查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1643086

近距離武器系統市場 - 全球產業規模、佔有率、趨勢、機會和預測，按類型（槍基、飛彈）、平台（陸地、海軍）、地區和競爭細分，2020-2030F

Close-in Weapon Systems Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Type (Gun-Based, Missile-Based), By Platform (Terrestrial, Naval), By Region & Competition, 2020-2030F
出版日期: | 出版商: TechSci Research | 英文 184 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

We offer 8 hour analyst time for an additional research. Please contact us for the details.

簡介目錄

2024年全球近程武器系統市值為75億美元，預估至2030年將達120.4億美元，預測期間內複合年成長率為8.21%。由於國防支出的增加、海軍防禦技術的進步以及海上安全威脅的增加，全球近程武器系統市場正在成長。 CIWS主要用於保護艦船免受反艦飛彈和飛機的攻擊。該市場是由海軍艦隊現代化推動的，特別是在美國、中國和印度等國家。雷達系統、自動化和改進的火控系統等技術進步是主要趨勢。市場也受到地緣政治緊張局勢和增強防禦能力需求的影響。到 2030 年，在持續的國防合約和採購計劃的推動下，市場預計將顯著成長。

市場概況
預測期 2026-2030
2024 年市場規模 75億美元
2030 年市場規模 120.4億美元
2025-2030 年複合年成長率 8.21%
成長最快的細分市場 槍基
最大的市場 北美洲

市場促進因素

地緣政治緊張局勢和安全疑慮不斷加劇

武器和防禦系統的技術進步

海軍艦隊和國防預算的現代化

對綜合防禦解決方案的需求不斷成長

主要市場挑戰

開發和維護成本高

技術複雜性和整合問題

不斷變化的威脅和適應性

主要市場趨勢

人工智慧 (AI) 和機器學習 (ML) 的整合

轉向定向能武器（DEW）

強調多層防禦系統

專注於現有系統的升級和現代化

細分市場洞察

類型洞察

區域洞察

目錄

第 1 章：簡介

第 2 章：研究方法

第 3 章：執行摘要

第 4 章：全球近程武器系統市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型（槍基、飛彈）
    • 按平台（陸地、海軍）
    • 按地區分類
    • 按排名前 5 名的公司及其他 (2024 年)
  • 全球近程武器系統市場測繪與機會評估
    • 按類型
    • 按平台
    • 按地區分類

第 5 章：北美近程武器系統市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型
    • 按平台
    • 按國家/地區

第 6 章：歐洲與獨立國協近程武器系統市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型
    • 按平台
    • 按國家/地區

第 7 章：亞太地區近程武器系統市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型
    • 按平台
    • 按國家/地區

第 8 章：中東和非洲近程武器系統市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型
    • 按平台
    • 按國家/地區

第 9 章：南美洲近程武器系統市場展望

  • 市場規模及預測
    • 按價值
  • 市佔率及預測
    • 按類型
    • 按平台
    • 按國家/地區

第 10 章：市場動態

  • 促進要素
  • 挑戰

第 11 章：COVID-19 對全球近程武器系統市場的影響

  • 影響評估模型
    • 受影響的關鍵領域
    • 受影響的主要地區
    • 受影響的主要國家

第 12 章：市場趨勢與發展

第13章：競爭格局

  • 公司簡介
    • ASELSAN AS
    • . BAE Systems plc
    • Leonardo SpA
    • Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
    • RTX Corporation
    • Rheinmetall AG
    • Thales SA
    • MBDA Inc.
    • Lockheed Martin Corporation
    • General Dynamics Corporation

第 14 章：策略建議/行動計劃

  • 重點關注領域
  • 目標類型
  • 目標平台

第15章調查會社について,免責事項

簡介目錄
Product Code: 27176

The Global Close-in Weapon Systems Market was valued at USD 7.50 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 12.04 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 8.21% during the forecast period. The Global Close-In Weapon Systems market is growing due to increasing defense spending, advancements in naval defense technologies, and rising threats in maritime security. CIWS are primarily used to protect ships from anti-ship missiles and aircraft. The market is driven by modernization of naval fleets, particularly in countries like the U.S., China, and India. Technological advancements such as radar systems, automation, and improved fire control systems are key trends. The market is also influenced by geopolitical tensions and the need for enhanced defense capabilities. By 2030, the market is expected to witness significant growth, driven by ongoing defense contracts and procurement programs.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2026-2030
Market Size 2024USD 7.50 Billion
Market Size 2030USD 12.04 Billion
CAGR 2025-20308.21%
Fastest Growing SegmentGun-Based
Largest MarketNorth America

Market Drivers

Rising Geopolitical Tensions and Security Concerns

The global Close-In Weapon Systems (CIWS) market is heavily driven by increasing geopolitical tensions and security concerns. As countries navigate complex international relations and respond to regional instabilities, the demand for enhanced defense systems rises. In particular, maritime security is a primary concern as nations look to protect their naval assets and territories. The expansion of naval fleets by rising naval powers such as the United States, China, and India has led to greater investments in CIWS to safeguard military vessels against emerging threats, including anti-ship missiles, fast attack crafts, and aircraft. The growing frequency of naval confrontations, piracy, and territorial disputes in critical waterways such as the South China Sea, the Persian Gulf, and the Mediterranean Sea further amplifies the need for advanced CIWS solutions. This increased geopolitical instability not only heightens defense budgets but also accelerates the procurement and modernization of naval fleets, driving market growth. Additionally, threats posed by non-state actors and asymmetrical warfare tactics continue to drive countries to ensure their naval forces remain secure against a range of hostile engagements.

Technological Advancements in Weaponry and Defense Systems

Technological advancements play a crucial role in the expansion of the global CIWS market. Modern CIWS are becoming increasingly sophisticated, incorporating cutting-edge technologies like automated fire control systems, radar systems, and high-speed tracking capabilities. These systems are designed to quickly detect, track, and neutralize incoming threats with minimal human intervention. For instance, advancements in radar technologies, such as phased-array radar, allow CIWS to efficiently track multiple targets simultaneously, improving the overall effectiveness of these systems. In 2024, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. announced the receipt of a USD 1.45 billion contract for the MACH-TB 2.0 (Multi-Axis Technology Demonstrator - Tactical Ballistic) system. This contract focuses on advanced hypersonic weapons systems. Additionally, innovations in laser systems, directed energy weapons, and high-velocity projectile technologies are enhancing the performance of CIWS. Automation within these systems is another important factor, as it reduces the reaction time required to counter incoming threats, which is crucial in fast-paced combat scenarios. These technological developments ensure that CIWS continue to evolve in line with emerging threats, providing stronger defense mechanisms for naval vessels. The constant improvement in radar and targeting systems ensures higher accuracy and better engagement ranges, making CIWS an essential part of modern naval defense.

Modernization of Naval Fleets and Defense Budgets

The modernization of naval fleets is a significant driver of the CIWS market. Many countries are undertaking extensive programs to update and refurbish their naval forces, integrating next-generation systems to ensure combat readiness and security in contemporary conflict scenarios. This includes upgrading existing vessels with state-of-the-art CIWS to improve the protection of naval platforms against fast-moving airborne threats and missiles. The need for increased capabilities in the face of emerging threats, such as hypersonic missiles, drones, and advanced aircraft, pushes navies to incorporate more advanced close-in defense systems. As military spending continues to rise globally, particularly in defense-heavy regions like North America, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, more countries are investing in CIWS to enhance the survivability and operational effectiveness of their fleets. The United States, for example, has committed to enhancing its naval defense systems under the U.S. Navy's "Distributed Maritime Operations" strategy, which aims to improve fleet protection against emerging threats. Similarly, China and India have also been investing heavily in modernizing their naval fleets, creating substantial demand for CIWS. The increase in defense budgets, driven by national security priorities and the desire to assert military dominance, further contributes to the growth of the CIWS market, as nations seek to bolster their naval protection mechanisms.

Growing Demand for Integrated Defense Solutions

The increasing demand for integrated defense solutions is another key driver behind the global CIWS market. Modern naval defense strategies require coordinated, multi-layered defense systems to protect naval assets from a wide variety of threats. As such, CIWS is being integrated into broader naval defense architectures, which include long-range missile systems, electronic warfare capabilities, and naval surveillance systems. The demand for a holistic defense network that can ensure seamless interoperability between various defense systems is pushing CIWS manufacturers to innovate. These systems are now designed to complement and work in synergy with other defense technologies, such as shipborne radars and missile defense systems, offering a robust and reliable defense solution. Integration with advanced detection systems, automated threat analysis, and the coordination with wider naval defense strategies make CIWS a critical component of modern naval warfare. This trend towards integrated solutions is driving the growth of the market as nations invest in comprehensive defense capabilities to address the complexity of modern warfare. The desire to equip naval vessels with multi-dimensional protection mechanisms, from long-range to close-in defense, further fuels the need for advanced CIWS. As defense priorities shift towards more resilient and adaptable naval defense strategies, the market for CIWS is expected to grow alongside the trend of integrated defense technologies.

Key Market Challenges

High Costs of Development and Maintenance

One of the major challenges faced by the global Close-In Weapon Systems (CIWS) market is the high costs associated with the development, installation, and maintenance of these advanced systems. CIWS are technologically complex, requiring significant investment in research and development to integrate new features such as advanced radar, automation, and precision targeting. These systems often rely on cutting-edge technologies, such as high-powered lasers or electromagnetic weapons, which demand high levels of investment in both development and manufacturing. Additionally, the integration of CIWS into existing naval vessels can be costly, requiring modifications to ship infrastructure and systems to ensure compatibility. Moreover, the long-term maintenance of CIWS is expensive, as these systems require regular upgrades and servicing to keep up with evolving threats and technological advancements. For countries with limited defense budgets, the high costs associated with CIWS procurement and maintenance can be a barrier, especially in comparison to other defense priorities. This challenge is particularly pressing in emerging markets or smaller naval powers, where defense budgets may not allow for widespread deployment of these advanced systems, limiting the market's growth in some regions.

Technological Complexity and Integration Issues

The technological complexity of CIWS presents another challenge for their adoption and effective operation. While advancements in radar, automation, and missile interception capabilities have made CIWS more effective, these systems are highly sophisticated and require specialized knowledge for their design, deployment, and operation. The integration of CIWS into existing naval fleets can often be a complex and time-consuming process, as it necessitates compatibility with other defense systems, such as radar networks, missile defense systems, and onboard communication platforms. Additionally, due to their advanced features, the systems require highly trained personnel for operation and maintenance, which can pose a challenge for countries with less developed naval expertise. Moreover, rapid technological changes and the fast pace of military innovation mean that naval forces must continuously invest in upgrades to keep their CIWS capable of dealing with emerging threats like hypersonic missiles and advanced drones. These integration and operational challenges increase the time and cost needed for adoption, potentially slowing the growth of the market, especially in regions with limited technological infrastructure or expertise. Inconsistent integration across different platforms can also lead to inefficiencies or vulnerabilities within a nation's broader naval defense strategy.

Evolving Threats and Adaptability

The constantly evolving nature of security threats poses a significant challenge to the CIWS market. While CIWS is specifically designed to counter fast-moving airborne threats such as missiles, aircraft, and drones, the rapidly changing landscape of military technology means that these systems must continuously evolve to stay ahead of increasingly sophisticated adversarial threats. One of the major challenges is countering the growing threat posed by hypersonic missiles, which travel at speeds greater than five times the speed of sound, making them extremely difficult to intercept. Traditional CIWS, designed for slower-moving threats, may struggle to defend against such advanced missile technologies, leading to the need for constant upgrades to the systems. Additionally, the proliferation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and drones, which are becoming increasingly prevalent in modern warfare, presents another challenge. These fast and low-cost threats require CIWS to adapt rapidly to new detection and interception methods. As defense systems must always be prepared for new and unexpected forms of attack, manufacturers must continually innovate to ensure their CIWS can respond to evolving threats, resulting in increased R&D and investment in the sector. This constant need for adaptability and innovation creates a significant challenge in ensuring CIWS remain effective in countering the next generation of threats, while also managing the associated costs and technological hurdles.

Key Market Trends

Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

One of the prominent trends in the global Close-In Weapon Systems (CIWS) market is the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to enhance the capabilities of defense systems. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has allocated a budget of USD 1.8 billion for AI applications in 2024. AI and ML technologies are increasingly being utilized to improve the speed and precision of threat detection, identification, and interception in CIWS. These technologies enable real-time data analysis, allowing for more accurate and faster decision-making processes in critical situations. AI-driven systems can process vast amounts of sensor data from radar, cameras, and other detection technologies to automatically identify and prioritize threats, reducing the response time and reliance on human operators. For example, AI is being used to train CIWS systems to recognize missile trajectories, calculate interception paths, and optimize firing solutions. Additionally, machine learning algorithms allow CIWS to adapt to new and emerging threats by learning from past engagements, improving the system's overall effectiveness over time. As the defense sector moves toward autonomous and semi-autonomous systems, the use of AI and ML in CIWS ensures these systems are more capable of defending against a wide range of threats, from advanced missile technologies to drones and other unconventional weapons. The increasing adoption of AI and ML in CIWS is setting the stage for more intelligent and responsive naval defense systems in the future, driving growth in the market.

Shift Towards Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs)

A significant trend shaping the CIWS market is the growing interest in Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) as part of naval defense strategies. DEWs, including high-energy lasers and microwave weapons, are being explored as alternative or complementary solutions to traditional kinetic CIWS. These technologies offer several advantages, such as the ability to engage multiple targets at the speed of light, a lower cost per shot, and the potential for virtually unlimited ammunition. DEWs can also be more effective in neutralizing fast-moving threats, such as drones and missiles, compared to traditional projectile-based systems. The U.S. Navy, for example, has been testing laser weapon systems aboard its vessels, with successful demonstrations of high-energy laser weapons capable of shooting down drones and small boats. The integration of DEWs into CIWS is particularly attractive as these systems provide more precise and scalable responses to threats, minimizing the need for traditional ammunition and reducing the overall logistics burden. Furthermore, DEWs are often touted for their ability to operate in electronic warfare environments, where traditional systems might be jammed or disrupted. The growing emphasis on DEWs in the defense sector is leading to advancements in laser technologies, which are expected to improve over time, potentially revolutionizing the CIWS market. This trend is expected to continue as naval forces prioritize efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and adaptability in the face of evolving threats.

Emphasis on Multi-Layered Defense Systems

Another key trend in the CIWS market is the growing emphasis on multi-layered defense systems. Modern naval warfare strategies are increasingly focused on creating integrated defense networks that combine long-range missile defense, electronic warfare, and close-in weapons into a cohesive and complementary system. This approach enhances the survivability of naval vessels by providing multiple layers of defense, each addressing different types of threats at varying ranges. CIWS, with its ability to intercept short-range and fast-moving threats, is increasingly being integrated with other defense systems such as Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense, THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense), and other medium- and long-range missile defense technologies. This integration ensures that naval platforms have comprehensive defense capabilities, providing a layered defense structure that can engage a variety of threats from long-range missiles to small drones. Moreover, the integration of CIWS with radar systems, advanced sensors, and command-and-control networks ensures that these systems can respond to threats in a coordinated and efficient manner. Multi-layered defense strategies are particularly important in environments where naval forces face multiple, simultaneous threats, and the integration of CIWS into these systems allows for faster reaction times and more accurate interceptions. As navies modernize their fleets, the adoption of multi-layered defense systems is becoming more prevalent, driving demand for CIWS that can seamlessly operate within these larger defense frameworks.

Focus on Upgrades and Modernization of Existing Systems

A growing trend in the CIWS market is the focus on upgrading and modernizing existing systems rather than completely replacing them with new ones. Many countries with established naval fleets are opting to enhance the capabilities of their current CIWS to improve performance and extend their operational life. This trend is driven by the high costs associated with procuring new systems, as well as the fact that modernizing existing assets can be more cost-effective than purchasing new technologies. Upgrades often include the integration of newer radar and targeting systems, automation features, and enhanced missile defense capabilities. Additionally, existing CIWS platforms are being retrofitted with advanced software and hardware to enhance their ability to counter emerging threats, such as hypersonic missiles, drones, and unmanned surface vehicles. For example, older CIWS like the Phalanx system are being updated with more advanced versions of the Block 1B or Block 2, which incorporate more advanced sensor systems and better software for faster threat identification and engagement. Similarly, many navies are incorporating advanced artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms into their legacy systems to boost their efficiency and reduce human intervention. This trend of upgrading and modernizing existing CIWS is particularly noticeable among established naval forces, such as those of the United States, Russia, and NATO members, where cost efficiency and technological enhancement of existing assets are key priorities. As navies around the world continue to balance defense budgets with the need for upgraded capabilities, the trend of modernization is expected to play a significant role in the growth of the CIWS market.

Segmental Insights

Type Insights

The gun-based segment is emerging as the fastest-growing in the global Close-In Weapon Systems (CIWS) market due to its proven reliability, rapid response capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. Gun-based systems, such as the Phalanx CIWS, are widely used for countering a variety of threats, including missiles, aircraft, and small boats, with their high rate of fire and precision targeting. These systems are preferred for their operational simplicity and ability to function in adverse weather conditions, making them a versatile defense solution. As naval forces focus on enhancing fleet protection, demand for advanced, gun-based CIWS is accelerating, driving market growth.

Regional Insights

North America is the dominant region in the global Close-In Weapon Systems (CIWS) market, driven primarily by the United States' substantial defense budget and advanced naval capabilities. The U.S. Navy is a key adopter of CIWS technologies, investing heavily in modernizing its fleet and integrating state-of-the-art CIWS solutions to protect its vessels from emerging threats. The region benefits from strong technological advancements, robust research and development efforts, and significant defense contracts. Additionally, ongoing military modernization programs and the strategic importance of naval power in maintaining global security contribute to North America's leadership in the CIWS market.

Key Market Players

  • ASELSAN A.S.
  • BAE Systems plc
  • General Dynamics Corporation
  • Leonardo S.p.A.
  • Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
  • RTX Corporation
  • Rheinmetall AG
  • Thales S.A.
  • MBDA Inc.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation

Report Scope:

In this report, the global Close-in Weapon Systems Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Close-in Weapon Systems Market, By Type:

  • Gun-Based
  • Missile-Based

Close-in Weapon Systems Market, By Platform:

  • Terrestrial
  • Naval

Close-in Weapon Systems Market, By Region:

  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • France
    • Germany
    • Spain
    • Italy
    • United Kingdom
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • Vietnam
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Thailand
  • Middle East & Africa
    • South Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Turkey
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies presents in the global Close-in Weapon Systems Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Close-in Weapon Systems Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

  • 1.1. Market Overview
  • 1.2. Key Highlights of the Report
  • 1.3. Market Coverage
  • 1.4. Market Segments Covered
  • 1.5. Research Tenure Considered

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Market Overview
  • 3.2. Market Forecast
  • 3.3. Key Regions
  • 3.4. Key Segments

4. Global Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook

  • 4.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 4.1.1. By Value
  • 4.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 4.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis (Gun-Based, Missile-Based)
    • 4.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis (Terrestrial, Naval)
    • 4.2.3. By Regional Market Share Analysis
      • 4.2.3.1. North America Market Share Analysis
      • 4.2.3.2. Europe & CIS Market Share Analysis
      • 4.2.3.3. Asia-Pacific Market Share Analysis
      • 4.2.3.4. Middle East & Africa Market Share Analysis
      • 4.2.3.5. South America Market Share Analysis
    • 4.2.4. By Top 5 Companies Market Share Analysis, Others (2024)
  • 4.3. Global Close-in Weapon Systems Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment
    • 4.3.1. By Type Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment
    • 4.3.2. By Platform Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment
    • 4.3.3. By Regional Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment

5. North America Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
    • 5.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
    • 5.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis
      • 5.2.3.1. United States Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 5.2.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 5.2.3.1.1.1. By Value
        • 5.2.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 5.2.3.1.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 5.2.3.1.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 5.2.3.2. Canada Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 5.2.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 5.2.3.2.1.1. By Value
        • 5.2.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 5.2.3.2.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 5.2.3.2.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 5.2.3.3. Mexico Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 5.2.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 5.2.3.3.1.1. By Value
        • 5.2.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 5.2.3.3.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 5.2.3.3.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis

6. Europe & CIS Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
    • 6.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
    • 6.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis
      • 6.2.3.1. France Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 6.2.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.2.3.1.1.1. By Value
        • 6.2.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.2.3.1.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 6.2.3.1.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 6.2.3.2. Germany Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 6.2.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.2.3.2.1.1. By Value
        • 6.2.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.2.3.2.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 6.2.3.2.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 6.2.3.3. Spain Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 6.2.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.2.3.3.1.1. By Value
        • 6.2.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.2.3.3.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 6.2.3.3.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 6.2.3.4. Italy Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 6.2.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.2.3.4.1.1. By Value
        • 6.2.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.2.3.4.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 6.2.3.4.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 6.2.3.5. United Kingdom Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 6.2.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.2.3.5.1.1. By Value
        • 6.2.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.2.3.5.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 6.2.3.5.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis

7. Asia-Pacific Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
    • 7.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
    • 7.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis
      • 7.2.3.1. China Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 7.2.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.1.1.1. By Value
        • 7.2.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.1.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 7.2.3.1.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 7.2.3.2. Japan Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 7.2.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.2.1.1. By Value
        • 7.2.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.2.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 7.2.3.2.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 7.2.3.3. India Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 7.2.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.3.1.1. By Value
        • 7.2.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.3.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 7.2.3.3.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 7.2.3.4. Vietnam Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 7.2.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.4.1.1. By Value
        • 7.2.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.4.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 7.2.3.4.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 7.2.3.5. South Korea Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 7.2.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.5.1.1. By Value
        • 7.2.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.5.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 7.2.3.5.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 7.2.3.6. Australia Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 7.2.3.6.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.6.1.1. By Value
        • 7.2.3.6.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.6.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 7.2.3.6.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 7.2.3.7. Thailand Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 7.2.3.7.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.7.1.1. By Value
        • 7.2.3.7.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.2.3.7.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 7.2.3.7.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis

8. Middle East & Africa Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
    • 8.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
    • 8.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis
      • 8.2.3.1. South Africa Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 8.2.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.2.3.1.1.1. By Value
        • 8.2.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.2.3.1.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 8.2.3.1.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 8.2.3.2. Saudi Arabia Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 8.2.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.2.3.2.1.1. By Value
        • 8.2.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.2.3.2.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 8.2.3.2.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 8.2.3.3. UAE Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 8.2.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.2.3.3.1.1. By Value
        • 8.2.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.2.3.3.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 8.2.3.3.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 8.2.3.4. Turkey Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 8.2.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.2.3.4.1.1. By Value
        • 8.2.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.2.3.4.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 8.2.3.4.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis

9. South America Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
    • 9.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
    • 9.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis
      • 9.2.3.1. Brazil Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 9.2.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.2.3.1.1.1. By Value
        • 9.2.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.2.3.1.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 9.2.3.1.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis
      • 9.2.3.2. Argentina Close-in Weapon Systems Market Outlook
        • 9.2.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.2.3.2.1.1. By Value
        • 9.2.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.2.3.2.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis
        • 9.2.3.2.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis

10. Market Dynamics

  • 10.1. Drivers
  • 10.2. Challenges

11. Impact of COVID-19 on Global Close-in Weapon Systems Market

  • 11.1. Impact Assessment Model
    • 11.1.1. Key Segments Impacted
    • 11.1.2. Key Regions Impacted
    • 11.1.3. Key Countries Impacted

12. Market Trends & Developments

13. Competitive Landscape

  • 13.1. Company Profiles
    • 13.1.1. ASELSAN A.S.
      • 13.1.1.1. Company Details
      • 13.1.1.2. Products
      • 13.1.1.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
      • 13.1.1.4. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence
      • 13.1.1.5. Recent Developments
      • 13.1.1.6. Key Management Personnel
    • 13.1.2. . BAE Systems plc
      • 13.1.2.1. Company Details
      • 13.1.2.2. Products
      • 13.1.2.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
      • 13.1.2.4. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence
      • 13.1.2.5. Recent Developments
      • 13.1.2.6. Key Management Personnel
    • 13.1.3. Leonardo S.p.A.
      • 13.1.3.1. Company Details
      • 13.1.3.2. Products
      • 13.1.3.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
      • 13.1.3.4. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence
      • 13.1.3.5. Recent Developments
      • 13.1.3.6. Key Management Personnel
    • 13.1.4. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
      • 13.1.4.1. Company Details
      • 13.1.4.2. Products
      • 13.1.4.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
      • 13.1.4.4. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence
      • 13.1.4.5. Recent Developments
      • 13.1.4.6. Key Management Personnel
    • 13.1.5. RTX Corporation
      • 13.1.5.1. Company Details
      • 13.1.5.2. Products
      • 13.1.5.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
      • 13.1.5.4. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence
      • 13.1.5.5. Recent Developments
      • 13.1.5.6. Key Management Personnel
    • 13.1.6. Rheinmetall AG
      • 13.1.6.1. Company Details
      • 13.1.6.2. Products
      • 13.1.6.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
      • 13.1.6.4. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence
      • 13.1.6.5. Recent Developments
      • 13.1.6.6. Key Management Personnel
    • 13.1.7. Thales S.A.
      • 13.1.7.1. Company Details
      • 13.1.7.2. Products
      • 13.1.7.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
      • 13.1.7.4. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence
      • 13.1.7.5. Recent Developments
      • 13.1.7.6. Key Management Personnel
    • 13.1.8. MBDA Inc.
      • 13.1.8.1. Company Details
      • 13.1.8.2. Products
      • 13.1.8.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
      • 13.1.8.4. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence
      • 13.1.8.5. Recent Developments
      • 13.1.8.6. Key Management Personnel
    • 13.1.9. Lockheed Martin Corporation
      • 13.1.9.1. Company Details
      • 13.1.9.2. Products
      • 13.1.9.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
      • 13.1.9.4. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence
      • 13.1.9.5. Recent Developments
      • 13.1.9.6. Key Management Personnel
    • 13.1.10. General Dynamics Corporation
      • 13.1.10.1. Company Details
      • 13.1.10.2. Products
      • 13.1.10.3. Financials (As Per Availability)
      • 13.1.10.4. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence
      • 13.1.10.5. Recent Developments
      • 13.1.10.6. Key Management Personnel

14. Strategic Recommendations/Action Plan

  • 14.1. Key Focus Areas
  • 14.2. Target Type
  • 14.3. Target Platform

15. About Us & Disclaimer