.14% |
通勤距離:城內共乘提供節省成本且舒適的選擇
城際共乘針對的是需要不同城市之間交通的客戶。這個細分市場的特點是出行距離長,常被選擇用於休閒旅行、探親訪友、外出商務會議以及在一個城市生活而在另一個城市工作的人們的通勤。城內共乘主要關注一個城市及其郊區內的交通。此細分市場客戶偏好的主要促進因素包括彈性、速度、成本和可用性。使用者在日常通勤、短途出差以及大眾交通工具難以使用的夜間交通時通常會選擇共乘。市內乘車共享服務通常提供多種選擇,包括節省成本的泳池乘車、提供優質體驗的豪華選擇以及方便的個人乘車。這些服務廣泛採用根據需求和一天中的時間而變化的動態定價模型。與城際交通領域相比,城內交通供應商專注於改善使用者體驗的數位創新,努力減少等待時間並提供有競爭力的價格。
車輛類型: 可遠距運送多名乘客 汽車共享
自行車共享系統在都市區正在顯著成長,交通堵塞和停車問題增加了對替代交通的需求。自行車是一種環保、促進健康的交通途徑,特別適合短途旅行和最後一英里的交通。汽車共享平台因其方便、舒適、適合遠距和團體出行而受到青睞。汽車共享平台對於那些想要擁有私家車的多功能性而無需支付擁有成本的用戶來說很有吸引力。電動Scooter有腳踏式和坐式兩種版本,由於靈活且易於使用,在都市區越來越受歡迎。適合短途旅行,讓您在繁忙的道路上快速移動。由於價格低廉、停車方便,特別受到年輕人的歡迎。自行車是最環保、最經濟的。它們通常因其健康益處和在自行車友善城市的易用性而被選擇。汽車為長途旅行和團體旅行提供了最通用、最舒適的交通工具,但價格昂貴,對都市區擁擠影響不大。Scooter在兩者之間取得了很好的平衡,可以讓您快速輕鬆地進行短距離旅行。
經營模式:提高企業對消費者乘車共享領域的便利性與易用性
共乘市場的 B2B 細分市場針對的是需要為其員工和業務合作夥伴提供交通服務的企業。這可能包括乘車共享平台上的公司帳戶,員工可以透過雇主的帳戶使用乘車服務。企業更喜歡 B2B 模式,以簡化申請、行程追蹤和有效管理運輸成本。與B2C和P2P相比,B2B注重數量和合約基礎的穩定性,透過長期合約提供可預測的需求和潛在的更高盈利。 B2C 領域透過服務提供者提供共乘服務,這些服務商直接服務於個人消費者並提供通常使用私家車的交通服務。由於便利性、價格和可訪問性,消費者通常更喜歡 B2C 服務,因為這些服務可以透過行動應用程式按需提供。在P2P模式中,個人車主將自己的汽車出租給其他人,形成了一個去中心化的車輛共用網路。它是最以社區為中心的模式,與傳統的乘車共享服務不同,它允許車主將閒置資產收益。 P2P 模型依賴強大的信任社區,並且無需大型中心化工具即可擴展。然而,它們可能面臨監管障礙,並需要強大的使用者驗證系統來確保安全性和可靠性。
服務提供者:有競爭力的價格和可靠的品質正在推動OEM服務提供者的發展趨勢。
OEM(原始設備製造商)是指製造其他公司銷售的零件和設備的公司。在乘車共享的背景下,汽車製造商透過合作或推出自己的平台進入服務領域就是這種情況。由於車輛的品牌保證和質量,客戶通常傾向於選擇OEM提供的共乘產品。這些服務可能提供豪華車型、尖端技術和優質的乘車共享體驗。 OEM還可以提供與車輛內建功能和連接解決方案的無縫整合。私人乘車共享公司是獨立成立的公司,其唯一目的是提供共享交通服務。這些公司通常不製造車輛,而是透過與車主合作或租賃車輛來提供服務。客戶可能更喜歡私人供應商,因為它們方便、易於訪問、覆蓋範圍更大,而且價格往往更具競爭力。
區域洞察
在美洲,特別是在美國和加拿大,共乘服務已廣泛融入主要城市的交通網路中。由於強大的技術基礎設施、高智慧型手機普及以及年輕人逐漸遠離私家車,採用率很高。亞太地區的叫車產業呈現多元化,受到大量城市人口、技術使用不斷增加以及不斷變化的法規環境的推動。一些亞太國家/地區正在採取積極的擴大策略、付款系統的本地化調整以及食品配送等附加服務的整合以補充共乘服務。受不同經濟狀況、法規結構和旅行習慣的影響,EMEA(歐洲、中東和非洲)地區的共乘使用呈現出混合模式。歐洲的共乘場景在大都會圈具有強大的吸引力,並且非常注重環境永續性,這推動了電動和混合動力汽車共乘選擇的發展。在中東和非洲,共乘服務可滿足豪華車輛和日常交通需求,通常可以填補大眾交通工具網路的空白。在歐洲、中東和非洲地區,儘管市場成熟度各異,但生產往往專注於確保遵守當地法律、高服務品質和營運效率。
FPNV定位矩陣
FPNV定位矩陣對於評估共乘市場至關重要。我們檢視與業務策略和產品滿意度相關的關鍵指標,以對供應商進行全面評估。這種深入的分析使用戶能夠根據自己的要求做出明智的決策。根據評估,供應商被分為四個成功程度不同的像限:前沿(F)、探路者(P)、利基(N)和重要(V)。
市場佔有率分析
市場佔有率分析是一種綜合工具,可以對乘車共享市場中供應商的現狀進行深入而深入的研究。全面比較和分析供應商在整體收益、基本客群和其他關鍵指標方面的貢獻,以便更好地了解公司的績效及其在爭奪市場佔有率時面臨的挑戰。此外,該分析還提供了對該行業競爭特徵的寶貴見解,包括在研究基準年觀察到的累積、分散主導地位和合併特徵等因素。這種詳細程度的提高使供應商能夠做出更明智的決策並制定有效的策略,從而在市場上獲得競爭優勢。
1. 市場滲透率:提供有關主要企業所服務的市場的全面資訊。
2. 市場開拓:我們深入研究利潤豐厚的新興市場,並分析其在成熟細分市場的滲透率。
3. 市場多元化:提供有關新產品發布、開拓地區、最新發展和投資的詳細資訊。
4.競爭力評估與資訊:對主要企業的市場佔有率、策略、產品、認證、監管狀況、專利狀況、製造能力等進行全面評估。
5. 產品開發與創新:提供對未來技術、研發活動和突破性產品開發的見解。
1. 共乘市場的市場規模與預測是多少?
2.在乘車共享市場的預測期內,有哪些產品、細分市場、應用程式和領域需要考慮投資?
3.共享出行市場的技術趨勢和法規結構是什麼?
4.共享出行市場主要廠商的市場佔有率為何?
5.進入共享出行市場合適的型態或策略手段是什麼?
[187 Pages Report] The Ride Sharing Market size was estimated at USD 109.12 billion in 2023 and expected to reach USD 122.91 billion in 2024, at a CAGR 13.14% to reach USD 259.01 billion by 2030.
Ridesharing refers to the shared use of private vehicles in which riders make trips that are either simultaneously matched with others' routes or are facilitated via on-demand services that congregate multiple passengers headed in the same direction. This collaborative transportation mode leverages digital platforms, typically mobile apps, to connect passengers seeking rides with drivers who have empty seats in their cars. The expansion of ride-sharing can be attributed to various factors, including increasing smartphone penetration and a growing cultural acceptance of shared economy services. Urban centers, with their high population density and often inadequate parking facilities, are particularly conducive to ride-sharing. However, the safety of passengers and drivers, concerns over inadequate regulation, employment rights of ride-share drivers, and the impact on traditional taxi services impact their adoption. Service providers are ensuring background checks and training for drivers, establishing clearer employment guidelines, and fostering partnerships with cities to complement public transit options to tackle challenging concerns. Autonomous driving technology bears the potential to revolutionize the market by reducing operational costs and increasing safety. There is a growing opportunity to leverage data analytics for optimizing routes and demand forecasting, as well as a focus on expanding the electric and hybrid vehicle fleets to address environmental sustainability. The rise in smart city initiatives may further facilitate the growth of the ride-sharing ecosystem, creating a more connected and efficient urban mobility landscape.
KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
---|---|
Base Year [2023] | USD 109.12 billion |
Estimated Year [2024] | USD 122.91 billion |
Forecast Year [2030] | USD 259.01 billion |
CAGR (%) | 13.14% |
Commuting Distance: Cost-saving and comfortable options available for intracity rides
Intercity ride-sharing caters to customers requiring transportation between different cities. This segment is characterized by longer distances and is typically chosen for leisure trips, visiting family and friends, business meetings outside the home city, or commuting for those who live in one city and work in another. Intracity ride-sharing focuses on transportation within a single city and its surrounding suburbs. The key drivers for customer preferences in this segment include flexibility, speed, cost, and availability. Users often choose ride-sharing for daily commutes, short errands, and night-time travel when public transportation may be less available. Intracity ride-sharing services typically offer an array of options, including pooled rides for cost-saving, luxury options for a premium experience, and individual rides for convenience. These services widely adopt dynamic pricing models which can change based on demand and time of day. Compared to the intercity segment, intracity providers are more focused on digital innovations to enhance user experience and strive for shorter wait times and competitive pricing.
Vehicle Type: Potential to transport multiple passengers for longer distances car sharing
Bike-sharing systems have seen substantial growth in urban areas where traffic congestion and parking issues drive the need for alternative transportation. Bicycles serve as an eco-friendly, health-promoting means of transit, particularly suitable for short distances and last-mile connectivity. Car-sharing platforms are preferred for their convenience, comfort, and suitability for longer distances or group travel. They appeal to users who require the versatility of a personal vehicle without the costs of ownership. Motorized scooters, both kick and sit-down variants, are increasingly popular in cities for being nimble and easily accessible. They are favored for short rides and offer a swift option for navigating congested streets. Their low cost and ease of parking make them a favorable choice, especially among younger demographics. Bikes are the most environmentally friendly and cost-effective, often chosen for health benefits and ease of use in bicycle-friendly cities. Cars offer the greatest versatility and comfort for longer journeys or when traveling in a group, though they come with higher costs and are less effective in combating urban congestion. Scooters strike a balance between the two, providing quick and easy transport for short distances.
Business Model: Improved convenience and ease of access of business to consumer ridesharing segments
The B2B segment of the ride-sharing market caters to companies requiring transportation services for their employees or clients. This may include corporate accounts with ride-sharing platforms, where employees can utilize rides on the account of the employer. Companies prefer the B2B model for streamlined billing, ride tracking, and the ability to manage transportation expenses efficiently. Compared to B2C and P2P, B2B focuses on volume and contract-based stability, offering predictable demand and potentially higher profitability through long-term contracts. The B2C segment directly serves the individual consumer, offering rideshares from drivers who are often using their personal vehicles to provide transportation services. Consumers' preference for B2C services is often driven by convenience, price, and ease of access, as these services are available on-demand through mobile applications. In the P2P model, individual car owners rent out their vehicles to others, creating a decentralized network of vehicle sharing. This is the most community-centric model and differs from traditional ride-sharing services by enabling car owners to monetize their idle assets. The P2P model relies on a strong community of trust and can scale without the need for a large centralized fleet. However, it may face regulatory hurdles and require robust user verification systems to ensure safety and reliability.
Service Provider: Inclinations towards OEM service providers due to competitive pricing and reliable quality
Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) refer to corporations that produce parts and equipment that may be marketed by another company. In the context of ride-sharing, these are automobile manufacturers who have ventured into the service space either through collaborations or by launching their own platforms. Customers often gravitate towards OEM-provided ride-sharing for the brand assurance and quality of vehicles. These services may offer higher-end models and the latest technologies, which can lead to a premium ride-sharing experience. OEMs may also offer seamless integration with their vehicles' built-in features and connectivity solutions. Private ride-sharing companies are businesses independently established with the sole purpose of providing shared transport services. These companies usually do not manufacture vehicles but partner with vehicle owners or lease vehicles to provide their services. Customers may prefer private providers due to the convenience, ease of access, broader service areas, and often more competitive pricing.
Regional Insights
In the Americas, particularly in the United States and Canada, ride-sharing services are extensively integrated into the transportation fabric of major cities. Adoption rates are high due to the robust technological infrastructure, high smartphone penetration, and a shift away from private car ownership among younger demographics. The APAC region's ride-sharing industry is diverse, propelled by massive urban populations, rising technology use, and evolving regulatory environments. Some APAC countries have seen aggressive expansion strategies, local adaptation to payment systems, and the integration of additional services, such as food delivery, to complement their ride-sharing offerings. The EMEA region shows a mixed pattern in terms of ride-sharing usage, influenced by diverse economic conditions, regulatory frameworks, and mobility habits. Europe's ride-sharing scene has significant traction in metropolitan areas, with a strong focus on environmental sustainability, resulting in a push for electric and hybrid ride-sharing options. The Middle East and Africa have a more nascent but rapidly growing market where ride-sharing services cater to a mix of luxury and everyday transport needs, often filling gaps in public transportation networks. The production focus in EMEA tends to be on ensuring compliance with local laws, high service quality, and operational efficiency amidst varying levels of market maturity.
FPNV Positioning Matrix
The FPNV Positioning Matrix is pivotal in evaluating the Ride Sharing Market. It offers a comprehensive assessment of vendors, examining key metrics related to Business Strategy and Product Satisfaction. This in-depth analysis empowers users to make well-informed decisions aligned with their requirements. Based on the evaluation, the vendors are then categorized into four distinct quadrants representing varying levels of success: Forefront (F), Pathfinder (P), Niche (N), or Vital (V).
Market Share Analysis
The Market Share Analysis is a comprehensive tool that provides an insightful and in-depth examination of the current state of vendors in the Ride Sharing Market. By meticulously comparing and analyzing vendor contributions in terms of overall revenue, customer base, and other key metrics, we can offer companies a greater understanding of their performance and the challenges they face when competing for market share. Additionally, this analysis provides valuable insights into the competitive nature of the sector, including factors such as accumulation, fragmentation dominance, and amalgamation traits observed over the base year period studied. With this expanded level of detail, vendors can make more informed decisions and devise effective strategies to gain a competitive edge in the market.
Key Company Profiles
The report delves into recent significant developments in the Ride Sharing Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Beep, Inc., BlaBlaCar, Bolt Technology OU, Cabify Espana S.L.U., Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc., Curb Mobility, LLC, Didi chuxing Technology Co. Ltd., FOD Mobility UK Ltd., GATEWAY DIGITAL, Getaround, Inc., Gettaxi Limited, Grab Holding, Inc., Lime Micromobility, Lyft, Inc., Mobisoft Infotech, Moovit Inc., Ola by ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd., PT GoTo Gojek Tokopedia Tbk, Quick Ride by iDisha Info Labs Pvt Ltd., Ridecell Inc., SkedGo Pty. Ltd., Trafi Ltd., TRANSDEV Group, Turo Inc., Twogo by Schwarz Mobility Solutions GmbH, Uber Technologies Inc., and Wingz, Inc..
Market Segmentation & Coverage
1. Market Penetration: It presents comprehensive information on the market provided by key players.
2. Market Development: It delves deep into lucrative emerging markets and analyzes the penetration across mature market segments.
3. Market Diversification: It provides detailed information on new product launches, untapped geographic regions, recent developments, and investments.
4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: It conducts an exhaustive assessment of market shares, strategies, products, certifications, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities of the leading players.
5. Product Development & Innovation: It offers intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments.
1. What is the market size and forecast of the Ride Sharing Market?
2. Which products, segments, applications, and areas should one consider investing in over the forecast period in the Ride Sharing Market?
3. What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Ride Sharing Market?
4. What is the market share of the leading vendors in the Ride Sharing Market?
5. Which modes and strategic moves are suitable for entering the Ride Sharing Market?