Product Code: TC 8832
The Knowledge Graph market is estimated at USD 1,068.4 million in 2024 to USD 6,938.4 million by 2030, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 36.6%. The construction of intelligent knowledge graphs through AI is expected to change how organizations deal with large datasets. The effort of human intervention is drastically reduced when it comes to identifying and extricating relationships between different data points. The automation includes the processes carried out by most types of AI-driven tools such as natural language processing (NLP), machine learning algorithms, etc., to automatically interpret, unstructured or structured data, identify relevant patterns, and correlate such relevant information. This automation speeds up the construction of the graphs and at the same time increases accuracy, ensuring that the relationships represented in it are as relevant and up to date as possible to an end user.
Scope of the Report |
Years Considered for the Study | 2019-2030 |
Base Year | 2024 |
Forecast Period | 2024-2030 |
Units Considered | Value (USD Million) |
Segments | By Solutions, Services, Model Type, Vertical. |
Regions covered | North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, Latin America |
"By solution, Graph Database Engine segment to hold the largest market size during the forecast period."
Graph Database Engine is a specialized type of database, designed specifically for the efficient storage, management and retrieval of graph data entities (nodes) related by graph relationships (edges). Graph databases do not organize data in tables as in traditional relational systems, but rather as relationships, making them useful in application scenarios where data relationships are paramount, such as social networks, recommendation engines, and fraud detection. It allows high-speed querying and traversing complex and heavily linked datasets, thus enables a more natural, intuitive, and flexible mechanism of data querying. It further supports graph-specific query languages such as SPARQL and Cypher, which are optimized for querying relationships, thus affording better performance and scalability for graph applications.
"The services segment to register the fastest growth rate during the forecast period."
Knowledge graph services encompass professional and managed services to an organization for deploying, enhancing, and maintaining knowledge graph solutions. Professional services consist of consulting on the design and development of a strategy, integration of the data, and the creation of a custom-built knowledge graph relevant to a business. On the other hand, managed services offer support maintenance, and monitoring of the knowledge graph platform for performance, scalability, and security. These services, in their own way, assist clients in sourcing knowledge graphs to their advantage in terms of getting better data, decision intelligence, and AI, and without the burden of their internal management, which is a resource-intensive and cumbersome process.
"Asia Pacific to witness the highest market growth rate during the forecast period."
In Asia Pacific, the landscape is characterized by initiatives and innovations that try to help adopt and apply graph technologies across the region. In 2021, Neo4j launched Graphs4APAC initiative, which provides free training, materials, and tools to professionals across Asia Pacific to develop and improve their knowledge and skills in graph technology. This open-source initiative encourages collaborative and local adaptation, and has been successfully implemented in, Indonesia and Singapore. Fujitsu, also, strives to expand the frameworks of knowledge graphs fed by artificial intelligence in the Generative AI Accelerator Challenge (GENIAC) program that focuses on producing dedicated large language models (LLMs) that generate knowledge graphs and allow for inferring such graphs. These are emerging indicators that are significant in portraying how much the region has begun to pay attention to applying knowledge graphs across innovative platforms and data-driven solutions.
In-depth interviews have been conducted with chief executive officers (CEOs), Directors, and other executives from various key organizations operating in the Knowledge Graph market.
- By Company Type: Tier 1 - 40%, Tier 2 - 35%, and Tier 3 - 25%
- By Designation: C-level -40%, D-level - 35%, and Others - 25%
- By Region: North America - 35%, Europe - 40%, Asia Pacific - 20, RoW-5%
The major players in the Knowledge Graph market include IBM Corporation (US), Oracle (US), Microsoft Corporation (US), AWS (US), Neo4j (US), Progress Software (US), TigerGraph (US), Stardog (US), Franz Inc (US), Ontotext (Bulgaria), Openlink Software (US), Graphwise (US), Altair (US), Bitnine ( South Korea) ArangoDB (US), Fluree (US), Memgraph (UK), Datavid (UK), and SAP (Germany), GraphBase (Australia), Metaphacts (Germany), Relational AI (US), Wisecube (US), Smabbler (Poland), Onlim (Austria), Graphaware (UK), Diffbot (US), Eccenca (Germany), Conversight (US), , Semantic Web Company (Austria), ESRI (US). These players have adopted various growth strategies, such as partnerships, agreements and collaborations, new product launches, enhancements, and acquisitions to expand their Knowledge Graph market footprint.
Research Coverage
The market study covers the Knowledge Graph market size across different segments. It aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential across various segments, including by offering (solutions (enterprise knowledge graph platform, graph database engine, knowledge management toolset), services ( professional services, managed services), by model type (Resource Description Framework (RDF) Triple Stores, Labeled Property Graph (LPG)), by applications (data governance and master data management, data analytics and business intelligence, knowledge and content management , virtual assistants, self-service data and digital asset discovery, product and configuration management, infrastructure and asset management, process optimization and resource management, risk management, compliance, regulatory reporting, market and customer intelligence, sales optimization, other applications), by vertical (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI), retail and eCommerce, healthcare, life sciences, and pharmaceuticals telecom and technology, government, manufacturing and automotive, media & entertainment, energy, utilities and infrastructure, travel and hospitality, transportation and logistics, other vertical), and Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America). The study includes an in-depth competitive analysis of the leading market players, their company profiles, key observations related to product and business offerings, recent developments, and market strategies.
Key Benefits of Buying the Report
The report will help the market leaders/new entrants with information on the closest approximations of the global Knowledge Graph market's revenue numbers and subsegments. This report will help stakeholders understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights to position their businesses better and plan suitable go-to-market strategies. Moreover, the report will provide insights for stakeholders to understand the market's pulse and provide them with information on key market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.
The report provides insights on the following pointers:
Analysis of key drivers (rising demand for AI/generative AI solutions, rapid growth in data volume and complexity, growing demand for semantic search), restraints (data quality and Integration challenges, scalability Issues) opportunities (data unification and rapid proliferation of knowledge graphs, increasing adoption in healthcare and life sciences), and challenges (lack of expertise and awareness, standardization and interoperability) influencing the growth of the Knowledge Graph market.
Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on upcoming technologies, research & development activities, and new product & service launches in the Knowledge Graph market.
Market Development: The report provides comprehensive information about lucrative markets and analyses the Knowledge Graph market across various regions.
Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products & services, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the Knowledge Graph market.
Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies and service offerings of leading include include IBM Corporation (US), Oracle (US), Microsoft Corporation (US), AWS (US), Neo4j (US), Progress Software (US), TigerGraph (US), Stardog (US), Franz Inc (US), Ontotext (Bulgaria), Openlink Software (US), Graphwise (US), Altair (US), Bitnine ( South Korea) ArangoDB (US), Fluree (US), Memgraph (UK), GraphBase (Australia), Metaphacts (Germany), Relational AI (US), Wisecube (US), Smabbler (Poland), Onlim (Austria), Graphaware (UK), Diffbot (US), Eccenca (Germany), Conversight (US), , Semantic Web Company (Austria), ESRI (US), Datavid (UK), and SAP (Germany).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
- 1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
- 1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
- 1.2.1 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
- 1.3 STUDY SCOPE
- 1.3.1 MARKET SEGMENTATION
- 1.3.2 YEARS CONSIDERED
- 1.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
- 1.5 STAKEHOLDERS
- 1.6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 2.1 RESEARCH DATA
- 2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
- 2.1.1.1 Key data from secondary sources
- 2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
- 2.1.2.1 Primary interviews with experts
- 2.1.2.2 Breakdown of primary interviews
- 2.1.2.3 Key insights from industry experts
- 2.2 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
- 2.2.1 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
- 2.2.1.1 Supply-side analysis
- 2.2.2 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
- 2.2.2.1 Demand-side analysis
- 2.3 DATA TRIANGULATION
- 2.4 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
- 2.5 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
- 2.6 RISK ASSESSMENT
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS
- 4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR KEY PLAYERS IN KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET
- 4.2 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, BY OFFERING
- 4.3 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, BY SERVICE
- 4.4 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, BY MODEL TYPE
- 4.5 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, BY APPLICATION 60
- 4.6 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, BY VERTICAL
- 4.7 NORTH AMERICA: KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES
5 MARKET OVERVIEW AND INDUSTRY TRENDS
- 5.1 INTRODUCTION
- 5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS
- 5.2.1 DRIVERS
- 5.2.1.1 Rising demand for AI/generative AI solutions
- 5.2.1.2 Rapid growth in data volume and complexity
- 5.2.1.3 Growing demand for semantic search
- 5.2.2 RESTRAINTS
- 5.2.2.1 Data quality and integration challenges
- 5.2.2.2 Navigation of saturated data management tool landscape
- 5.2.2.3 Scalability issues
- 5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
- 5.2.3.1 Leveraging LLMs to reduce knowledge graph construction costs
- 5.2.3.2 Data unification and rapid proliferation of knowledge graphs
- 5.2.3.3 Increasing adoption in healthcare and life sciences to revolutionize data management and enhance patient outcomes
- 5.2.4 CHALLENGES
- 5.2.4.1 Lack of expertise and awareness
- 5.2.4.2 Standardization and interoperability
- 5.2.4.3 Difficulty in demonstrating full value of knowledge graphs through single use cases
- 5.3 TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER BUSINESS
- 5.4 PRICING ANALYSIS
- 5.4.1 PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS, BY SOLUTION
- 5.4.2 INDICATIVE PRICING ANALYSIS OF KEY PLAYERS
- 5.5 SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
- 5.6 ECOSYSTEM
- 5.7 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
- 5.7.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES
- 5.7.1.1 Graph Databases (GDB)
- 5.7.1.2 Semantic web technologies
- 5.7.1.3 Generative AI and Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- 5.7.1.4 GraphRAG
- 5.7.2 COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
- 5.7.2.1 Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)
- 5.7.2.2 Big data
- 5.7.2.3 Graph Neural Networks (GNNS)
- 5.7.2.4 Cloud computing
- 5.7.2.5 Vector databases and Full-Text Search Engines (FTS)
- 5.7.2.6 Multi-model databases
- 5.7.3 ADJACENT TECHNOLOGIES
- 5.7.3.1 Digital twin
- 5.7.3.2 Internet of Things (IoT)
- 5.7.3.3 Blockchain
- 5.7.3.4 Edge computing
- 5.8 PATENT ANALYSIS
- 5.8.1 METHODOLOGY
- 5.8.1.1 List of major patents
- 5.9 KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS, 2024-2025
- 5.10 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
- 5.10.1 REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
- 5.10.2 KEY REGULATIONS
- 5.10.2.1 North America
- 5.10.2.1.1 SCR 17: Artificial Intelligence Bill (California)
- 5.10.2.1.2 S1103: Artificial Intelligence Automated Decision Bill (Connecticut)
- 5.10.2.1.3 National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act (NAIIA)
- 5.10.2.1.4 The Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) - Canada
- 5.10.2.2 Europe
- 5.10.2.2.1 The European Union (EU) - Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA)
- 5.10.2.2.2 EU Data Governance Act
- 5.10.2.2.3 General Data Protection Regulation (Europe)
- 5.10.2.3 Asia Pacific
- 5.10.2.3.1 Interim Administrative Measures for Generative Artificial Intelligence Services (China)
- 5.10.2.3.2 The National AI Strategy (Singapore)
- 5.10.2.3.3 The Hiroshima AI Process Comprehensive Policy Framework (Japan)
- 5.10.2.4 Middle East & Africa
- 5.10.2.4.1 The National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence (UAE)
- 5.10.2.4.2 The National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (Qatar)
- 5.10.2.4.3 The AI Ethics Principles and Guidelines (Dubai)
- 5.10.2.5 Latin America
- 5.10.2.5.1 The Santiago Declaration (Chile)
- 5.10.2.5.2 The Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Strategy (EBIA)
- 5.11 PORTER'S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
- 5.11.1 THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
- 5.11.2 THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
- 5.11.3 BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
- 5.11.4 BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
- 5.11.5 INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY 92
- 5.12 KEY STAKEHOLDERS & BUYING CRITERIA
- 5.12.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
- 5.12.2 BUYING CRITERIA
- 5.13 BRIEF HISTORY OF KNOWLEDGE GRAPH
- 5.14 STEPS TO BUILD KNOWLEDGE GRAPH
- 5.14.1 DEFINE OBJECTIVES
- 5.14.2 ENGAGE STAKEHOLDERS
- 5.14.3 IDENTIFY KNOWLEDGE DOMAIN
- 5.14.4 GATHER AND ANALYZE DATA
- 5.14.5 CLEAN AND PREPROCESS DATA
- 5.14.6 CREATE SEMANTIC DATA MODEL
- 5.14.7 SCHEMA DEFINITION
- 5.14.8 DATA INTEGRATION
- 5.14.9 HARMONIZATION OF DATA
- 5.14.10 BUILD KNOWLEDGE GRAPH
- 5.14.11 AUGMENT GRAPH
- 5.14.12 TESTING AND VALIDATION
- 5.14.13 MAXIMIZE USABILITY
- 5.14.14 CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE AND EVOLUTION
- 5.15 IMPACT OF AI/GENERATIVE AI ON KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET
- 5.15.1 USE CASES OF GENERATIVE KNOWLEDGE GRAPH
- 5.16 INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO
- 5.17 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
- 5.17.1 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATOR LEVERAGED ONTOTEXT'S SOLUTIONS TO MODERNIZE ASSET MANAGEMENT
- 5.17.2 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC STREAMLINED MEDICAL SUPPLY CHAIN USING NEO4J'S GRAPH DATA SCIENCE SOLUTION
- 5.17.3 NATIONAL RETAIL CHAIN FROM UK ENHANCED OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY USING TIGERGRAPHS'S SOLUTION
- 5.17.4 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USED STARDOG TO LEAD SMART BUILDING TRANSFORMATION
- 5.17.5 MEDIA ORGANIZATION USED PROGRESS SEMAPHORE TO CLASSIFY CONTENT FOR BETTER AUDIENCE ENGAGEMENT
- 5.17.6 YAHOO7 REPRESENTED CONTENT WITHIN KNOWLEDGE GRAPH WITH ASSISTANCE OF BLAZEGRAPH
- 5.17.7 DATABASE GROUP HELPED SPRINGERMATERIALS ACCELERATE RESEARCH WITH SEMANTIC SEARCH
- 5.17.8 RFS OPTIMIZED ITS GLOBAL PRODUCT AND INVENTORY MANAGEMENT BY USING ECCENCA'S SOLUTION 104
6 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, BY OFFERING
- 6.1 INTRODUCTION
- 6.1.1 OFFERINGS: KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET DRIVERS
- 6.2 SOLUTIONS
- 6.2.1 SPIKE IN DEMAND FOR SOPHISTICATED DATA MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS TO DRIVE MARKET
- 6.2.2 ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE GRAPH PLATFORM
- 6.2.2.1 Need to improve discovery of data, promote better decision-making, and enable real-time insights using semantic technologies to propel market
- 6.2.3 GRAPH DATABASE ENGINE
- 6.2.3.1 Features like parallel query execution and AI-driven insights in graph database engines to accelerate market growth
- 6.2.4 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TOOLSET
- 6.2.4.1 Knowledge management toolsets to enhance operational efficiency by enabling seamless access to organizational knowledge
- 6.3 SERVICES
- 6.3.1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
- 6.3.2 MANAGED SERVICES
7 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, BY MODEL TYPE
- 7.1 INTRODUCTION
- 7.1.1 MODEL TYPES: KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET DRIVERS
- 7.2 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK (RDF) TRIPLE STORES
- 7.2.1 RDF-BASED KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS TO FACILITATE APPLICATIONS REQUIRING SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY
- 7.3 LABELED PROPERTY GRAPH (LPG)
- 7.3.1 LOGICAL INFERENCE, KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, AND STRUCTURED REPRESENTATION OF DATA TO BOOST MARKET GROWTH
8 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, BY APPLICATION
- 8.1 INTRODUCTION
- 8.1.1 APPLICATIONS: KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET DRIVERS
- 8.2 DATA GOVERNANCE AND MASTER DATA MANAGEMENT
- 8.2.1 NEED FOR ENHANCED SEARCH FUNCTIONALITIES TO BOLSTER MARKET GROWTH
- 8.3 DATA ANALYTICS & BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE
- 8.3.1 INTEGRATION OF KNOWLEDGE FROM SEVERAL DISCIPLINES AND OFFERING PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS TO BOOST MARKET GROWTH
- 8.4 KNOWLEDGE & CONTENT MANAGEMENT
- 8.4.1 WIDESPREAD KNOWLEDGE OF INTRICATE IDEAS THROUGH CROSS-DOMAIN INFORMATION INTEGRATION TO BOOST MARKET
- 8.5 VIRTUAL ASSISTANTS, SELF-SERVICE DATA, AND DIGITAL ASSET DISCOVERY
- 8.5.1 STREAMLINING OF TEAMWORK AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE TO ACCELERATE MARKET GROWTH
- 8.6 PRODUCT & CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
- 8.6.1 NEED TO ENSURE ACCURACY AND REDUCES TIME-TO-MARKET ENHANCING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION TO FUEL MARKET GROWTH
- 8.7 INFRASTRUCTURE & ASSET MANAGEMENT
- 8.7.1 INFRASTRUCTURE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT TO REDUCE DOWNTIME AND EXTEND ASSET LIFECYCLES THROUGH INFORMED DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
- 8.8 PROCESS OPTIMIZATION & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
- 8.8.1 NEED FOR REAL-TIME RESOURCE UTILIZATION MONITORING ACROSS DIFFERENT PROJECTS OR DEPARTMENTS TO PROPEL MARKET
- 8.9 RISK MANAGEMENT, COMPLIANCE, AND REGULATORY REPORTING
- 8.9.1 RISK MANAGEMENT, COMPLIANCE, AND REGULATORY REPORTING TO HELP MAP DATA FLOWS, RELATIONSHIPS, AND CONTROLS TO IDENTIFY VULNERABILITIES AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE
- 8.10 MARKET & CUSTOMER INTELLIGENCE AND SALES OPTIMIZATION
- 8.10.1 NEED TO IDENTIFY TRENDS INFORMING TARGETED MARKETING STRATEGIES TO DRIVE MARKET
- 8.11 OTHER APPLICATIONS
9 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, BY VERTICAL
- 9.1 INTRODUCTION
- 9.1.1 VERTICALS: KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET DRIVERS
- 9.2 BFSI
- 9.2.1 INCREASING NEED TO MANAGE COMPLEX DATA TO SUPPORT MARKET GROWTH
- 9.2.2 CASE STUDY
- 9.2.2.1 Anti-money laundering (AML)
- 9.2.2.1.1 Major US Financial Institutions enhanced anti-money laundering capabilities with TigerGraph
- 9.2.2.2 Fraud detection & risk management
- 9.2.2.2.1 BNP Paribas Personal Finance achieved 20% fraud reduction with Neo4j Graph Database
- 9.2.2.3 Identity & access management
- 9.2.2.3.1 Intuit safeguarded data of 100 million customers with Neo4j
- 9.2.2.4 Risk management
- 9.2.2.4.1 Global bank enhanced trade surveillance for risk management in BFSI
- 9.2.2.5 Data integration & governance
- 9.2.2.5.1 Optimizing data integration and governance for real-time risk management and compliance
- 9.2.2.6 Operational resilience for bank IT systems
- 9.2.2.6.1 Basel Institute on Governance enhanced asset recovery and financial intelligence with knowledge graphs for global financial institutions with Onto text 141
- 9.2.2.7 Regulatory compliance
- 9.2.2.7.1 Multinational auditing company enhanced regulatory compliance and operational efficiency with knowledge graphs of Ontotext
- 9.2.2.8 Customer 360° view
- 9.2.2.8.1 Intuit enhanced security and data protection using Neo4j knowledge graph for customer data
- 9.2.2.9 Know Your Customer (KYC) processes
- 9.2.2.9.1 AI-powered knowledge graphs streamlined KYC compliance and adverse media analysis in financial services
- 9.2.2.10 Market analysis and trend detection
- 9.2.2.10.1 Leading investment bank enhanced investment insights through comprehensive company knowledge graph
- 9.2.2.11 Policy impact analysis
- 9.2.2.11.1 Delinian enhanced content production and analysis with semantic publishing platform
- 9.2.2.12 Customer support
- 9.2.2.12.1 Banks and insurance companies improved AI-powered knowledge graphs to revolutionize customer support in BFSI
- 9.2.2.13 Self-service data & digital asset discovery and data integration & governance
- 9.2.2.13.1 HSBC revolutionized data governance with knowledge graphs in BFSI
- 9.3 RETAIL & ECOMMERCE
- 9.3.1 NEED TO OPTIMIZE INVENTORY MANAGEMENT FACILITATED BY KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS TO DRIVE MARKET
- 9.3.2 CASE STUDY
- 9.3.2.1 Fraud detection in eCommerce
- 9.3.2.1.1 PayPal enhanced fraud detection with knowledge graphs
- 9.3.2.2 Dynamic pricing optimization
- 9.3.2.2.1 Belgian company revolutionized new product development with food pairing knowledge graph
- 9.3.2.3 Personalized recommendations
- 9.3.2.3.1 Xandr created industry-leading identity graph for personalized advertising with TigerGraph
- 9.3.2.4 Market basket analysis
- 9.3.2.4.1 eCommerce giants boosted retail sales with knowledge graph-powered market basket analysis
- 9.3.2.5 Customer experience enhancement
- 9.3.2.5.1 Retailers improved store operations and increased customer satisfaction using TigerGraph
- 9.3.2.5.2 Edamam enhanced food knowledge and user experience with knowledge graphs
- 9.3.2.6 Social media influence on buying behavior
- 9.3.2.6.1 Leveraging knowledge graphs to track social media influence on buying behavior at Coca-Cola
- 9.3.2.7 Churn prediction & prevention
- 9.3.2.7.1 Reduction of customer churn with knowledge graphs
- 9.3.2.8 Product configuration & recommendation
- 9.3.2.8.1 Leading automotive manufacturer personalized customer experience with knowledge graphs for product configuration
- 9.3.2.9 Customer segmentation & targeting
- 9.3.2.9.1 Xbox enhanced user experience with TigerGraph for better customer insights and loyalty
- 9.3.2.10 Customer 360° view
- 9.3.2.10.1 Technology giant enhanced customer engagement with TigerGraph for personalized experiences
- 9.3.2.11 Review & reputation management
- 9.3.2.11.1 Neo4j managed brand reputation with knowledge graphs at TripAdvisor
- 9.3.2.12 Customer support
- 9.3.2.12.1 Retailer enhanced operations and customer satisfaction with TigerGraph for root cause analysis
- 9.4 HEALTHCARE, LIFE SCIENCES, AND PHARMACEUTICALS
- 9.4.1 NEED TO REVOLUTIONIZE HEALTHCARE PRACTICES TO PROPEL ADOPTION OF KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS
- 9.4.2 CASE STUDY
- 9.4.2.1 Drug discovery & development
- 9.4.2.1.1 Early Drug R&D center accelerated cancer research with Ontotext's target discovery
- 9.4.2.1.2 Ontotext's Target Discovery accelerated Alzheimer's breakthroughs with knowledge graphs
- 9.4.2.2 Clinical trial management
- 9.4.2.2.1 NuMedii streamlined clinical trial management with AI-powered knowledge graphs with Ontotext
- 9.4.2.3 Medical claim processing
- 9.4.2.3.1 UnitedHealth Group revolutionized medical claim processing with TigerGraph
- 9.4.2.4 Clinical intelligence
- 9.4.2.4.1 Leading US Children's Hospital gained deeper insights into impact of its faculty research
- 9.4.2.5 Healthcare provider network analysis
- 9.4.2.5.1 Amgen improved quality of healthcare by identifying influencers and referral networks using TigerGraph
- 9.4.2.6 Customer support
- 9.4.2.6.1 Exact Sciences Corporation revolutionized customer support in healthcare with a knowledge graph-powered 360° View
- 9.4.2.7 Patient journey & care pathway analysis
- 9.4.2.7.1 Care-for-Rare Foundation at Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital transformed pediatric care pathways with Neo4j's clinical knowledge graph 153
- 9.4.2.8 Self-service data & digital asset discovery
- 9.4.2.8.1 Boehringer Ingelheim accelerating pharmaceutical innovation with Stardog Knowledge Graph
- 9.5 TELECOM & TECHNOLOGY
- 9.5.1 NEED TO OPTIMIZE INTRICATE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AND CUSTOMIZED SERVICE OFFERINGS TO FUEL MARKET GROWTH
- 9.5.2 CASE STUDY
- 9.5.2.1 Network optimization & management
- 9.5.2.1.1 Cyber resilience leader scaled next-generation cybersecurity with TigerGraph to combat evolving threats
- 9.5.2.2 Network security analysis
- 9.5.2.2.1 Multinational cybersecurity and defense company accelerated risk identification in cybersecurity with knowledge graphs with Ontotext
- 9.5.2.3 Identity & access management
- 9.5.2.3.1 Technology giant improved customer experiences with TigerGraph
- 9.5.2.4 IT asset management
- 9.5.2.4.1 Orange used Thing'in to build digital twin platform
- 9.5.2.5 IoT device management & connectivity
- 9.5.2.5.1 AWS enhanced IoT device management with Amazon Neptune's scalable graph database solutions
- 9.5.2.6 Metadata enrichment
- 9.5.2.6.1 Cisco utilized Neo4j to enhance and assign metadata to its vast document collection
- 9.5.2.7 Data integration & governance
- 9.5.2.7.1 Dun & Bradstreet enhanced compliance with Neo4j's graph technology
- 9.5.2.8 Self-service data & digital asset discovery
- 9.5.2.8.1 Telecom provider optimized telecom operations with Neo4j's self-service data and digital asset discovery
- 9.5.2.9 Service incident management
- 9.5.2.9.1 BT Group revolutionizing telecom inventory management with Neo4j knowledge graph
- 9.6 GOVERNMENT
- 9.6.1 SPEEDY DATA INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TO BOOST MARKET GROWTH
- 9.6.2 CASE STUDY
- 9.6.2.1 Government service optimization
- 9.6.2.1.1 LODAC Museum project, initiated by Japan's National Institute of Informatics (NII), enhanced academic access to cultural heritage data through Linked Open Data
- 9.6.2.2 Legislative & regulatory analysis
- 9.6.2.2.1 Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) enhanced knowledge discovery with knowledge graphs at the IDB 159
- 9.6.2.3 Crisis management & disaster response planning
- 9.6.2.3.1 Knowledge graphs enhanced crisis response for real-time decision-making
- 9.6.2.4 Environmental impact analysis and ESG
- 9.6.2.4.1 Vienna University of Technology transformed architectural design with ECOLOPES knowledge graph
- 9.6.2.5 Social network analysis for security & law enforcement
- 9.6.2.5.1 Social Network Analysis strengthened security via knowledge graphs
- 9.6.2.6 Policy Impact Analysis
- 9.6.2.6.1 Governments leveraged knowledge graphs for effective policy impact analysis
- 9.6.2.7 Knowledge management
- 9.6.2.7.1 Ellas leveraged Graphdb's knowledge graphs to bridge gender gaps in STEM leadership
- 9.6.2.8 Data integration & governance
- 9.6.2.8.1 Government agency took digital and print library services to next level partnering with metaphacts and Ontotext
- 9.7 MANUFACTURING & AUTOMOTIVE
- 9.7.1 EASY PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE AND DECREASE IN DOWNTIME TO SUPPORT MARKET GROWTH
- 9.7.2 CASE STUDY
- 9.7.2.1 Equipment maintenance and predictive maintenance
- 9.7.2.1.1 Ford Motor Company enhanced production efficiency with TigerGraph for predictive maintenance
- 9.7.2.2 Product lifecycle management
- 9.7.2.2.1 Leading European manufacturer of electrical components enhanced product discoverability through semantic knowledge graphs
- 9.7.2.3 Manufacturing process optimization
- 9.7.2.3.1 Production streamlined efficiency with knowledge graphs
- 9.7.2.4 Enhance vehicle safety & reliability
- 9.7.2.4.1 Knowledge graphs improved vehicle safety with predictive maintenance
- 9.7.2.5 Optimization of industrial processes
- 9.7.2.5.1 Leading manufacturer of Building Automation Systems (BAS) graphs improved vehicle safety with Ontotext's GraphDB
- 9.7.2.6 Root cause analysis
- 9.7.2.6.1 Root Cause Analysis uncovered process failures with using knowledge graphs
- 9.7.2.7 Inventory management & demand forecasting
- 9.7.2.7.1 Knowledge graphs optimized inventory and demand forecasting with knowledge graphs
- 9.7.2.8 Service incident management
- 9.7.2.8.1 Knowledge graphs accelerated service incident resolution with knowledge graphs
- 9.7.2.9 Staff & resource allocation
- 9.7.2.9.1 Knowledge graphs optimized staff and resource allocation with knowledge graphs
- 9.7.2.10 Product configuration & recommendation
- 9.7.2.10.1 Leading Building Automation Systems (BAS) manufacturers used Brick schema to represent BAS components and their complex interactions
- 9.8 MEDIA & ENTERTAINMENT
- 9.8.1 NEED TO IMPROVE CONTENT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES AND BETTER DATA-DRIVEN DECISIONS TO FOSTER MARKET GROWTH
- 9.8.2 CASE STUDY
- 9.8.2.1 Content recommendation & personalization
- 9.8.2.1.1 Leading television broadcaster streamlined data management and improved search efficiency with knowledge graphs
- 9.8.2.2 Audience segmentation & targeting
- 9.8.2.2.1 KT Corporation enhanced IPTV Content Discovery with semantic search for better audience targeting
- 9.8.2.3 Social media influence analysis
- 9.8.2.3.1 Myntelligence used TigerGraph's advanced graph analytics to analyze relationships and interactions
- 9.8.2.4 Copyright & licensing management
- 9.8.2.4.1 British Museum and Europeana leveraged knowledge graphs for efficient content management and licensing in cultural heritage
- 9.8.2.5 Self-service data & digital asset discovery
- 9.8.2.5.1 BBC transformed content management with semantic publishing for enhanced user experience
- 9.8.2.6 Content recommendation systems
- 9.8.2.6.1 STM publisher leveraged knowledge platform for enhanced content recommendation
- 9.8.2.7 User engagement analysis
- 9.8.2.7.1 Bulgarian media company leveraged Ontotext's knowledge graphs for enhanced user engagement and ad targeting
- 9.8.2.8 Knowledge management
- 9.8.2.8.1 Rappler empowered transparent elections with first Philippine Politics Knowledge Graph
- 9.8.2.8.2 Perfect Memory and Ontotext developed custom data program platform based on knowledge graph solution to streamline data management
- 9.9 ENERGY, UTILITIES, AND INFRASTRUCTURE
- 9.9.1 DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES TO DRIVE DEMAND FOR KNOWLEDGE GRAPH SOLUTIONS
- 9.9.2 CASE STUDY
- 9.9.2.1 Grid management
- 9.9.2.1.1 Transmission Systems Operator (TSO) modernized asset management with knowledge graphs for enhanced grid reliability
- 9.9.2.2 Energy trading optimization
- 9.9.2.2.1 Global energy and commodities markets information provider gained enhanced operational efficiencies with semantic information extraction
- 9.9.2.3 Renewable energy integration & optimization
- 9.9.2.3.1 State Grid Corporation of China created speedy energy management system with assistance of TigerGraph
- 9.9.2.4 Public infrastructure management
- 9.9.2.4.1 Knowledge graphs enhanced infrastructure management for better decision-making
- 9.9.2.5 Customer engagement & billing
- 9.9.2.5.1 Knowledge graphs streamlined customer engagement and billing
- 9.9.2.6 Environmental impact analysis & ESG
- 9.9.2.6.1 Improved environmental impact analysis with knowledge graphs for ESG reporting
- 9.9.2.7 Service incident management
- 9.9.2.7.1 Enxchange transformed service incident management in energy with graph-based digital twins
- 9.9.2.8 Staff & resource allocation
- 9.9.2.8.1 Knowledge graphs optimized staff and resource allocation for efficient operations
- 9.9.2.9 Railway asset management
- 9.9.2.9.1 Railway asset management with graph databases enhanced connectivity and efficiency
- 9.10 TRAVEL & HOSPITALITY
- 9.10.1 NEED FOR KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS TO HELP DEVELOP INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES TO DRIVE MARKET
- 9.10.2 CASE STUDY
- 9.10.2.1 Personalized travel recommendations
- 9.10.2.1.1 Travel personalization with knowledge graphs for tailored recommendations
- 9.10.2.2 Dynamic pricing optimization
- 9.10.2.2.1 Marriott International implemented knowledge graph technology for dynamic pricing and revenue optimization
- 9.10.2.3 Customer journey mapping
- 9.10.2.3.1 Knowledge graphs mapped customer journey for enhanced travel experiences
- 9.10.2.4 Booking & reservation optimization
- 9.10.2.4.1 WestJet Airlines transformed flight scheduling into a seamless, customer-friendly experience with Neo4j
- 9.10.2.5 Customer experience enhancement
- 9.10.2.5.1 Airbnb transformed customer experience with unified data and actionable insights with Neo4j graph database
- 9.10.2.6 Product configuration and recommendation
- 9.10.2.6.1 Knowledge graphs streamlined product configuration and recommendations
- 9.11 TRANSPORTATION & LOGISTICS
- 9.11.1 NEED FOR DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES TO BOLSTER MARKET GROWTH
- 9.11.2 CASE STUDY
- 9.11.2.1 Route optimization & fleet management
- 9.11.2.1.1 Transport for London (TfL) optimized route management and incident response with digital twin
- 9.11.2.2 Supply chain visibility
- 9.11.2.2.1 Knowledge graphs enhanced supply chain visibility with real-time insights
- 9.11.2.3 Equipment maintenance & predictive maintenance
- 9.11.2.3.1 Knowledge graphs optimized equipment maintenance with predictive insights via knowledge graphs
- 9.11.2.4 Supply chain management
- 9.11.2.4.1 Knowledge graphs streamlined supply chain management for better coordination
- 9.11.2.5 Vendor & supplier analysis
- 9.11.2.5.1 Vendor and supplier analysis with knowledge graphs for smarter sourcing
- 9.11.2.6 Operational efficiency & decision making
- 9.11.2.6.1 Careem improved operational efficiency through fraud detection
- 9.12 OTHER VERTICALS
10 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH MARKET, BY REGION
- 10.1 INTRODUCTION
- 10.2 NORTH AMERICA
- 10.2.1 NORTH AMERICA: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
- 10.2.2 US
- 10.2.2.1 Increasing need for structured data analytics and interoperability to drive market
- 10.2.3 CANADA
- 10.2.3.1 Increasing complexity of data and demand for efficient data to propel market
- 10.3 EUROPE
- 10.3.1 EUROPE: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
- 10.3.2 UK
- 10.3.2.1 Increasing complexity of data and demand for advanced data integration solutions to fuel market growth
- 10.3.3 GERMANY
- 10.3.3.1 Focus on Industry 4.0 to drive demand for knowledge graph
- 10.3.4 FRANCE
- 10.3.4.1 Focus on technological innovation, robust digital infrastructure, and supportive regulatory environment to foster market growth
- 10.3.5 ITALY
- 10.3.5.1 Increasing adoption of semantic technologies and government commitment to fostering innovation to drive market
- 10.3.6 SPAIN
- 10.3.6.1 Strategic initiatives in AI development sector and implementation of Spain's 2024 Artificial Intelligence Strategy to accelerate market
- 10.3.7 NORDIC COUNTRIES
- 10.3.7.1 High digital literacy, advanced AI readiness, and robust public-private partnerships to bolster market growth
- 10.3.8 REST OF EUROPE
- 10.4 ASIA PACIFIC
- 10.4.1 ASIA PACIFIC: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
- 10.4.2 CHINA
- 10.4.2.1 Rapid technological advancements, government initiatives, and strategic focus on integrating AI to boost market
- 10.4.3 JAPAN
- 10.4.3.1 Advancements in robotics and a strong focus on AI technologies under the government's "Society 5.0" initiative to drive market
- 10.4.4 INDIA
- 10.4.4.1 Focus on promoting advanced technology usage through government initiatives to foster market growth
- 10.4.5 SOUTH KOREA
- 10.4.5.1 Strong focus on developing and enhancing public-private partnerships to drive market
- 10.4.6 AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND
- 10.4.6.1 Strategic collaborations for development in new age technologies to drive market
- 10.4.7 REST OF ASIA PACIFIC
- 10.5 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
- 10.5.1 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
- 10.5.2 GCC COUNTRIES
- 10.5.2.1 Increasing investment in AI technologies for development to fuel market growth
- 10.5.2.2 UAE
- 10.5.2.2.1 Rising government support for AI and digital transformation initiatives to foster market growth
- 10.5.2.3 KSA
- 10.5.2.3.1 Government initiatives and investments in digital infrastructure to propel market
- 10.5.2.4 Rest of GCC countries
- 10.5.3 SOUTH AFRICA
- 10.5.3.1 Growing focus on digital transformation and innovation to accelerate market growth
- 10.5.4 REST OF MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 244
- 10.6 LATIN AMERICA
- 10.6.1 LATIN AMERICA: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
- 10.6.2 BRAZIL
- 10.6.2.1 Increasing demand for personalized customer interactions and advancements in AI technologies to propel market
- 10.6.3 MEXICO
- 10.6.3.1 Focus on advancing digital infrastructure to boost market growth
- 10.6.4 ARGENTINA
- 10.6.4.1 Focus on digital transformation initiatives to drive market
- 10.6.5 REST OF LATIN AMERICA
11 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
- 11.1 INTRODUCTION
- 11.2 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN
- 11.3 REVENUE ANALYSIS
- 11.4 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
- 11.5 MARKET RANKING ANALYSIS
- 11.6 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2023
- 11.6.1 STARS
- 11.6.2 EMERGING LEADERS
- 11.6.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS
- 11.6.4 PARTICIPANTS
- 11.6.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS, 2024
- 11.6.5.1 Company footprint
- 11.6.5.2 Vertical footprint
- 11.6.5.3 Offering footprint
- 11.6.5.4 Regional footprint
- 11.7 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: START-UPS/SMES, 2024
- 11.7.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
- 11.7.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
- 11.7.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES
- 11.7.4 STARTING BLOCKS
- 11.7.5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: START-UPS/SMES, 2024
- 11.7.5.1 Key start-ups/SMEs
- 11.7.5.2 Competitive benchmarking of key start-ups/SMEs
- 11.8 COMPETITIVE SCENARIOS AND TRENDS
- 11.8.1 PRODUCT LAUNCHES & ENHANCEMENTS
- 11.8.2 DEALS
- 11.9 BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARISON
- 11.10 COMPANY VALUATION AND FINANCIAL METRICS OF KEY KNOWLEDGE GRAPH SOLUTION PROVIDERS 275
12 COMPANY PROFILES
- 12.1 KEY PLAYERS
- 12.1.1 NEO4J
- 12.1.1.1 Business overview
- 12.1.1.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.1.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.1.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.1.3.2 Deals
- 12.1.1.4 MnM view
- 12.1.1.4.1 Right to win
- 12.1.1.4.2 Strategic choices
- 12.1.1.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
- 12.1.2 AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC
- 12.1.2.1 Business overview
- 12.1.2.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.2.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.2.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.2.4 MnM view
- 12.1.2.4.1 Right to win
- 12.1.2.4.2 Strategic choices
- 12.1.2.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
- 12.1.3 TIGERGRAPH
- 12.1.3.1 Business overview
- 12.1.3.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.3.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.3.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.3.3.2 Deals
- 12.1.3.4 MnM view
- 12.1.3.4.1 Right to win
- 12.1.3.4.2 Strategic choices
- 12.1.3.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
- 12.1.4 GRAPHWISE
- 12.1.4.1 Business overview
- 12.1.4.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.4.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.4.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.4.4 MnM view
- 12.1.4.4.1 Right to win
- 12.1.4.4.2 Strategic choices
- 12.1.4.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats 287
- 12.1.5 RELATIONALAI
- 12.1.5.1 Business overview
- 12.1.5.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.5.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.5.3.1 Product launches
- 12.1.5.4 MnM view
- 12.1.5.4.1 Right to win
- 12.1.5.4.2 Strategic choices
- 12.1.5.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
- 12.1.6 IBM
- 12.1.6.1 Business overview
- 12.1.6.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.6.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.6.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.6.3.2 Deals
- 12.1.7 MICROSOFT
- 12.1.7.1 Business overview
- 12.1.7.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.7.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.7.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.7.3.2 Deals
- 12.1.8 SAP
- 12.1.8.1 Business overview
- 12.1.8.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.8.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.8.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.9 ORACLE
- 12.1.9.1 Business overview
- 12.1.9.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.9.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.9.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.10 STARDOG
- 12.1.10.1 Business overview
- 12.1.10.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.10.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.10.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.10.3.2 Deals 305
- 12.1.11 ONTOTEXT
- 12.1.11.1 Business overview
- 12.1.11.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.11.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.11.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.11.3.2 Deals
- 12.1.12 FRANZ INC.
- 12.1.12.1 Business overview
- 12.1.12.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.12.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.12.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.13 ALTAIR
- 12.1.13.1 Business overview
- 12.1.13.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 12.1.13.3 Recent developments
- 12.1.13.3.1 Product enhancements
- 12.1.13.3.2 Deals
- 12.1.14 PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
- 12.1.15 ESRI
- 12.1.16 SEMANTIC WEB COMPANY
- 12.1.17 OPENLINK SOFTWARE
- 12.2 SMES/START-UPS
- 12.2.1 DATAVID
- 12.2.2 GRAPHBASE
- 12.2.3 CONVERSIGHT
- 12.2.4 ECCENCA
- 12.2.5 ARANGODB
- 12.2.6 FLUREE
- 12.2.7 DIFFBOT
- 12.2.8 BITNINE
- 12.2.9 MEMGRAPH
- 12.2.10 GRAPHAWARE
- 12.2.11 ONLIM
- 12.2.12 SMABBLER
- 12.2.13 WISECUBE
- 12.2.14 METAPHACTS
13 ADJACENT/RELATED MARKETS
- 13.1 INTRODUCTION
- 13.2 GRAPH DATABASE MARKET - GLOBAL FORECAST TO 2030
- 13.2.1 MARKET DEFINITION
- 13.2.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
- 13.2.2.1 Graph database market, by offering
- 13.2.2.2 Graph database market, by model type
- 13.2.2.3 Graph database market, by application
- 13.2.2.4 Graph database market, by vertical
- 13.2.2.5 Graph database market, by region
- 13.3 ENTERPRISE CONTENT MANAGEMENT MARKET - GLOBAL FORECAST TO 2029
- 13.3.1 MARKET DEFINITION
- 13.3.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
- 13.3.2.1 Enterprise content management market, by offering
- 13.3.2.2 Enterprise content management market, by business function
- 13.3.2.3 Enterprise content management market, by deployment mode
- 13.3.2.4 Enterprise content management market, by organization size
- 13.3.2.5 Enterprise content management market, by vertical
- 13.3.2.6 Enterprise content management market, by region
- 13.4 GENERATIVE AI MARKET - GLOBAL FORECAST TO 2030
- 13.4.1 MARKET DEFINITION
- 13.4.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
- 13.4.2.1 Generative AI market, by offering
- 13.4.2.2 Generative AI market, by data modality
- 13.4.2.3 Generative AI market, by application
- 13.4.2.4 Generative AI market, by end user
- 13.4.2.5 Generative AI market, by region
14 APPENDIX
- 14.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE
- 14.2 KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS' SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
- 14.3 CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS
- 14.4 RELATED REPORTS
- 14.5 AUTHOR DETAILS