首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 能源/環境

CO2 降低

市場調查報告書

商品編碼

1654701

全球碳農業市場 - 2025 至 2032 年

Global Carbon Farming Market - 2025-2032

出版日期: 2025年02月13日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 201 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

2024 年全球碳農業市場規模達 1.1336 億美元，預計到 2032 年將達到 3,300.1 億美元，2025-2032 年預測期內的複合年成長率為 14.29%。

由於全球人口的成長和相應的食品消費的激增，碳農業市場變得越來越重要，這大大增加了與農業實踐相關的碳足跡。目前，農業產出約佔全球溫室氣體排放量的11%，其中畜牧業為主要來源。然而，農業有能力從問題的導致者轉變為解決方案的重要組成部分。

碳農業計畫強調利用永續的做法來捕獲碳，包括土壤管理、農林業和強化牲畜和作物系統。這個新興市場引起了農民、商業部門和政府的極大關注，凸顯了其在應對氣候變遷方面的重要性。

巴斯夫共同創立歐洲碳+農業聯盟，彰顯了以農民為中心的策略，加速向永續農業轉型。這些努力與包括歐盟綠色協議在內的整體碳中和目標相呼應。將碳封存納入農業框架是減少環境影響和促進糧食生產系統長期永續性的可行方法。

動力學

促進因素 1 – 監管架構與政府政策

世界各國政府正採取財政誘因、補貼和碳權等措施，鼓勵農民採用碳封存方法。澳洲減排基金（ERF）激勵農業者透過永續技術減少溫室氣體排放。將碳捕獲於土壤或植物中的措施可以產生碳權額，這些碳權額可以進行交易以獲取經濟收益。這導致了碳農業實踐的廣泛採用，特別是在農業領域，證明了永續農業的經濟可行性。

在歐洲，計劃於 2023 年 3 月 22 日實施的《綠色聲明指令》等監管進步增強了市場穩健性。該指令與歐洲綠色協議一致，旨在增強消費者對環境聲明的信心並鼓勵永續行為。強制要求在環境聲明中提供證據和透明度，迫使組織採用更永續和更負責任的方法，從而間接促進碳農業的進步。

這些支持性立法框架不僅建立了財政激勵機制，也增強了人們的意識和信心，推動碳農業作為應對氣候變遷和農業永續性的重要措施。

促進因素 2 – 碳補償需求

企業、政府實體和尋求實現碳中和或減少碳足跡的人們對於碳補償的需求日益增加。碳補償透過平衡無法直接消除的溫室氣體排放，已成為緩和氣候變遷的國際措施中的重要機制。這種需求受到多種變數的影響，例如企業永續發展目標、立法要求以及消費者對生態負責產品和服務的傾向。

人們對氣候變遷和監管限制的認知不斷增強，正在推動碳權市場的發展。這為農民提供了一個透過永續土地管理實踐封存碳來獲取收入的市場機會。許多公司承諾實現碳中和，並準備投資碳補償。這對從事碳農業的農民來說是一個巨大的市場機會。

約束：測量和驗證挑戰

碳農業旨在透過農業方法封存大氣中的二氧化碳並將其保留在土壤和植被中。然而，由於土壤碳動態的複雜性，受各種土壤類型、氣候條件和農業方法的影響，量化和驗證碳封存會遇到困難。

這種不可預測性阻礙了建立一致的評估方法，從而增加了費用和工作量。驗證方法的精確度、可擴展性和費用很大程度上影響碳農業計畫的有效性。高昂的費用和多變的標準可能會阻礙農民參與和買家投資碳權。

位於西雅圖的新創公司 Nori 就反映了這些問題。他們的市場將農民與碳補償購買者聯繫起來，但在準確評估碳去除方面遇到困難。由於土壤的多變性，Nori 在土壤採樣和建模方面面臨挑戰。與科學專家的合作增強了他們的方法；但儘管如此，這個過程依然昂貴且耗時。區塊鏈技術等創新提高了透明度，而 Nori 對標準化標準的倡導則強調了全行業統一的必要性，以減少複雜性並增強對碳農業計劃的信任。

The carbon farming market is becoming more important due to the growing global population and a corresponding surge in food consumption, which has significantly increased the carbon footprint associated with agricultural practices. Agricultural output presently accounts for roughly 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with the livestock industry as the predominant source. Nevertheless, agriculture possesses the capacity to shift from contributing to the issue to serving as a crucial component of the solution.

Carbon farming programs emphasize the utilization of sustainable practices, including soil management, agroforestry and enhanced livestock and crop systems, to trap carbon. This nascent market has attracted significant attention from farmers, the commercial sector and governments, highlighting its importance in addressing climate change.

BASF's co-founding of the European Carbon+ Farming Coalition highlights a farmer-centric strategy to expedite the shift towards sustainable agriculture. These efforts correspond with overarching carbon neutrality objectives, including the European Union's Green Deal. Integrating carbon sequestration into agricultural frameworks offers a viable approach to reduce environmental impacts and promote long-term sustainability in food production systems.

Dynamics

Driver 1 - Regulatory frameworks and government policies

Governments worldwide are enacting measures including financial incentives, subsidies and carbon credits to encourage farmers to use carbon sequestration practices. Australia's Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF) incentivizes agriculturalists to diminish greenhouse gas emissions via sustainable techniques. Initiatives that trap carbon in soil or plants can generate carbon credits, which are tradable for financial gain. This has resulted in substantial adoption of carbon farming practices, especially in the agriculture sector, demonstrating the economic feasibility of sustainable farming.

In Europe, regulation advancements like the Green Claims Directive, planned on March 22, 2023, enhance market robustness. The directive is consistent with the European Green Deal, seeking to bolster consumer confidence in environmental assertions and encourage sustainable behavior. Mandating proof and transparency in environmental claims compels organizations to adopt more sustainable and accountable methods, hence indirectly promoting the advancement of carbon farming.

These supportive legislative frameworks not only establish financial incentives but also augment awareness and confidence, promoting carbon farming as an essential response to climate change and agricultural sustainability.

Driver 2 - Carbon offsetting demand

Increasing demand for carbon offsets from corporations, governmental entities and people seeking to attain carbon neutrality or diminish their carbon footprint. Carbon offsets have emerged as an essential mechanism in international initiatives to alleviate climate change by counterbalancing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that cannot be directly eliminated. This demand is influenced by multiple variables, such as corporate sustainability objectives, legislative mandates and consumer inclinations towards ecologically responsible products and services.

The growing awareness of climate change and regulatory restrictions are propelling the market for carbon credits. This presents a market opportunity for farmers to gain income by sequestering carbon via sustainable land management practices. Numerous corporations are pledging to achieve carbon neutrality and are prepared to invest in carbon offsets. This represents a substantial market opportunity for farmers engaged in carbon farming efforts.

Restraint: Measurement and verification challenges

Carbon farming seeks to sequester atmospheric CO2 and retain it in soil and vegetation via agricultural methods. Nonetheless, quantifying and validating carbon sequestration encounters difficulties owing to the intricacies of soil carbon dynamics, which are affected by various soil types, climatic conditions and agricultural methods.

This unpredictability hinders the establishment of consistent assessment methodologies, hence escalating expenses and efforts. The precision, scalability and expense of verification methods strongly influence the efficacy of carbon farming initiatives. Elevated expenses and variable criteria may deter farmers from engaging and buyers from investing in carbon credits.

Nori, a startup located in Seattle, illustrates these problems. Their marketplace links farmers with carbon offset purchasers but encounters difficulties in precisely assessing carbon removal. Nori faced challenges in soil sampling and modeling because of soil variability. Engaging with scientific specialists enhanced their approaches; nonetheless, the process was expensive and time-consuming. Innovations like as blockchain technology improved transparency, while Nori's advocacy for standardized standards underscored the necessity for industry-wide uniformity to diminish complexity and foster trust in carbon farming initiatives.

Segment Analysis

The global carbon farming market is segmented based on project type, practice type, end-user and region.

Silvopasture works as catalyst for carbon sequestration and agricultural sustainability

Silvopasture, an integrated agroforestry approach that amalgamates trees, fodder plants and cattle on the same plot of land, is increasingly recognized for its capacity to absorb carbon, augment soil health and elevate farm output. This method is notably important in the carbon farming sector, providing a comprehensive strategy for climate mitigation and agricultural sustainability.

Research demonstrates that silvopasture systems can store between 1.1 and 4.2 tons of CO2 per hectare each year, contingent upon tree species, climate and management approaches, rendering it a compelling choice for farmers aiming to produce carbon credits.

In the southeastern US, where conventional cattle ranching has encountered soil degradation, water scarcity and diminishing profitability, silvopasture has arisen as a sustainable alternative. Farmers have effectively cultivated fast-growing tree species, such as loblolly pine, in conjunction with grazing grasses and cattle, maximizing both environmental and economic advantages.

Integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS) are anticipated to experience substantial expansion in the carbon farming sector. These systems integrate plant and animal elements to improve agroecosystem resilience and tackle global food security issues. ICLS can enhance agricultural output, improve nutritional results and promote environmental sustainability, particularly for rural and low-income households, providing enduring advantages for food and nutritional security.

Geographical Penetration

Ambitious climate goals and supportive policies in Europe

The carbon farming industry in Europe is swiftly growing, propelled by the EU's ambitious climate objectives and favorable legislation. Due to heightened awareness and incentives, the market is poised for substantial growth in the forthcoming years. The European Union has implemented various initiatives to promote carbon farming, including the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), Horizon Europe and the LIFE program. These initiatives offer financial incentives and technical assistance to farmers and land managers for the adoption of carbon farming practices.

In April 2024, the European Parliament ratified the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulation, creating the inaugural EU-wide voluntary framework for certifying carbon removals, carbon farming and carbon storage in products throughout Europe. The CRCF Regulation will promote investment in novel carbon removal technologies and sustainable carbon farming solutions by establishing EU quality criteria and monitoring and reporting methods, while simultaneously addressing greenwashing.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Vayda, Terramera Inc, Indigo Ag, Nori, Soil Capital, Agoro Carbon Alliance, Carbon Sequestration Inc., Regen Network, Agreena and Rabo Carbon Bank.

By Project Type

Agroforestry
Biochar
Silvopasture
Soil Carbon Sequestration
Afforestation/ Reforestation

By Practice Type

Conservation Tillage
Cover Cropping
Crop Rotation
Integrated Crop-livestock Systems

By End-user

Farmers & Ranchers
Corporations
Government Agencies
Non-profit Organizations

By Region

North America
South America
Europe
Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

In June 2024, Nori introduces an unprecedented quantity of soil carbon removal credits to the marketplace from the Bayer Carbon Program in U.S. Nori announced the release of more than 125,000 regeneration tonnes from the Bayer Carbon Program in U.S. marketplace, representing the greatest single issuance of credits in the company's history. The credits signify an unparalleled augmentation of Nori's carbon removal supply and contribute substantially to the soil organic carbon sector.
In April 2024, Nori collaborates with Perennial to enhance its carbon credit issuance program and enable new functionalities. Nori, a prominent issuer, registry and market for carbon removal credits, has selected Perennial, a firm specializing in soil carbon standards, tools and technology, to facilitate the development and growth of its soil organic carbon credit issuance program.

Why Purchase the Report?

To visualize the global carbon farming market segmentation based on project type, practice type, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
Excel data sheet with numerous data points of the carbon farming market with all segments.
PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global carbon farming market report would provide approximately 62 tables, 56 figures and 201 pages.

Target Audience 2025

Manufacturers/ Buyers
Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
Research Professionals
Emerging Companies

1. Methodology and Scope

1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Snippet by Project Type
3.2. Snippet by Practice Type
3.3. Snippet by End-user
3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

4.1. Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1. Drivers
  - 4.1.1.1. Regulatory frameworks and government policies
  - 4.1.1.2. Carbon offsetting demand
- 4.1.2. Restraints
  - 4.1.2.1. Measurement and verification challenges
- 4.1.3. Opportunity
- 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
5.3. Pricing Analysis
5.4. Regulatory Analysis
5.5. DMI Opinion

6. By Project Type

6.1. Introduction
- 6.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 6.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Project Type
6.2. Agroforestry*
- 6.2.1. Introduction
- 6.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
6.3. Biochar
6.4. Silvopasture
6.5. Soil Carbon Sequestration
6.6. Afforestation/ Reforestation

7. By Practice Type

7.1. Introduction
- 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Practice Type
7.2. Conservation Tillage*
- 7.2.1. Introduction
- 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3. Cover Cropping
7.4. Crop Rotation
7.5. Integrated Crop-livestock Systems

8. By End-user

8.1. Introduction
- 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
- 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-user
8.2. Farmers & Ranchers*
- 8.2.1. Introduction
- 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3. Corporations
8.4. Government Agencies
8.5. Non-profit Organizations

9. By Region

9.1. Introduction
- 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
9.2. North America
- 9.2.1. Introduction
- 9.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 9.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 9.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
- 9.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.2.6.1. US
  - 9.2.6.2. Canada
  - 9.2.6.3. Mexico
9.3. Europe
- 9.3.1. Introduction
- 9.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 9.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 9.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
- 9.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.3.6.1. Germany
  - 9.3.6.2. UK
  - 9.3.6.3. France
  - 9.3.6.4. Italy
  - 9.3.6.5. Spain
  - 9.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
9.4. South America
- 9.4.1. Introduction
- 9.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 9.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 9.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
- 9.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.4.6.1. Brazil
  - 9.4.6.2. Argentina
  - 9.4.6.3. Rest of South America
9.5. Asia-Pacific
- 9.5.1. Introduction
- 9.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 9.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 9.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
- 9.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.5.6.1. China
  - 9.5.6.2. India
  - 9.5.6.3. Japan
  - 9.5.6.4. Australia
  - 9.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
9.6. Middle East and Africa
- 9.6.1. Introduction
- 9.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Project Type
- 9.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Practice Type
- 9.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user

10. Competitive Landscape

10.1. Competitive Scenario
10.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
10.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

11. Company Profiles

11.1. Vayda*
- 11.1.1. Company Overview
- 11.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
- 11.1.3. Financial Overview
- 11.1.4. Key Developments
11.2. Terramera Inc
11.3. Indigo Ag
11.4. Nori
11.5. Soil Capital
11.6. Agoro Carbon Alliance
11.7. Carbon Sequestration Inc.
11.8. Regen Network
11.9. Agreena
11.10. Rabo Carbon Bank

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE