查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1489387

全球結構安全監控市場預測（-2030）：按組件、類型、實施方法、應用、最終用戶和區域進行全球分析

Structural Health Monitoring Market Forecasts to 2030 - Global Analysis By Component (Hardware, Software and Other Components), Type (Wired Systems and Wireless Systems), Implementation Method, Application, End User and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

根據 Stratistics MRC 的數據，2023 年全球結構安全監控市場規模為 31.4 億美元，預計到 2030 年將達到 117.9 億美元，預測期內複合年成長率為 20.8%。結構安全監控(SHM) 是一種即時或定期評估橋樑、建築物、管道等基礎設施狀況的主動方法。它使用感測器、資料分析技術和預測演算法來檢測結構中的損壞、劣化和異常。持續監控應變、振動和溫度等關鍵參數有助於在潛在問題變得嚴重之前識別它們，從而提高安全性、降低維護成本並延長資產的使用壽命。 SHM 系統可以有線或無線方式使用，提供結構性能的寶貴見解，並支援維護和維修的明智決策。其應用範圍從土木工程到航太，提供全面的解決方案以確保關鍵基礎設施的完整性和可靠性。

根據美國聯邦公路管理局 (FHWA) 的數據，美國超過 30.0% 的建築物（包括橋樑和水壩）的基礎設施設計壽命超過了 50 年。

資產管理的必要性

資產管理在最佳化基礎設施資產的性能和壽命方面發揮關鍵作用，因此是結構安全監控市場的關鍵驅動力。透過實施 SHM 解決方案，資產管理者可以主動即時監控橋樑、建築物和水壩等結構的健康狀況和完整性。這種主動方法可以讓您及時發現結構問題，最大限度地降低維護成本並提高安全性。此外，SHM 有助於資料驅動的決策，使資產管理者能夠確定維修的優先順序並有效地分配資源。總體而言，透過將 SHM 納入您的資產管理策略，組織可以確保其基礎設施資產的可靠性和彈性。

複雜

複雜性是指在不同的結構環境中實施監測系統的複雜性所帶來的挑戰。這包括不同的結構設計、材料成分和操作條件等因素。管理這種複雜性需要強大的感測器技術、先進的資料分析和自適應監控策略。此外，與現有基礎設施的整合以及與不同架構風格的兼容性增加了複雜性。克服這種複雜性需要創新方法、多學科協作以及健康監測技術的持續進步，以確保準確可靠的結構評估。

航太和國防領域的新興應用

SHM技術可以即時監控結構的完整性，這對於確保航太和國防業務的安全和效率至關重要。在這些領域，即使是最小的結構缺陷也可能產生災難性後果，SHM 提供預防性維護，減少停機時間和維護成本。此外，隨著航太結構變得更加複雜以及對自主系統的需求增加，SHM 在確保連續運作和任務成功方面發揮著至關重要的作用。這為針對航太和國防應用的特定要求量身定做的先進 SHM 解決方案留下了成熟的市場，從而推動了該領域的創新和投資。

初始成本高

高初始成本的威脅是實施 SHM 系統所需的大量前期投資。這些成本包括購買感測器、資料採集系統、軟體、安裝和持續維護。對於潛在客戶，尤其是民用基礎設施和航太等領域的潛在客戶來說，這些成本可能會成為採用的障礙，並阻止他們投資 SHM 解決方案，儘管有長期好處。為了應對這項威脅，SHM 供應商必須強調其系統的成本效益和長期節省，提供彈性價格設定模型，並持續創新以降低潛在客戶的進入成本。

COVID-19 的影響：

COVID-19 的疫情對結構安全監控市場產生了重大影響。最初，由於供應鏈中斷和施工取消導致計劃停滯，對 SHM 系統的需求下降。然而，隨著產業適應遠端監控解決方案，人們越來越認知到健康管理在確保基礎設施安全方面的重要性。此舉正值當局尋求防止未來的干擾並確保關鍵基礎設施的復原能力之際。

軟體部分預計將在預測期內成為最大的部分

由於多種因素，結構安全監控市場的軟體部分正在顯著成長。感測器技術的進步增加了資料收集，需要先進的軟體解決方案進行處理和分析。此外，人工智慧和機器學習演算法的整合增強了 SHM 軟體更準確地檢測和預測結構問題的能力。此外，隨著基礎設施老化和安全法規變得更加嚴格，健康管理軟體的採用預計只會增加。

橋樑和水壩領域預計在預測期內複合年成長率最高

結構安全監控市場的橋樑和水壩部分的成長主要是由於對世界基礎設施老化的日益擔憂所推動的。政府和組織大力投資監測系統，以確保橋樑和水壩的安全和完整性。光纖和無線系統等先進感測器技術正在部署，以提供有關橋樑和大壩結構健康狀況的即時資料，從而製定主動維護和風險緩解策略。此外，嚴格的安全法規以及最大限度地減少與結構故障相關的停機時間和維修成本的需求也加速了 SHM 解決方案的採用。

佔比最大的地區：

由於橋樑、水壩和建築物等基礎設施計劃投資的增加，北美結構健康監測市場出現了顯著成長，導致對 SHM 系統的需求增加，以確保安全和壽命。有關結構安全的嚴格法規和標準正在推動 SHM 技術在各個行業的採用。此外，感測器技術、資料分析和無線通訊的進步使 SHM 系統更加高效且更具成本效益，從而推動了市場擴張。此外，人們對預測性維護和即時監控優勢的認知不斷提高，也推動了對 SHM 解決方案的投資。

複合年成長率最高的地區：

由於中國、印度和東南亞國家等國家的快速都市化和基礎設施發展，亞太地區正在經歷顯著成長，增加了對SHM 系統的需求，以確保建築物、橋樑和其他關鍵基礎設施的安全和完整性。此外，該地區容易遭受地震等自然災害，對先進監控解決方案的需求不斷增加，而政府致力於加強基礎設施彈性和安全標準的舉措正在推動市場成長。先進技術的出現和無線感測器網路的日益普及也有助於亞太地區 SHM 市場的擴張。

免費客製化服務

如果您訂閱此報告，我們將為您提供以下免費自訂選項之一：

  • 公司簡介
    • 其他市場參與企業的綜合分析（最多 3 家公司）
    • 主要企業SWOT分析（最多3家企業）
  • 區域分割
    • 根據客戶興趣對主要國家的市場估計/預測/複合年成長率（註：基於可行性檢查）
  • 競爭基準化分析
    • 按產品系列、地理分佈和策略聯盟對主要企業基準化分析

目錄

第1章執行摘要

第2章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相關利益者
  • 調查範圍
  • 調查方法
    • 資料探勘
    • 資料分析
    • 資料檢驗
    • 研究途徑
  • 研究資訊來源
    • 主要研究資訊來源
    • 二次研究資訊來源
    • 先決條件

第3章市場趨勢分析

  • 介紹
  • 促進因素
  • 抑制因素
  • 機會
  • 威脅
  • 應用分析
  • 最終用戶分析
  • 新興市場
  • COVID-19 的影響

第4章波特五力分析

  • 供應商的議價能力
  • 買方議價能力
  • 替代品的威脅
  • 新進入者的威脅
  • 競爭公司之間的敵對關係

第5章全球結構安全監控市場：按組成部分

  • 介紹
  • 硬體
    • 資料採集系統
    • 感應器
    • 其他
  • 軟體
    • 參數識別與追蹤
    • 設計與分析
    • 其他軟體
  • 服務
    • 設計和諮詢服務
    • 安裝服務
    • 維運服務
    • 其他
  • 其他

第6章全球結構安全監控市場：依類型

  • 介紹
  • 有線系統
  • 無線系統

第7章全球結構安全監控市場：依實施方法分類

  • 介紹
  • 修改
  • 新建築

第8章全球結構安全監控市場：依應用分類

  • 介紹
  • 飛機和風力發電機
  • 橋樑/水壩
  • 建築物和體育場館
  • 大型機械/設備
  • 船舶和平台
  • 其他

第9章全球結構安全監控市場：依最終使用者分類

  • 介紹
  • 礦業
  • 航太和國防
  • 土木工程基礎設施
  • 其他

第10章全球結構安全監控市場：按地區

  • 介紹
  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 歐洲其他地區
  • 亞太地區
    • 日本
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 紐西蘭
    • 韓國
    • 其他亞太地區
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地區
  • 中東/非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 卡達
    • 南非
    • 其他中東/非洲

第11章 主要進展

  • 合約、夥伴關係、協作和合資企業
  • 收購和合併
  • 新產品發布
  • 業務擴展
  • 其他關鍵策略

第12章 公司概況

  • Campbell Scientific, Inc.
  • Cowi A/S
  • Digi-Texx
  • Geocomp, Inc.
  • Geokon
  • GeoSIG Ltd
  • James Fisher and Sons plc.
  • Kinemetrics
  • National Instruments Corp
  • Nova Ventures Group
  • Sixense
  • Structural Monitoring Systems Plc
  • Xylem
Product Code: SMRC26173

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Structural Health Monitoring Market is accounted for $3.14 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach $11.79 billion by 2030 growing at a CAGR of 20.8% during the forecast period. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is a proactive approach to assessing the condition of infrastructure such as bridges, buildings, and pipelines in real-time or periodically. It involves the use of sensors, data analysis techniques, and predictive algorithms to detect damage, degradation, or abnormalities in structures. By continuously monitoring key parameters like strain, vibration, and temperature, SHM aims to identify potential issues before they escalate, thereby enhancing safety, reducing maintenance costs, and extending the lifespan of assets. SHM systems can be wired or wireless, and they provide valuable insights into structural performance, aiding in informed decision-making for maintenance and repairs. Its applications range from civil engineering to aerospace, offering a comprehensive solution for ensuring the integrity and reliability of critical infrastructure.

According to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in the U.S., more than 30.0% of structures, including bridges and dams, have surpassed their 50 years of infrastructure design life.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Need for asset management

Asset management is a key driver of the structural health monitoring market due to its crucial role in optimizing the performance and longevity of infrastructure assets. By implementing SHM solutions, asset managers can proactively monitor the health and integrity of structures such as bridges, buildings, and dams in real-time. This proactive approach enables timely detection of structural issues, minimizes maintenance costs, and enhances safety. Additionally, SHM facilitates data-driven decision-making, enabling asset managers to prioritize repairs and allocate resources efficiently. Overall, integrating SHM into asset management strategies helps organizations ensure the reliability and resilience of their infrastructure assets.

Restraint:

Complexity

The complexity restraint refers to challenges arising from the intricate nature of implementing monitoring systems in diverse structural environments. This encompasses factors such as varying structural designs, material compositions, and operational conditions. Managing this complexity requires robust sensor technologies, sophisticated data analytics, and adaptable monitoring strategies. Additionally, integration with existing infrastructure and compatibility with different architectural styles add layers of intricacy. Overcoming these complexities demands innovative approaches, interdisciplinary collaboration, and continuous advancements in SHM technology to ensure accurate and reliable structural assessments.

Opportunity:

Emerging applications in aerospace and defense

SHM technology offers real-time monitoring of structural integrity, which is crucial for ensuring safety and efficiency in aerospace and defense operations. In these sectors, where even minor structural defects can have catastrophic consequences, SHM provides proactive maintenance, reducing downtime and maintenance costs. Moreover, with the growing complexity of aerospace structures and the increasing demand for autonomous systems, SHM plays a pivotal role in ensuring continuous operation and mission success. This presents a ripe market for advanced SHM solutions tailored to the unique requirements of aerospace and defense applications, fostering innovation and investment in the sector.

Threat:

High initial costs

The high initial cost threats are the significant upfront investment required to implement SHM systems. These costs encompass purchasing sensors, data acquisition systems, software, installation, and ongoing maintenance. For potential clients, especially in sectors like civil infrastructure or aerospace, these expenses can act as a barrier to adoption, deterring them from investing in SHM solutions despite their long-term benefits. Addressing this threat requires SHM providers to emphasize the cost-effectiveness and long-term savings of their systems, offer flexible pricing models, and continually innovate to lower the entry costs for prospective clients.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the structural health monitoring market. Initially, there was a slowdown in projects due to supply chain disruptions and construction halts, leading to a dip in demand for SHM systems. However, as industries adapted to remote monitoring solutions, there emerged a heightened awareness of the importance of SHM in ensuring infrastructure safety. This awareness has driven investments in SHM technologies, particularly in sectors like transportation, energy, and civil engineering, as authorities seek to prevent future disruptions and ensure the resilience of critical infrastructure.

The software segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The software segment within the structural health monitoring market has seen significant growth due to several factors. Advancements in sensor technology have led to an increase in data collection, necessitating sophisticated software solutions for processing and analysis. Additionally, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms has enhanced the capabilities of SHM software in detecting and predicting structural issues with greater accuracy. Furthermore, as infrastructure ages and safety regulations become more stringent, the adoption of SHM software is expected to continue its upward trajectory.

The bridges and dams segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

The growth in the Bridges and Dams segment of the Structural Health Monitoring market is primarily driven by increasing concerns about the aging infrastructure worldwide. Governments and organizations are investing significantly in monitoring systems to ensure the safety and integrity of bridges and dams. Advanced sensor technologies, such as fiber optics and wireless systems, are being deployed to provide real-time data on the structural health of bridges and dams, leading to proactive maintenance and risk mitigation strategies. Additionally, the adoption of SHM solutions is being accelerated by stringent safety regulations and the need to minimize downtime and repair costs associated with structural failures.

Region with largest share:

The structural health monitoring market in North America has experienced significant growth due to increasing investments in infrastructure projects, such as bridges, dams, and buildings, which has driven the demand for SHM systems to ensure safety and longevity. Stringent regulations and standards regarding structural safety have propelled the adoption of SHM technologies across various industries. Additionally, advancements in sensor technology, data analytics, and wireless communication have made SHM systems more efficient and cost-effective, further fueling market expansion. Moreover, growing awareness about the benefits of predictive maintenance and real-time monitoring has encouraged organizations to invest in SHM solutions.

Region with highest CAGR:

The Asia-Pacific region has witnessed significant growth due to rapid urbanization and infrastructural development across countries like China, India, and Southeast Asian nations which led to increased demand for SHM systems to ensure the safety and integrity of buildings, bridges, and other critical infrastructure. Moreover, the region's susceptibility to natural disasters like earthquakes has heightened the need for advanced monitoring solutions, government initiatives focusing on enhancing infrastructure resilience and safety standards have further propelled market growth. The emergence of advanced technologies and the growing adoption of wireless sensor networks have also contributed to the expansion of the SHM market in the Asia Pacific.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Structural Health Monitoring market include Campbell Scientific, Inc., Cowi A/S, Digi-Texx, Geocomp, Inc., Geokon, GeoSIG Ltd, James Fisher and Sons plc., Kinemetrics, National Instruments Corp., Nova Ventures Group, Sixense, Structural Monitoring Systems Plc and Xylem.

Key Developments:

In April 2024, Xylem introduces new mobile technology that will help water utilities meet compliance requirements for emerging drinking water contaminants such as PFAS. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) passed new regulations for Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for PFAS related contaminants in drinking water on April 10, 2024. Meeting new requirements can often lead to the implementation of new equipment. Xylem and Evoqua, now one company, have developed the MitiGATOR Mobile System that aims at filtering out new contaminants such as PFAS.

Components Covered:

  • Hardware
  • Software
  • Service
  • Other Components

Types Covered:

  • Wired Systems
  • Wireless Systems

Implementation Methods Covered:

  • Retrofitting
  • New Construction

Applications Covered:

  • Airframes and Wind Turbines
  • Bridges and Dams
  • Building and Stadiums
  • Large Machines and Equipment
  • Vessels and Platforms
  • Other Applications

End Users Covered:

  • Mining
  • Aerospace and Defense
  • Civil Infrastructure
  • Other End Users

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2021, 2022, 2023, 2026, and 2030
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Application Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Component

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Hardware
    • 5.2.1 Data Acquisition Systems
    • 5.2.2 Sensors
    • 5.2.3 Other Hardwares
  • 5.3 Software
    • 5.3.1 Parameter Identification and Tracking
    • 5.3.2 Design and Analysis
    • 5.3.3 Other Softwares
  • 5.4 Service
    • 5.4.1 Design and Consulting Service
    • 5.4.2 Installation Service
    • 5.4.3 Operation and Maintenance Service
    • 5.4.4 Other Services
  • 5.5 Other Components

6 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Wired Systems
  • 6.3 Wireless Systems

7 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Implementation Method

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Retrofitting
  • 7.3 New Construction

8 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Application

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Airframes and Wind Turbines
  • 8.3 Bridges and Dams
  • 8.4 Building and Stadiums
  • 8.5 Large Machines and Equipment
  • 8.6 Vessels and Platforms
  • 8.7 Other Applications

9 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By End User

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Mining
  • 9.3 Aerospace and Defense
  • 9.4 Civil Infrastructure
  • 9.5 Other End Users

10 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Geography

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 North America
    • 10.2.1 US
    • 10.2.2 Canada
    • 10.2.3 Mexico
  • 10.3 Europe
    • 10.3.1 Germany
    • 10.3.2 UK
    • 10.3.3 Italy
    • 10.3.4 France
    • 10.3.5 Spain
    • 10.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 10.4 Asia Pacific
    • 10.4.1 Japan
    • 10.4.2 China
    • 10.4.3 India
    • 10.4.4 Australia
    • 10.4.5 New Zealand
    • 10.4.6 South Korea
    • 10.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 10.5 South America
    • 10.5.1 Argentina
    • 10.5.2 Brazil
    • 10.5.3 Chile
    • 10.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 10.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 10.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 10.6.2 UAE
    • 10.6.3 Qatar
    • 10.6.4 South Africa
    • 10.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

11 Key Developments

  • 11.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 11.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 11.3 New Product Launch
  • 11.4 Expansions
  • 11.5 Other Key Strategies

12 Company Profiling

  • 12.1 Campbell Scientific, Inc.
  • 12.2 Cowi A/S
  • 12.3 Digi-Texx
  • 12.4 Geocomp, Inc.
  • 12.5 Geokon
  • 12.6 GeoSIG Ltd
  • 12.7 James Fisher and Sons plc.
  • 12.8 Kinemetrics
  • 12.9 National Instruments Corp
  • 12.10 Nova Ventures Group
  • 12.11 Sixense
  • 12.12 Structural Monitoring Systems Plc
  • 12.13 Xylem

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Region (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Component (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Hardware (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Data Acquisition Systems (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Sensors (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Hardwares (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Software (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Parameter Identification and Tracking (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Design and Analysis (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Softwares (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Design and Consulting Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Installation Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Operation and Maintenance Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Services (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Components (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Type (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Wired Systems (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Wireless Systems (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Implementation Method (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Retrofitting (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By New Construction (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Application (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Airframes and Wind Turbines (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Bridges and Dams (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Building and Stadiums (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Large Machines and Equipment (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Vessels and Platforms (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Applications (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 30 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By End User (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 31 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Energy (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 32 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Mining (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 33 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Aerospace and Defense (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 34 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Civil Infrastructure (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 35 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2021-2030) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.