封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1485073

農業生物製品測試市場 - 全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會和預測,按類型、產品、最終用戶、地區和競爭細分,2019-2029F

Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Type, By Product, By End User, By Region and Competition, 2019-2029F

出版日期: | 出版商: TechSci Research | 英文 186 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

We offer 8 hour analyst time for an additional research. Please contact us for the details.

簡介目錄

2023年全球農業生物製品測試市值為27.8億美元,預計2029年將在預測期內實現穩定成長,複合年成長率為7.69%。 、真菌、線蟲、和植物萃取物,可用於控制農作物的病蟲害。它們提供了合成農藥的天然且環保的替代品,減少了對有害化學物質的依賴並促進農業生態系統的生物多樣性。與具有明確化學性質的合成農藥不同,生物農藥是具有固有變異性的生命實體。它們的有效性可能受到多種因素的影響,例如菌株、環境條件以及與其他生物的相互作用。高通量測序和生物感測器等發展正在提供更快、更準確且更具成本效益的測試方法。超越受控環境進行現場試驗可以更真實地了解生物製劑的性能。研究人員、測試實驗室和產業參與者之間加強合作可以加速標準化協議和最佳實踐的開發。可靠且有效的生物製劑可以鼓勵農民轉向永續的做法。生物製品可以促進土壤健康、生物多樣性和整體生態系統平衡。

市場概況
預測期 2025-2029
2023 年市場規模 27.8億美元
2029 年市場規模 43.2億美元
2024-2029 年複合年成長率 7.69%
成長最快的細分市場 生物肥料
最大的市場 北美洲

由於擔心合成農藥和化學肥料對環境和健康的影響,消費者擴大尋求以永續和有機方法生產的食品。這種偏好的轉變正在增加對生物肥料、生物農藥和生物促效劑的需求,從而需要進行全面的測試以確保其安全性和有效性。由於合成農藥對人類健康和環境有潛在的有害影響,世界各地的監管機構正在對合成農藥的使用實施更嚴格的規定。這為採用生物替代品創造了有利的環境,生物替代品通常被認為更安全、更環保。因此,對這些替代品的測試服務的需求正在增加。新的、更有效率的測試技術使評估生物製品的功效和安全性變得更加容易和快捷,從而簡化了產品開發流程。這進一步鼓勵了這些環保替代品的開發和採用。

主要市場促進因素

加強公眾對農業實踐的監督

對永續和有機農業的需求不斷成長

農業生物檢測方法的技術進步

主要市場挑戰

缺乏標準化測試協議

測試成本高

主要市場趨勢

生物製品多元化

專注於現場測試

細分市場洞察

類型洞察

最終使用者見解

區域洞察

目錄

第 1 章:產品概述

第 2 章:研究方法

第 3 章:執行摘要

第 4 章:客戶之聲

第 5 章:全球農業生物製品測試市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型(生物農藥、生物肥料和生物促效劑)
    • 按產品(現場支援、分析和監管)
    • 按最終用戶(生物製品製造商、政府機構和其他)
    • 按地區
    • 按公司分類 (2023)
  • 市場地圖

第 6 章:北美農業生物製品測試市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型
    • 按產品分類
    • 按最終用戶
    • 按國家/地區
  • 北美:國家分析
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥

第 7 章:歐洲農業生物製品測試市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型
    • 按產品分類
    • 按最終用戶
    • 按國家/地區
  • 歐洲:國家分析
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 義大利
    • 法國
    • 西班牙

第 8 章:亞太地區農業生物製品測試市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型
    • 按產品分類
    • 按最終用戶
    • 按國家/地區
  • 亞太地區:國家分析
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 韓國
    • 澳洲

第 9 章:南美洲農業生物製品測試市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型
    • 按產品分類
    • 按最終用戶
    • 按國家/地區
  • 南美洲:國家分析
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 哥倫比亞

第 10 章:中東和非洲農業生物製品測試市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型
    • 按產品分類
    • 按最終用戶
    • 按國家/地區
  • MEA:國家分析
    • 南非
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國

第 11 章:市場動態

  • 促進要素
  • 挑戰

第 12 章:市場趨勢與發展

  • 併購(如有)
  • 產品發布(如有)
  • 最近的發展

第 13 章:波特五力分析

  • 產業競爭
  • 新進入者的潛力
  • 供應商的力量
  • 客戶的力量
  • 替代產品的威脅

第14章:競爭格局

  • Eurofins Scientific SE
  • Biotecnologie BT Srl.
  • SynTech Research Inc.
  • RJ Hill Laboratories Limited
  • LAUS GmbH
  • Intertek Group plc
  • Bureau Veritas SA
  • ALS Limited
  • TUV NORD AG

第 15 章:策略建議

第16章調查會社について,免責事項

簡介目錄
Product Code: 23374

Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market was valued at USD 2.78 Billion in 2023 and is expected to achieve a steady growth in the forecast period at a CAGR of 7.69% through 2029. Agricultural Biologicals are living organisms or their derivatives, like bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and plant extracts, that can be used to control pests and diseases in crops. They offer a natural and eco-friendly alternative to synthetic pesticides, reducing reliance on harmful chemicals and promoting biodiversity in the agricultural ecosystem. Unlike synthetic pesticides with well-defined chemical properties, biologicals are living entities with inherent variability. Their effectiveness can be influenced by various factors like strain, environmental conditions, and interactions with other organisms. Developments like high-throughput sequencing and biosensors are providing faster, more accurate, and cost-effective testing methods. Moving beyond controlled environments to field trials provides a more realistic picture of the biological agent's performance. Increased collaboration between researchers, testing labs, and industry players can accelerate the development of standardized protocols and best practices. Reliable and effective biological agents can encourage farmers to transition towards sustainable practices. Biologicals can promote soil health, biodiversity, and overall ecosystem balance.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2025-2029
Market Size 2023USD 2.78 Billion
Market Size 2029USD 4.32 Billion
CAGR 2024-20297.69%
Fastest Growing SegmentBiofertilizers
Largest MarketNorth America

Consumers are increasingly seeking food produced using sustainable and organic practices, driven by concerns about the environmental and health impacts of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers. This shift in preference is boosting the demand for biofertilizers, biopesticides, and biostimulants, leading to a need for comprehensive testing to ensure their safety and efficacy. Regulatory bodies worldwide are implementing stricter regulations on the use of synthetic pesticides due to their potential harmful effects on human health and the environment. This creates a favorable environment for the adoption of biological alternatives, which are generally considered safer and more environmentally friendly. Consequently, the demand for testing services for these alternatives is increasing. New and more efficient testing technologies are making it easier and faster to assess the efficacy and safety of biological products, streamlining the product development process. This further encourages the development and adoption of these environmentally friendly alternatives.

Key Market Drivers

Increased Public Scrutiny of Agricultural Practices

Consumers are becoming increasingly informed and concerned about the environmental and ethical implications of conventional agriculture. Concerns about the potential health risks associated with residues of synthetic pesticides on food are driving consumers to seek out alternatives like organic produce or food grown using biopesticides. The impact of conventional agriculture on soil health, water quality, and biodiversity is under growing scrutiny. This is leading to a preference for practices that are more sustainable and less damaging to the environment, such as the use of biofertilizers and biostimulants. Concerns about the welfare of animals raised in factory farms are prompting consumers to seek out meat and dairy products produced using more humane practices. This can open doors for the use of biological pest control methods in animal agriculture. Increased media coverage and activism around these issues raise public awareness and put pressure on policymakers and the agricultural industry to adopt more sustainable practices.

Regulatory bodies are tightening regulations on the use of synthetic pesticides and promoting the adoption of more sustainable alternatives. This, in turn, creates a favorable environment for the use of biologicals and drives the need for rigorous testing to ensure their compliance with regulations. Retailers and food companies are responding to consumer demand by offering more organic and sustainable food options. This creates market incentives for farmers to adopt practices that utilize biologicals, further increasing the demand for testing services. Consumers are increasingly demanding transparency and traceability in food supply chains. This means they want to know how their food was grown and raised, and whether it was produced using sustainable and ethical practices. The use of biologicals can be a part of this transparency movement, as testing can verify the use of these alternatives and build consumer trust. In an era of heightened public scrutiny, the agricultural industry needs to rebuild trust with consumers. Demonstrating a commitment to using safe and sustainable practices, including the use of tested and certified biologicals, can be a key step in regaining public confidence. This factor will help in the development of the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market.

Rising Demand for Sustainable and Organic Agriculture

The quest for a more sustainable and organic approach to agriculture is rapidly transforming the market landscape. As consumers become increasingly concerned about the environmental and health impacts of conventional farming practices, the demand for agricultural biologicals is skyrocketing. This, in turn, is fueling the need for comprehensive and rigorous agricultural biologicals testing. The use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers has been linked to soil degradation, water pollution, and biodiversity loss. Consumers are increasingly seeking alternatives that minimize these harmful effects. Residues of synthetic pesticides can linger on fruits and vegetables, raising concerns about potential health risks for consumers. Organic farming and the use of biopesticides offer a safer alternative. Many consumers believe that food grown using sustainable and organic methods is more nutritious and flavorful.

Biofertilizers are naturally occurring microorganisms that improve soil health and fertility, reducing the need for synthetic fertilizers. Biopesticides are naturally derived pest control agents that offer a safer and more environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic pesticides. Biostimulants are plant-derived substances that enhance plant growth and resilience, helping them resist diseases and pests. Testing assesses potential risks associated with the use of biologicals, ensuring they don't harm consumers or ecosystems. Testing confirms that the biologicals effectively control pests, improve soil health, or enhance plant growth as intended. Governments often have strict regulations governing the use of agricultural biologicals, and testing is necessary for compliance. Consumers are increasingly demanding transparency and traceability in food production. Rigorous testing provides evidence of the quality and effectiveness of biologicals, fostering trust in sustainable and organic agriculture.

The market for agricultural biologicals testing is experiencing significant growth, driven by the rising demand for sustainable and organic agriculture. This trend is expected to continue in the coming years, as consumers become even more conscious of the choices they make and the impact they have on the environment and their health. This presents a promising opportunity for companies involved in developing and providing testing services for agricultural biologicals. By investing in innovative technologies and ensuring accurate and reliable testing, these companies can contribute to a more sustainable and healthy food system for all. The rise of sustainable and organic agriculture, along with the increasing demand for agricultural biologicals testing, marks a significant shift in the way we approach food production. As we move towards a future that prioritizes environmental protection and human health, biologicals have the potential to play a crucial role in creating a more sustainable and responsible food system. This factor will pace up the demand of the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market.

Technological Advancements in Agricultural Biologicals Testing Methods

The world of agricultural biologicals testing is undergoing a revolution, fueled by rapid advancements in technology. These innovations are not only streamlining the testing process but also enhancing its accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Traditionally, identifying microorganisms in biologicals relied on slow and laborious culture-based methods. HTS has disrupted this landscape by rapidly sequencing the DNA of all present microbes, providing a comprehensive picture of the microbial community in a single test. Biosensors and Bioassays are innovative techniques that are replacing time-consuming and resource-intensive traditional bioassays for assessing the efficacy of biologicals. Biosensors utilize specific biological interactions to detect and quantify target molecules, while bioassays employ living organisms to measure the biological activity of a substance. High-resolution imaging technologies, such as confocal microscopy and micro-computed tomography, are providing unparalleled insights into the interactions between biologicals and plants or pests.

AI and ML algorithms are rapidly transforming data analysis in agricultural biologicals testing. Robotic systems are increasingly automating repetitive tasks in biologicals testing, such as sample preparation, handling, and analysis. These technological advancements hold immense promise for the future of agricultural biologicals testing. By embracing these innovations, we can create a faster, more accurate, and sustainable testing system that supports the development and adoption of safe and effective biological solutions for a healthier and more productive agricultural future. The integration of these cutting-edge technologies into agricultural biologicals testing is paving the way for several positive outcomes, Reduced reliance on synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, fostering a more sustainable agricultural system. Development of more targeted and effective biological control agents, leading to improved pest and disease management. This factor will accelerate the demand of the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market.

Key Market Challenges

Lack of Standardized Testing Protocols

The rapid expansion of the Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market comes with its own set of challenges, and the lack of standardized testing protocols stands out as a particularly significant roadblock. This issue holds back the widespread adoption of biological control agents and hinders a truly sustainable approach to agriculture. Unlike their synthetic counterparts, biological control agents (BCAs) are living organisms. This inherent variability, influenced by factors like strain, storage conditions, and environmental parameters, makes it difficult to assess their efficacy and safety consistently. Currently, different countries and even laboratories employ diverse testing protocols and methodologies for BCAs. This inconsistency breeds confusion and hinders fair comparisons between products, ultimately impacting market access and adoption. Varying testing protocols lead to data inconsistencies, making it difficult to interpret results definitively and draw reliable conclusions about efficacy and safety. This can create ambiguity for regulators and uncertainty for potential users. Farmers rely on reliable data and clear evidence before transitioning to new approaches. The lack of standardized testing makes it difficult for them to compare BCAs and assess their viability for their specific needs. Without robust and consistent testing protocols, there's a potential for unforeseen impacts on environmental health and human well-being due to ineffective or harmful BCAs reaching the market.

High Testing Costs

The burgeoning Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market holds immense promise for a more sustainable future, but one significant hurdle stands in the way: high testing costs. Compared to their synthetic counterparts, these living agents face a much more complex and multifaceted testing process, driving up expenses and creating a barrier for both manufacturers and farmers. Unlike synthetic pesticides with consistent chemical properties, biologicals are living organisms susceptible to environmental factors, storage conditions, and even strain variations. This inherent variability demands extensive, multifaceted testing to ensure efficacy and safety across diverse conditions. Assessing the effectiveness of biologicals often requires lengthy field trials under real-world conditions. This includes monitoring their impact on pests, plant health, and the environment over multiple seasons, significantly pushing up the time and expense of testing. Compared to synthetic pesticide testing, evaluating biologicals often requires specialized laboratories, equipment, and trained personnel equipped to handle living organisms and analyze complex biological interactions. This specialized infrastructure contributes to higher testing costs. Start-ups and smaller players entering the biologicals market face a significant disadvantage due to high testing costs. This can stifle innovation and limit the diversity of available solutions. Farmers, particularly those in developing nations, might be hesitant to switch to biologicals due to the perceived higher cost associated with testing and certification. This slows down the overall transition towards sustainable agricultural practices.

Key Market Trends

Diversifying Biological Products

Traditionally, the market primarily focused on biopesticides as alternatives to synthetic pesticides. The wider adoption of diverse biological products can significantly reduce dependence on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, minimizing environmental harm and promoting biodiversity. Biofertilizers and microbial inoculants enhance soil fertility and plant health, leading to improved crop yields and resilience against pests and diseases. Farmers can choose biological products tailored to their specific soil conditions, crop types, and pest issues, promoting more efficient and effective pest and disease management. Development of new testing methods and technologies specifically designed for different types of biological products is crucial to provide accurate and reliable data. Collaboration between testing labs, researchers, and industry players is key to developing standardized protocols and best practices for testing diverse biological products. As consumer demand for sustainable food grows, transparent and reliable data on the efficacy and safety of diverse biological products through rigorous testing will build trust and foster wider adoption.

Focus on Field-Based Testing

Traditional lab testing often struggles to capture the intricate interactions between biologicals, plants, and the environment. Field trials, conducted under real-world conditions, provide a more accurate picture of a biological product's efficacy and long-term impacts on soil health, pest control, and crop yields. Unlike synthetic pesticides with consistent chemical properties, biologicals are living organisms susceptible to environmental factors like temperature, humidity, and soil conditions. Field testing helps account for this variability and assess the effectiveness of biologicals across diverse agricultural settings. Farmers, who ultimately make the decision to adopt these solutions, need convincing evidence of their effectiveness under real-world conditions. Field-based testing data provides the level of assurance they seek before making the switch from synthetic methods. Field trials generate valuable data on how different environmental factors and agricultural practices influence the performance of biologicals. This information can be used to develop tailored recommendations for specific regions, crops, and pest scenarios, optimizing their effectiveness. Reliable data from field trials can build trust among farmers and accelerate the adoption of diverse biological control agents and soil health solutions. Data generated from field trials can be used to develop precision agriculture strategies that utilize biologicals in a targeted and efficient manner, optimizing their performance and minimizing environmental impact.

Segmental Insights

Type Insights

Based on type, Biopesticides emerged as the dominating segment in the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market during the forecast period. Biopesticides are derived from natural sources, such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses, and can effectively target a wide range of pests, including insects, mites, and weeds. This versatility makes them a valuable tool for farmers looking to protect their crops without resorting to harmful chemicals. Consumers are increasingly concerned about the potential health and environmental hazards associated with synthetic pesticides. This has led to a growing demand for food produced using safer and more sustainable methods, including the use of biopesticides. Research and development in the biopesticides field is booming, leading to the creation of new and more effective products. This constant innovation necessitates comprehensive testing to ensure the efficacy, safety, and quality of these new biopesticides before they reach the market.

End User Insights

Based on end user, Biological Product Manufacturers segment is projected to experience rapid growth in the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market during the forecast period. Consumers are increasingly seeking food produced using sustainable and organic practices. This shift in preference is driven by concerns about the environmental and health impacts of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers. As a result, the demand for biofertilizers, biopesticides, and biostimulants, which are derived from natural sources, is growing rapidly. Regulatory bodies worldwide are implementing stricter regulations on the use of synthetic pesticides due to their potential harmful effects on human health and the environment. This is creating a favorable environment for the adoption of biological alternatives, which are generally considered safer and more environmentally friendly. Focus on Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a sustainable approach to pest control that emphasizes preventative measures and the use of multiple control methods, including biological control agents. This integrated approach often incorporates the use of agricultural biologicals to manage pest populations, further driving demand for testing services.

Regional Insights

Based on region, North America emerged as the dominant region in the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market in 2023. North America, particularly the United States, has a large and robust agricultural sector. The size and economic strength of the agriculture industry in the region contribute to its dominance in related markets, including agricultural biologicals testing. The region is known for its advancements in technology and innovation. The adoption of cutting-edge testing technologies and methodologies in agricultural practices may have contributed to North America's leadership in agricultural biologicals testing. North America typically has well-established and stringent regulatory frameworks governing agriculture and related industries. This regulatory environment can create a demand for comprehensive testing services to ensure compliance with standards, leading to a dominant market position. The region often invests significantly in research and development, fostering the growth of new technologies and methodologies in the agricultural sector. This emphasis on innovation can positively impact the agricultural biologicals testing market. The increasing emphasis on sustainable agriculture practices in North America may drive the demand for testing services related to agricultural biologicals, contributing to the region's dominance in this market.

Key Market Players

Eurofins Scientific SE

Biotecnologie B.T. Srl.

SynTech Research Inc.

R J Hill Laboratories Limited

LAUS GmbH

Intertek Group plc

Bureau Veritas SA

ALS Limited

TUV NORD AG

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market, By Type:

    Biopesticides Biofertilizers Biostimulants

Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market, By Product:

    Field Support Analytical Regulatory

Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market, By End User:

    Biological Product Manufacturers Government Agencies Others

Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market, By Region:

    North America

United States

Canada

Mexico

    Europe

Germany

United Kingdom

France

Italy

Spain

    Asia Pacific

China

Japan

India

Australia

South Korea

    South America

Brazil

Argentina

Colombia

    Middle East & Africa

South Africa

Saudi Arabia

UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies presents in the Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Scope of the Market
    • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
    • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
    • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Overview of the Market
  • 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
  • 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
  • 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
  • 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Type (Biopesticides, Biofertilizers and Biostimulants)
    • 5.2.2. By Product (Field Support, Analytical and Regulatory)
    • 5.2.3. By End User (Biological Product Manufacturers, Government Agencies and Others)
    • 5.2.4. By Region
    • 5.2.5. By Company (2023)
  • 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Type
    • 6.2.2. By Product
    • 6.2.3. By End User
    • 6.2.4. By Country
  • 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
    • 6.3.1. United States Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.2.1. By Type
        • 6.3.1.2.2. By Product
        • 6.3.1.2.3. By End User
    • 6.3.2. Canada Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.2.1. By Type
        • 6.3.2.2.2. By Product
        • 6.3.2.2.3. By End User
    • 6.3.3. Mexico Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.2.1. By Type
        • 6.3.3.2.2. By Product
        • 6.3.3.2.3. By End User

7. Europe Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Type
    • 7.2.2. By Product
    • 7.2.3. By End User
    • 7.2.4. By Country
  • 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
    • 7.3.1. Germany Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.2.1. By Type
        • 7.3.1.2.2. By Product
        • 7.3.1.2.3. By End User
    • 7.3.2. United Kingdom Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.2.1. By Type
        • 7.3.2.2.2. By Product
        • 7.3.2.2.3. By End User
    • 7.3.3. Italy Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.2.1. By Type
        • 7.3.3.2.2. By Product
        • 7.3.3.2.3. By End User
    • 7.3.4. France Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.2.1. By Type
        • 7.3.4.2.2. By Product
        • 7.3.4.2.3. By End User
    • 7.3.5. Spain Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.2.1. By Type
        • 7.3.5.2.2. By Product
        • 7.3.5.2.3. By End User

8. Asia Pacific Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Type
    • 8.2.2. By Product
    • 8.2.3. By End User
    • 8.2.4. By Country
  • 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
    • 8.3.1. China Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.2.1. By Type
        • 8.3.1.2.2. By Product
        • 8.3.1.2.3. By End User
    • 8.3.2. India Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.2.1. By Type
        • 8.3.2.2.2. By Product
        • 8.3.2.2.3. By End User
    • 8.3.3. Japan Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.2.1. By Type
        • 8.3.3.2.2. By Product
        • 8.3.3.2.3. By End User
    • 8.3.4. South Korea Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.2.1. By Type
        • 8.3.4.2.2. By Product
        • 8.3.4.2.3. By End User
    • 8.3.5. Australia Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.2.1. By Type
        • 8.3.5.2.2. By Product
        • 8.3.5.2.3. By End User

9. South America Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Type
    • 9.2.2. By Product
    • 9.2.3. By End User
    • 9.2.4. By Country
  • 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Brazil Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.2.1. By Type
        • 9.3.1.2.2. By Product
        • 9.3.1.2.3. By End User
    • 9.3.2. Argentina Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.2.1. By Type
        • 9.3.2.2.2. By Product
        • 9.3.2.2.3. By End User
    • 9.3.3. Colombia Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.2.1. By Type
        • 9.3.3.2.2. By Product
        • 9.3.3.2.3. By End User

10. Middle East and Africa Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook

  • 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 10.1.1. By Value
  • 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 10.2.1. By Type
    • 10.2.2. By Product
    • 10.2.3. By End User
    • 10.2.4. By Country
  • 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
    • 10.3.1. South Africa Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.2.1. By Type
        • 10.3.1.2.2. By Product
        • 10.3.1.2.3. By End User
    • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.2.1. By Type
        • 10.3.2.2.2. By Product
        • 10.3.2.2.3. By End User
    • 10.3.3. UAE Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market Outlook
      • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.2.1. By Type
        • 10.3.3.2.2. By Product
        • 10.3.3.2.3. By End User

11. Market Dynamics

  • 11.1. Drivers
  • 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

  • 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
  • 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
  • 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Porters Five Forces Analysis

  • 13.1. Competition in the Industry
  • 13.2. Potential of New Entrants
  • 13.3. Power of Suppliers
  • 13.4. Power of Customers
  • 13.5. Threat of Substitute Products

14. Competitive Landscape

  • 14.1. Eurofins Scientific SE
    • 14.1.1. Business Overview
    • 14.1.2. Company Snapshot
    • 14.1.3. Products & Services
    • 14.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
    • 14.1.5. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.6. Key Personnel Details
    • 14.1.7. SWOT Analysis
  • 14.2. Biotecnologie B.T. Srl.
  • 14.3. SynTech Research Inc.
  • 14.4. R J Hill Laboratories Limited
  • 14.5. LAUS GmbH
  • 14.6. Intertek Group plc
  • 14.7. Bureau Veritas SA
  • 14.8. ALS Limited
  • 14.9. TUV NORD AG

15. Strategic Recommendations

16. About Us & Disclaimer