![]() |
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1623041
全球 APT 攻擊防護市場規模(依解決方案、服務、部署模式、地區、範圍和預測)Global Advanced Persistent Threat Protection Market Size By Solutions, By Services, By Deployment Modes, By Geographic Scope And Forecast |
2023 年 APT 對抗措施市場規模價值 142.3 億美元,預計到 2030 年將達到 427 億美元,預測期內(2024-2030 年)的複合年增長率為 17.25%。
進階持續性攻擊防護的全球市場推動因素
APT 攻擊防護市場的市場推動因素會受到多種因素的影響。
網路攻擊日益複雜
組織越來越容易受到針對敏感資訊、智慧財產權和關鍵基礎設施的高階持續性威脅 (APT) 的攻擊。網路攻擊的複雜性和頻率日益提高,推動了對強大的 APT 保護解決方案的需求。
對網路安全的關注與意識日益增強:
臭名昭著的資料外洩、勒索軟體攻擊和其他網路安全事故讓公司意識到建立強大的 APT 防禦措施的重要性。對高階威脅偵測和回應能力的投資主要源於對資料保護、法規遵循和業務連續性的擔憂。
物聯網設備和雲端運算的使用日益增加:
雲端服務、行動裝置和物聯網 (IoT) 裝置的使用增加增加了網路犯罪分子的攻擊面,使組織更容易受到進階持續性威脅 (APT)。隨著企業進行數位轉型項目,確保基於雲端的基礎設施、行動端點和物聯網生態系統的安全對於減少 APT 威脅至關重要。
監理合規要求:
為了遵守《一般資料保護條例》、《加州消費者隱私法案》、《健康保險流通與責任法案》和《支付卡產業資料安全標準》(PCI DSS)等嚴格的監管框架,組織必須保護敏感資料並防止未經授權的存取。法規合規性正在推動反 APT 解決方案的採用,以防止資料外洩和違反合規性。
對即時威脅情報和分析的需求:
為了快速識別、評估和應對 APT,組織需要即時瞭解其 IT 環境。人們越來越需要先進的威脅情報平台、安全分析工具以及安全資訊和事件管理 (SIEM) 系統來提高威脅偵測、事件回應和取證能力。
關注零信任安全架構:
零信任安全概念的引入假設網路中可能已經存在潛在威脅,因此需要使用基於行為的異常檢測系統、存取控制和持續監控。透過實施使用零信任原則的 APT 保護解決方案,組織可以實施嚴格的安全措施並降低威脅行為者未經授權的存取和橫向移動的風險。
整合人工智慧與機器學習:
為了改善威脅偵測、自動化事件回應並提高安全策略的有效性,反 APT 公司正在利用 AI 和 ML 技術。由人工智慧驅動的反 APT 系統在分析大量數據、發現趨勢和發現指向 APT 的異常方面變得更加準確和高效。
夥伴關係與協作:
政府機構、產業協會、網路安全供應商和威脅情報提供者之間的合作促進了知識交流、威脅情報共享和針對高級持續性威脅的協作防禦。透過合作,企業將能夠:
限制全球 APT 對策市場的因素
有幾個因素可能會對 APT 攻擊防護市場造成限制和課題。這些包括:
成本限制:
部署全面的 APT 對策解決方案通常需要大量資金來購買、安裝、維護和支援該技術。預算限制可能會阻止許多組織,尤其是中小型企業 (SME),投資先進的 APT 安全服務和技術。
整合與部署的複雜性:
網路安全設備、端點保護平台、SIEM 系統和威脅情報來源只是 APT 預防解決方案通常必須與之互動的網路安全基礎設施中的一部分。組織,尤其是擁有多樣化 IT 基礎架構的組織,在整合不同的安全系統和確保互通性方面會面臨課題。
人才缺口與技能短缺:
成功打擊 APT 的主要障礙之一是缺乏合格的網路安全專業人員和經驗豐富的威脅獵人。企業可能會發現很難開發和留住具有威脅偵測、事件回應、數位取證和安全分析經驗的網路安全團隊,尤其是在對網路安全人才的需求和競爭日益激烈的情況下。
誤報與警報疲勞:
安全營運團隊可能會因 APT 預防解決方案的安全警報和訊息而負擔過重,導致警報疲勞。誤報是指將良性行為錯誤地報告為惡意行為,從而將注意力和資源從真正的威脅中轉移開,從而使問題更加嚴重。
監理合規負擔:
APT 安全解決方案的採用是由法規遵循要求驅動的,但合規性工作也給組織帶來了管理負擔、文件要求和審計審查。遵守 GDPR、HIPAA、PCI DSS 和行業特定法規等監管要求可能會佔用戰略網路安全活動的資源。
APT 技術與策略的演變:
網路犯罪分子不斷調整其攻擊方法和策略,以逃避傳統的安全措施並避免被發現。高階持續性威脅 (APT) 行為者不斷課題網路安全專業人員,他們採用加密、混淆和多態性等逃避技術來隱藏其惡意活動並逃避反 APT 系統。
地緣政治與地緣經濟因素:
由於地緣政治緊張、民族國家網路威脅和地緣政治動盪,在敏感產業和地區運作的組織可能更容易受到 APT 攻擊。地緣政治緊張局勢加劇可能導致針對關鍵基礎設施、政府機構和跨國公司的網路間諜、破壞和破壞性網路攻擊增加。
遺留基礎設施與技術債:
過時的軟體、遺留的安全解決方案和遺留的 IT 基礎設施包含固有的安全風險和漏洞,可能被 APT 參與者利用。對於許多組織來說,解決技術債和更新過時的系統以符合當前的網路安全最佳實踐是一項困難且耗費資源的課題。
Advanced Persistent Threat Protection Market size was valued at USD 14.23 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 42.70 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 17.25% during the forecast period 2024-2030.
Global Advanced Persistent Threat Protection Market Drivers
The market drivers for the Advanced Persistent Threat Protection Market can be influenced by various factors. Growing Intricacy of Cyberattacks: Organisations are more vulnerable to Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) that target their confidential information, intellectual property, and vital infrastructure. Strong APT defence solutions are becoming more and more necessary due to the increasing complexity and frequency of cyberattacks.
Growing Concerns and Awareness About Cybersecurity:
Notoriety-grabbing data leaks, ransomware assaults, and other cybersecurity mishaps have made enterprises realise how crucial it is to put in place strong APT defences. Investments in sophisticated threat detection and response capabilities are being driven by worries about data protection, regulatory compliance, and company continuity.
Growing Use of IoT Devices and Cloud Computing:
Organisations are more susceptible to Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) due to the increased use of cloud services, mobile devices, and Internet of Things (IoT) devices, which have increased the attack surface for cybercriminals. Securing cloud-based infrastructure, mobile endpoints, and IoT ecosystems becomes essential for reducing APT threats as firms adopt digital transformation projects.
Regulatory Compliance Requirements:
Organisations must protect sensitive data and prevent unauthorised access in order to comply with strict regulatory frameworks like the General Data Protection Regulation, the California Consumer Privacy Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, and the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS). Adoption of APT protection solutions to guard against data breaches and compliance violations is driven by regulatory compliance.
Requirement for Real-Time Threat Intelligence and Analytics:
In order to identify, evaluate, and react to APTs promptly, organisations need to have real-time insight into their IT environments. In order to improve threat detection, incident response, and forensic capabilities, there is a growing need for sophisticated threat intelligence platforms, security analytics tools, and security information and event management (SIEM) systems.
Emphasis on Zero Trust Security Architecture:
The implementation of Zero Trust security concepts, which posit that potential threats may already be present in the network, is necessitating the use of behavior-based anomaly detection systems, access controls, and continuous monitoring. Organisations can enforce stringent security measures and reduce the danger of unauthorised access and threat actors' lateral movement by implementing APT protection solutions that use Zero Trust principles.
Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning:
To improve threat detection, automate incident response, and increase the effectiveness of security policies, APT defence companies are utilising AI and ML technology. AI-driven APT protection systems are more accurate and efficient at analysing large volumes of data, finding trends, and spotting abnormalities that point to APTs.
Partnerships and Cooperation:
Cooperation across government agencies, industry associations, cybersecurity vendors, and threat intelligence providers promotes knowledge exchange, the sharing of threat intelligence, and cooperative defence against advanced persistent threats. Through partnerships, businesses can
Global Advanced Persistent Threat Protection Market Restraints
Several factors can act as restraints or challenges for the Advanced Persistent Threat Protection Market. These may include:
Cost Restrictions:
The implementation of comprehensive APT protection solutions frequently necessitates a large outlay of funds for the purchase, installation, upkeep, and support of technology. Budgetary restrictions may prevent many organisations, particularly small and medium-sized firms (SMEs), from investing in advanced APT security services and technology.
Complexity of Integration and Deployment:
Network security appliances, endpoint protection platforms, SIEM systems, and threat intelligence feeds are just a few examples of the cybersecurity infrastructure that APT protection solutions usually need to interact with. Organisations may face difficulties in integrating different security systems and guaranteeing interoperability, especially those with diverse IT infrastructures.
Talent Gap and Skills Shortage:
One major obstacle to successful APT prevention is the lack of qualified cybersecurity experts and seasoned threat hunters. Organisations may find it difficult to develop and retain a cybersecurity team with experience in threat detection, incident response, digital forensics, and security analytics, particularly in light of the growing demand and rivalry for cybersecurity talent.
False Positives and Alert Fatigue:
Security operations teams may become overloaded with security alerts and messages from APT protection solutions, which can result in alert fatigue. False positives, in which benign actions are mistakenly reported as malicious, exacerbate the issue by drawing attention and resources away from real threats.
Regulatory Compliance load:
Although the adoption of APT security solutions is driven by regulatory compliance requirements, compliance duties can also place a heavy administrative load, documentation requirements, and audit scrutiny on organisations. Resources may be taken away from strategic cybersecurity activities in order to comply with regulatory demands like GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and industry-specific legislation.
Evolution of APT Techniques and Tactics:
In order to get around conventional security measures and avoid discovery, cybercriminals are always changing their attack techniques and tactics. Cybersecurity professionals have a constant challenge as advanced persistent threat (APT) actors use evasion techniques like encryption, obfuscation, and polymorphism to hide their harmful actions and get beyond APT prevention systems.
Geopolitical and Geoeconomic Factors:
Organisations operating in sensitive industries or regions may be more vulnerable to APT attacks as a result of geopolitical tensions, state-sponsored cyberthreats, and geopolitical upheavals. Increased cyber espionage, sabotage, and disruptive cyberattacks that target vital infrastructure, governmental institutions, and multinational firms may result from heightened geopolitical tensions.
Legacy Infrastructure and Technology Debt:
Outdated software, legacy security solutions, and legacy IT infrastructure all have inherent security risks and vulnerabilities that can be taken advantage of by APT actors. For many organisations, addressing technology debt and updating outdated systems to comply with current cybersecurity best practices is a challenging and resource-intensive task.
The Global Advanced Persistent Threat Protection Market is Segmented on the basis of Solutions, Services, Deployment Modes, And Geography.