封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1631572

多式聯運:市場佔有率分析、產業趨勢/統計、成長預測(2025-2030)

Intermodal Freight Transportation - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2025 - 2030)

出版日期: | 出版商: Mordor Intelligence | 英文 120 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3個工作天內

價格

本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

預計多式聯運市場在預測期間內複合年成長率為8.27%

多式聯運貨運-市場-IMG1

主要亮點

  • 根據供應鏈管理專業委員會的物流狀況報告,運輸成本佔總物流成本的66%。由於司機短缺和抑制生產力的貨運法規等貨運問題限制了未來幾年的運力,主動管理運輸網路可以防止這些成本上升。如果企業希望減少供應鏈中斷、管理供應風險並降低運輸成本,多式聯運可能是可行的選擇。將多式聯運納入運輸組合中可以顯著節省成本。將多種運輸方式納入運輸公司的基礎設施中可以減少對單一運力來源的依賴。使用多式聯運的供應鏈領導者可以透過利用每種運輸方式的能力,在短期和長期內受益。
  • 此外,美國環保署 (EPA) 報告稱,與單獨使用卡車運輸相比,使用多式聯運進行超過 1,000 英里的運輸可減少多達 65% 的燃料使用和溫室氣體排放。一輛將 40,000 磅貨物從洛杉磯運送到波士頓的卡車排放約 4.35 噸二氧化碳。透過多式聯運鐵路運輸同樣 40,000 磅的貨物,產生的碳排放將顯著減少至 1.75 噸。多式聯運可以有效減少企業的碳排放。美國環保署估計,透過鐵路而不是高速公路運輸每噸英里的貨物可以減少三分之二的溫室氣體排放。這對於企業繼續努力減少碳排放以遵守環境法規並實現企業永續性目標至關重要。
  • 大型多式聯運鐵路設施受到重型卡車運輸的挑戰,卡車通常按照到達起重機的順序進行維修,這不是最理想的。按照貨櫃的堆疊順序將卡車召喚到起重機上,而不是按照先到先服務的方式將箱子轉移到服務卡車上,可以提高效率。這大大減少了交易卡車駕駛人聯繫終端的需要,並允許終端了解計費流程和事件。在卡車駕駛人到達門口之前檢查運單是否指定等項目可以藉助行動軟體應用程式進行管理。此功能可幫助駕駛員執行高級入住和退房、完成服務請求、驗證單位位置以及從行動電話接收停車位置更新。
  • 在Covid-19大流行期間,世界各國政府都限制非公民和非居住者入境,或對入境人員實施長時間隔離,包括鎖門、嚴格保持社交距離和人與人接觸,從而限制了傳播。追蹤措施的同時,對病毒進行追蹤。這些對跨國和過境貨運的過度限制,進一步加劇了疫情衝擊對全球經濟的經濟和社會影響。
  • 該市場正在進行多家公司的大規模併購,以擴大其影響力。去年6月,全球供應鏈、工業和零售生態系統協作SaaS軟體解決方案供應商非專利 Group宣布,透過非專利 TMS和GCR(非專利 Collaborative Replenishment)解決方案的SaaS實施,協助食品業的主要參與者利馬格蘭集團對其運輸和供應業務進行了轉型。

多式聯運市場趨勢

鐵路和道路運輸預計將佔據較大佔有率

  • 多式聯運以合理的成本提供可靠的貨運,並有可能融入當前的貨運基礎設施。美國鐵路業每人運輸貨物超過40噸,多式聯運往往採用53英尺長的貨櫃進行。據CSX稱,一趟聯運列車可運輸280卡車的貨物。在決定是否使用多式聯運時,托運人會考慮與精確規劃鐵路 (PSR) 相關的低效率、運輸設備可用性、裝載價格以及駕駛人等各種問題。
  • 隨著對更高效、更快捷的貨運需求的增加,鐵路業努力透過精準規劃鐵路來加強營運。 PSR是指在鐵路網規劃的直達線路上,用更少的車廂和機車運輸相同數量的貨物。傳統列車滿載時才載貨,但有了PSR,無論是否有貨物,列車都會在指定時間開始行駛。 PSR 的目標是實現更高的速度、更長的列車編組和更短的終點站停留時間。然而,隨著鐵路業向PSR過渡,現有運輸車道受到影響,設備和人員減少。
  • 美國和鄰國的鐵路營運商努力升級設備、運輸時間表、裝卸時間和車道數量,以適應大量的配送點。墨西哥擁有完善的鐵路基礎設施,覆蓋全國大部分地區,與美國邊境附近有完善的鐵路連接。加拿大有兩條主要鐵路:加拿大國家鐵路(CN)和加拿大太平洋鐵路(CPR)。
  • 科技和多式聯運鐵路正在幫助托運人應對運輸環境的挑戰。 CSX 運輸擁有超過 40 個航站樓的網路。多式聯運業務服務於密西西比河以東的主要市場,並透過大量貨櫃運輸產品,為公司提供運輸超過 500 英里的卡車式服務。 CSX CSX Transport 對運輸管理系統供應商進行了調查,以深入了解多式聯運鐵路運輸。多式聯運鐵路的重點是降低運能和成本。托運人可以透過添加運輸管理系統、開始向多式聯運過渡或兩全其美來實現其目標。

北美預計將佔據很大佔有率

  • 北美地區的多式聯運貨運市場越來越依賴消費經濟的需求。區域鐵路產業致力於創造可與地面運輸相媲美的新型多式聯運服務。去年二月,Mullen Group Ltd. 宣布其完全子公司APPS Cartage Inc. 和 APPS Cargo Terminals Inc. 已與 CN 簽訂協議,在指定期限內繼續向 APPS Transport 提供多式聯運服務。
  • 根據IANA預測,2022年多式聯運總量為17,716,445輛,較2021年下降3.9%。儘管拖車數量減少23.8%至924,259輛,但國內貨櫃吞吐量增加1.6%至8,147,044輛。國內設備整體銷售量下降1.8%至9,071,303台。

該地區也有一些值得注意的新參與企業。例如,去年 11 月,連接汽車托運人和承運人的數位平台 RunBuggy OMI Inc. 宣布推出其順風車運輸管理解決方案 (TMS)。這種雲端基礎的解決方案使車輛托運人能夠透過合作夥伴或自己的方式無縫整合和連接他們當前的運輸資產,並與 RunBuggy 的市場(一個由 17,000 名檢驗的司機組成的全國網路)連接,以擴展您的運輸能力。

多式聯運產業概況

多式聯運市場適度分散,進入市場的公司提供與支援多式聯運方式相關的各種軟體和服務。此外,收購多年來一直是主要的市場趨勢。主要參與者包括 Oracle Corporation、Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.、HighJump (Korber AG) 和 Blue Yonder Group, Inc.。

2022 年 4 月,為了進一步多元化,Lietuvos Gelezinkeliai (LTG) 的貨運部門 LTG Cargo 推出了前往德國杜伊斯堡的多式聯運服務。客戶將可以透過鐵路到達歐洲最重要的工業叢集之一的內河港口。

其他好處

  • Excel 格式的市場預測 (ME) 表
  • 3 個月的分析師支持

目錄

第1章簡介

  • 研究假設和市場定義
  • 調查範圍

第2章調查方法

第3章執行摘要

第4章市場洞察

  • 市場概況
  • 產業吸引力-波特五力分析
    • 新進入者的威脅
    • 買家/消費者的議價能力
    • 供應商的議價能力
    • 替代品的威脅
    • 競爭公司之間敵對關係的強度
  • COVID-19 造成的影響評估

第5章市場動態

  • 市場促進因素
    • 全球供應鏈對有效且具成本效益的運輸的需求日益成長
    • 減少碳足跡的意識不斷增強
  • 市場挑戰
    • 由於缺乏有效的規劃和溝通,運輸成本增加

第6章 市場細分

  • 按成分
    • 軟體
    • 服務
  • 按運輸方式
    • 鐵路/道路運輸
    • 空運/道路運輸
    • 海運/道路運輸
    • 其他交通工具
  • 最終用戶產業
    • 工業/製造
    • 石油和天然氣
    • 消費品/零售
    • 飲食
    • 建設業
    • 其他最終用戶產業
  • 地區
    • 北美洲
    • 歐洲
    • 亞太地區
    • 拉丁美洲
    • 中東/非洲

第7章 競爭格局

  • 公司簡介
    • Oracle Corporation
    • Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp
    • HighJump(Korber AG)
    • Blue Yonder Group, Inc.(JDA Software)
    • Transplace, Inc.
    • GE Transportation(Wabtec Corporation)
    • The Descartes Systems Group Inc.(Descartes Aljex)
    • Motorola Solutions, Inc.
    • Elemica, Inc.(Eyefreight BV)
    • Envase Technologies

第8章投資分析

第9章市場的未來

簡介目錄
Product Code: 71642

The Intermodal Freight Transportation Market is expected to register a CAGR of 8.27% during the forecast period.

Intermodal Freight Transportation - Market - IMG1

Key Highlights

  • Transportation accounts for 66% of overall logistics expenses, according to the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' State of Logistics Report. Management of the transportation network proactively may prevent these costs from rising as trucking issues such as driver shortages and productivity-stifling trucking rules limit capacity in the coming years. Intermodal may be a strong option if the company wants to reduce supply chain interruption, manage supply risk, and lower transportation expenses. Including multimodal transportation in the transportation mix results in significant cost reductions. By incorporating several means of transportation into the carrier base, the reliance on a single source of capacity is reduced. Supply chain leaders that use multimodal freight moves may gain in the short and long term by utilizing the capabilities of each mode of transportation.
  • Moreover, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports that using intermodal transport for shipments over 1,000 miles can cut fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 65% relative to truck transport alone. A truck that can transport 40,000 lbs from Los Angeles to Boston produces approximately 4.35 tons of carbon emissions. The same 40,000 pounds, which could be shipped via intermodal rail, produces 1.75 tons of carbon emissions, significantly less. Intermodal transportation can effectively help reduce a company's carbon footprint. The EPA estimates that every ton-mile of freight moved by rail instead of highway can reduce greenhouse emissions by two-thirds. This is essential as companies continually work to reduce their carbon footprint to comply with environmental regulations and meet their corporate sustainability goals.
  • Extensive intermodal rail facilities are challenged by high truck volume and often serve the trucks in the order they arrive at a crane, which is not optimal. Efficiencies can be gained by calling the trucks to the crane to match the containers' stacking order rather than shuffling boxes to serve the trucks on a first-come, first-served basis. This makes the trucker with transactions significantly reduce the need to contact the terminal, helping terminals capture billable processes and events. Items such as checking whether a waybill is in place well before a trucker's arrival at the gate could be managed with the help of a mobile software application. This capability could help drivers perform advanced check-in and check-out, complete service requests, confirm unit locations, and receive parking location updates from a mobile phone.
  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, the government globally restricted its borders to non-citizens and non-residents or imposed on those entering extended periods of self-isolation to limit the spread of the virus while implementing lockdowns, strict social distancing, and contact tracing measures. These often-excessive restrictions to cross-border and transit freight transport further aggravated the economic and social impacts of the pandemic shock on the global economy.
  • The market is witnessing significant mergers and acquisitions by multiple companies to increase its presence. In June last year, Generix Group, a global provider of collaborative SaaS Software solutions for the Supply Chain, industrial, and retail ecosystems, assisted Jacquet Brossard, a Limagrain Group company and a major player in the food industry, in the transformation of its transport and supply operations through the SaaS implementation of Generix TMS and GCR (Generix Collaborative Replenishment) solutions.

Intermodal Freight Transportation Market Trends

Rail and Road Transport is Expected to Hold Significant Share

  • Intermodal transportation offers dependable freight shipment at a reasonable cost and might be incorporated into the current freight transportation infrastructure. The rail industry in the United States transports over 40 tons of freight per capita, and intermodal shipments are often made in 53-foot-long containers. According to CSX, one intermodal train can transport the same amount of freight as 280 trucks. Shippers examine various issues when deciding whether to use intermodal transportation, including the inefficiencies associated with railroad conversions to precision planned railroading (PSR), the availability of shipping equipment, load price, and the ongoing truck driver shortage.
  • While the demand for more efficient and rapid goods shipping has risen, the rail industry has strived to enhance operations using precision-planned railroading. PSR refers to transporting the same amount of freight with fewer railcars and locomotives along a planned direct line over a rail network. Conventional trains move freight when full, but under PSR, trains start moving at a specified time regardless of whether or not the freight is there. PSR aims to enable faster speeds, longer trains, and shorter terminal dwell times. However, as the rail industry has moved to PSR, it has impacted existing shipping lanes and decreased equipment and staff.
  • Railway operators in the United States and neighboring countries have strived to enhance equipment, shipping schedules, loading and unloading times, and the number of lanes to handle numerous delivery locations. The intermodal rail system in the United States stretches across the country, connecting every major port and providing some coast-to-coast service faster than the truck.Mexico has an outstanding rail infrastructure covering most of the country, with well-established rail connections near the US border. Canada has two main coast-to-coast railroads: the Canadian National Railway (CN) and the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR).
  • Technology and intermodal rail support shippers in meeting the transportation environment's difficulties. CSX Transportation has a network of more than 40 terminals. The intermodal business serves major markets east of the Mississippi and the transportation of products in numerous containers, providing corporations with service similar to trucking for shipments traveling more than 500 miles. CSX CSX Transportation surveyed transportation management system suppliers to get insight into intermodal rail transportation. Intermodal railways are more concerned with capacity and cost reductions. Adding a transportation management system, starting a multimodal conversion path, or ensuring the best use of both can help shippers achieve their goals.

North America is Expected to Hold Significant Share

  • The intermodal freight transportation market in the North American region is increasingly dependent on the consumer economy's demand. The regional rail industry is concentrating on creating new intermodal services that can successfully rival over-the-road options. In February last year, Mullen Group Ltd. announced that its wholly owned subsidiaries, APPS Cartage Inc. and APPS Cargo Terminals Inc., had signed an agreement with CN to continue supplying intermodal services to APPS Transport for a period of time.
  • According to IANA, overall intermodal volume will be 17.716,445 in 2022, a 3.9% decrease from 2021.Trailers dropped by 23.8% to 924,259, while domestic container volume increased by 1.6% to 8,147,044 units. Domestic equipment as a whole declined by 1.8% to 9,071,303.

The region is also witnessing significant new players entering the market. For instance, in November last year, RunBuggy OMI Inc., a digital platform that connects car shippers and transporters, announced the availability of its Hitch Transportation Management Solution (TMS). The cloud-based solution enables car shippers to seamlessly integrate and connect with their current transportation assets, whether through partners or in-house, and expand their transportation capacity with access to RunBuggy's Marketplace, a nationwide network of 17,000 verified drivers.

Intermodal Freight Transportation Industry Overview

The intermodal freight transportation market is moderately fragmented, as a few players are entering the market to provide various software and services related to supporting intermodal transportation methods. Moreover, acquisitions have been a key trend in the market over the years. Some of the key players include Oracle Corporation, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., HighJump (Korber AG), Blue Yonder Group, Inc. (JDA Software), etc.

In April 2022, to further diversify, LTG Cargo, the freight division of the Lietuvos Gelezinkeliai (LTG) company, introduced intermodal freight services to Duisburg, Germany. Customers will have rail access to one of Europe's most vital industrial clusters and the inland waterway port.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET INSIGHTS

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Industry Attractiveness - Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.2.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.2.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
    • 4.2.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.2.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.2.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.3 Assessment on the impact due to COVID-19

5 MARKET DYNAMICS

  • 5.1 Market Drivers
    • 5.1.1 Increasing need for effective and cost-efficient means of transportation by global supply chains
    • 5.1.2 Rising awareness regarding the reduction of carbon footprint
  • 5.2 Market Challanges
    • 5.2.1 Lack of effective effective planning and communication can increase transportation costs

6 MARKET SEGMENTATION

  • 6.1 By Component
    • 6.1.1 Software
    • 6.1.2 Service
  • 6.2 By Transportation Mode
    • 6.2.1 Rail and Road Transport
    • 6.2.2 Air and Road Transport
    • 6.2.3 Maritime and Road Transport
    • 6.2.4 Other Transportation Modes
  • 6.3 End-User Industry
    • 6.3.1 Industrial and Manufacturing
    • 6.3.2 Oil and Gas
    • 6.3.3 Consumer and Retail
    • 6.3.4 Food & Beverage
    • 6.3.5 Construction
    • 6.3.6 Other End-User Industries
  • 6.4 Geography
    • 6.4.1 North America
    • 6.4.2 Europe
    • 6.4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 6.4.4 Latin America
    • 6.4.5 Middle East and Africa

7 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 7.1 Company Profiles
    • 7.1.1 Oracle Corporation
    • 7.1.2 Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp
    • 7.1.3 HighJump (Korber AG)
    • 7.1.4 Blue Yonder Group, Inc. (JDA Software)
    • 7.1.5 Transplace, Inc.
    • 7.1.6 GE Transportation (Wabtec Corporation)
    • 7.1.7 The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (Descartes Aljex)
    • 7.1.8 Motorola Solutions, Inc.
    • 7.1.9 Elemica, Inc. (Eyefreight BV)
    • 7.1.10 Envase Technologies

8 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS

9 FUTURE OF THE MARKET