查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1613809

中國的獨立型OEM的ADAS與自動駕駛(2024年)

Chinese Independent OEMs' ADAS and Autonomous Driving Report, 2024
出版日期: | 出版商: ResearchInChina | 英文 345 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格
簡介目錄

近年來，中國智慧駕駛市場競爭日益激烈，駕駛/停車整合、高速公路NOA、城市NOA、無圖NOA等技術不斷湧現。中小型 ADAS Tier 1 越來越無法跟上科技發展的腳步。

2024年後，中國ADAS和自動駕駛市場將進入端到端競爭。端到端的自動駕駛將要求主機廠改變傳統的研發模式，投入大量的研發、運算能力和資料資源。然而，多品牌、多技術的路線讓整車廠難以集中資源贏得智慧駕駛之戰。組織架構調整、團隊整合將成為2024年國內主機廠的必修課。

為了參與智慧駕駛競爭，整車廠不斷調整組織架構、整合團隊。

蔚來不斷動態調整組織架構，以適應不同的發展階段。 2024年6月，蔚來將智慧駕駛團隊的組織架構從原來的感知-規劃-控制-執行調整為端到端的自動駕駛。蔚來智慧駕駛研發部由基礎模型部（負責端到端模型研發）、部署架構與解決方案部（負責整車相關演算法開發、架構設計、功能提供）組成、時空資訊成立新部門（負責雲端車輛、地圖資訊相關的演算法/模型開發及服務），撤銷先前的感知部、規劃控制部、環境資訊部、解決方案交付部。

2024年小鵬汽車也對技術開發部門進行了調整。小鵬汽車技術開發部門負責感知、規劃、控制、定位演算法的研發。調整後，技術開發部門分為AI端到端、AI應用、AI能源效率三個部門。

2024年8月左右，小米汽車智慧駕駛團隊也完成了新的組織架構調整，主要整合了 "感知" 與 "規劃與控制" 兩個子部門，並重組為 "兩端演算法與功能" 部門" 。

不僅新興整車廠不斷調整組織架構，老牌整車廠也在快速變革。

2024年6月，比亞迪成立天選開發部，在內部開發智慧駕駛。這使我們能夠自行開發高水準的智慧駕駛解決方案。比亞迪還成立了天朗開發部，開發低階智慧駕駛解決方案。 2024年下半年，比亞迪將深度整合組織架構。原天選團隊的核心成員被納入天朗自己的開發團隊。

2025年，D2D將成為OEM競爭的焦點。

繼今年8月華為搭載車位到車位智慧駕駛之後，理想汽車、小鵬汽車、小米等也將配備車位到車位的高水準智慧駕駛。

小鵬汽車表示，基於小鵬圖靈AI智慧駕駛系統，利用一系列智慧駕駛軟體和端到端基礎模型，成為一家可以實現車位到車位功能的公司。該方案採用一套軟體邏輯來連結地下停車場、大門、城市道路等場景。它還減輕了地圖和雷達的負擔，讓您無意識地產生路線。小鵬汽車在廣州車展宣布首次全網測試，並計畫未來以AI天機5.5.0全面推進。

在這份報告中，我們對中國汽車產業進行了研究和分析，並提供了中國獨立整車廠ADAS安裝數量以及各品牌趨勢等數據。

目錄

第1章 中國的獨立型品牌OEM的ADAS市場現狀

  • 自主品牌與合資品牌ADAS搭載數量及比例：分級別
  • 自主品牌ADAS安裝數量及比例：依功能分類
  • 自主品牌L2/L2+ ADAS安裝數量及率
  • 安裝的 L2/2.5/2.9 ADAS 數量：依品牌
  • 安裝的 L2/2.5/2.9 ADAS 數量：依型號
  • 安裝的 L2/L2+/2.5/2.9 ADAS 數量：依價格範圍
  • L2/L2+/2.5/2.9 ADAS 安裝率：依價格範圍劃分
  • 安裝的 L2.5/L2.9 ADAS 數量：按價格範圍和型號劃分（2023 年）
  • 安裝的 L2.5/L2.9 ADAS 數量：按價格範圍和型號劃分（2024 年 1 月至 8 月）
  • L2.5/L2.9 ADAS 安裝數量及安裝率：以價格
  • L2、L2.5 和 L2.9 ADAS 解決方案比較

第2章 中國的獨立型品牌OEM的ADAS/自動駕駛的設計和趨勢

  • ADAS/AD 安裝計畫和供應鏈
  • 自動駕駛產業老牌品牌的趨勢
  • 老牌品牌的自動駕駛技術趨勢
  • 智慧駕駛新興品牌發展趨勢

第3章 中國的老舖子獨立型品牌OEM的ADAS/自動駕駛設計

  • Changan
  • Great Wall Motor
  • BYD
  • FAW Hongqi
  • Geely
  • GAC
  • BAIC
  • SAIC
  • Chery
  • Dongfeng

第4章 中國的獨立型新興品牌OEM的ADAS/自動駕駛

  • NIO
  • Xpen Motors
  • Li Auto
  • Neta Auto
  • Leapmotor
  • Xiaomi Auto
  • HIMA (Harmony lntelligent Mobility Alliance)
簡介目錄
Product Code: DTT004

OEM ADAS research: adjust structure, integrate teams, and compete in D2D, all for a leadership in intelligent driving

In recent years, China's intelligent driving market has experienced escalating technological competition in driving-parking integration, highway NOA, urban NOA, and map-free NOA. Small and medium-sized ADAS Tier1s are gradually slow to keep up with the pace of technological evolution.

Since 2024, China's ADAS and autonomous driving markets have entered an end-to-end competition. End-to-end autonomous driving requires OEMs to change their previous R&D model and invest a lot of R&D, computing power and data resources. However, multi-brand and multi-technology routes make it difficult for OEMs to pool resources to win the battle of intelligent driving. Organizational structure adjustment and team integration have become compulsory courses for domestic OEMs in 2024.

To compete in intelligent driving, OEMs keep adjusting their structure and integrating their teams

NIO continues to dynamically adjust its organizational structure to adapt to different development stages. In June 2024, NIO adjusted the organizational structure of its intelligent driving team from original perception-planning & control-execution to end-to-end autonomous driving. NIO's Intelligent Driving R&D Department has newly established the Foundation Model Department (responsible for R&D of end-to-end models), Deployment Architecture and Solution Department (responsible for vehicle-related overall algorithm development, architecture design and function delivery), and Spatiotemporal Information Department (responsible for algorithm/model development and services related to the map information on vehicle and cloud), and canceled the original Perception Department, Planning & Control Department, Environmental Information Department and Solution Delivery Department.

Xpeng has also adjusted its technology development department in 2024. Its technology development department covers R&D of algorithms for perception, planning, control, and positioning. After the adjustment, the technology development department was split into three departments: AI End-to-End, AI Application, and AI Energy Efficiency.

Around August 2024, Xiaomi Auto's intelligent driving team also completed a new round of organizational structure adjustments, mainly combining the two secondary departments of "Perception" and "Planning & Control" and reorganizing them into the "End-to-End Algorithm and Function Department."

Not only are emerging OEMs constantly adjusting their organizational structures, but also traditional OEMs are making a rapid change.

In June 2024, BYD set up the Tianxuan Development Department for developing intelligent driving in house. It is positioned to self-develop high-level intelligent driving solutions. BYD also established the Tianlang Development Department, positioned to develop low-level intelligent driving solutions. In the second half of 2024, BYD deeply integrated its organizational structure. The core members of the original "Tianxuan" team have been incorporated into the "Tianlang" self-development team.

"Parking space to parking space" (D2D) will become the focus of competition among OEMs in 2025

Following Huawei that introduced parking space to parking space intelligent driving in August this year, Li Auto, Xpeng and Xiaomi among others will also implement high-level intelligent driving from parking space to parking space.

Xpeng Motors says: Based on the Xpeng Turing AI Intelligent Driving System, Xpeng has become a company that can enable the parking space to parking space function using a set of intelligent driving software and end-to-end foundation models. The solution adopts a set of software logics to connect scenarios such as underground garages, gates, and urban roads. It also lays less stress on maps and radars, and can generate routes unconsciously. Xpeng Motors announced the launch of the first full network test at the Auto Guangzhou, and will push it in full on AI Dimensity 5.5.0 in the future.

As well at the Auto Beijing, Fan Haoyu, Senior Vice President of Li Auto's Product Department, said that the parking space to parking space function based on end-to-end + VLM has been pushed to 10,000 beta test users, and test drive cars of outlets, across the country. In late November, all AD Max users can enjoy D2D supervised intelligent driving.

On November 16, Xiaomi Auto announced on its WeChat official account: the official name of its parking space to parking space function is All-scenario Intelligent Driving. This function enables parking space to parking space driving assistance as the user gets in the car. All-scenario Intelligent Driving will be installed in Xiaomi HAD (Hyper Autonomous Driving). In the future, Xiaomi SU7 Pro, Xiaomi SU7 Max, and Xiaomi SU7 Ultra models can all be upgraded with this function.

In November 2024, Zeekr released the Haohan Intelligent Driving 2.0, which will soon enable D2D intelligent driving. The D2D function launched by Zeekr has three core highlights: full-speed activation, all-gate access, and all-scenario intelligent parking not limiting parking spaces. It is the industry's first to realize automated parking without memorizing the road in advance, creating a caring parking space-to-parking space service for users. This function is expected to be pushed in batches in January 2025, and will be fully pushed nationwide to all Zeekr products equipped with Haohan Intelligent Driving 2.0 in Q2 2025.

How long can emerging OEMs self-developing intelligent driving maintain their lead?

Looking at OEMs' development course of intelligent driving in past few years, emerging OEMs are undoubtedly successful and have always been the leaders. However, Huawei, DJI, MOMENTA and other leading Tier1s do not lag behind. The state-of-the-art all-scenario parking space-to-parking space intelligent driving function in 2024 is first launched on BAIC STELATO S9.

Li Auto has made great progress in intelligent driving in 2024 by relying on its huge user base and rapid entry into end-to-end. Chinese OEMs such as BYD, Chery, SAIC, and Geely, with much more sales, are also expected to change the pattern in 2025 with the support of leading intelligent driving Tier1s.

In addition to traditional Chinese OEMs, there are also foreign OEMs. On November 14, at its 2024 Technology Innovation Day event, Mercedes-Benz introduced a new "map-free L2++ all-scenario high-level intelligent driving function based on vision-only solution". This high-level intelligent driving system adopts a vision-only solution and NVIDIA DRIVE Orin chip, does not rely on HD maps, uses end-to-end foundation models, and can achieve perception-decision integration. In the future, it will have point-to-point all-scenario intelligent driving capabilities (i.e. parking space to parking space intelligent driving capabilities) from pulling out of the starting parking space to pulling in the destination parking space.

This intelligent driving system of Mercedes-Benz was developed with the support of MOMENTA, a leading intelligent driving Tier1. As multinational OEMs such as Mercedes-Benz, Toyota, and Volkswagen learn to introduce Chinese intelligent supply chains, they also equip their cars with cutting-edge intelligent driving and cockpit functions. Market competition will become fiercer in 2025. A former leader may not always be the leader.

Table of Contents

1 Status Quo of Chinese Independent Brand OEMs' ADAS Market

  • 1.1 ADAS Installations and Installation Rate of Independent and Joint Venture Brands: by Level
  • 1.2 ADAS Installations and Installation Rate of Independent Brands: by Function
  • 1.3 L2/L2+ ADAS Installations and Installation Rate of Independent Brands
    • 1.3.1 L2/L2+ ADAS Installations: by Brand
    • 1.3.2 L2/L2+ ADAS Installation Rate: by Brand
  • 1.4 L2/2.5/2.9 ADAS Installations: by Brand
  • 1.5 L2/2.5/2.9 ADAS Installations: by Model
  • 1.6 L2/L2+/2.5/2.9 ADAS Installations: by Price Range
  • 1.7 L2/L2+/2.5/2.9 ADAS Installation Rate: by Price Range
  • 1.8 L2.5/L2.9 ADAS Installations: by Price Range + Model (2023)
  • 1.9 L2.5/L2.9 ADAS Installations: by Price Range + Model (Jan-Aug 2024)
  • 1.10 L2.5/L2.9 ADAS Installations and Installation Rate: by Price
  • 1.11 Comparison between L2, L2.5 and L2.9 ADAS Solutions

2 ADAS/Autonomous Driving Layout and Trends of Chinese Independent Brand OEMs

  • 2.1 ADAS/AD Implementation Plan and Supply Chain
    • 2.1.1 ADAS/AD Implementation Plan of Traditional Brands
    • 2.1.2 NOA and End-to-End Implementation Timetable of Main Sub-brands of Changan, GWM, BYD
    • 2.1.3 NOA and End-to-End Implementation Timetable of Main Sub-brands of FAW, Geely and GAC
    • 2.1.4 NOA and End-to-End Implementation Timetable of Main Sub-brands of BAIC, SAIC, Chery and Dongfeng
    • 2.1.5 ADAS Implementation Plan of Emerging Brands
    • 2.1.6 NOA and End-to-End Implementation Timetable of NIO, Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Xiaomi and Leapmotor
    • 2.1.7 ADAS Supply Chain of Traditional Brands
    • 2.1.8 ADAS Supply Chain of Emerging Brands
  • 2.2 Autonomous Driving Industry Trends of Traditional Brands
    • 2.2.1 Trend 1
    • 2.2.2 Trend 2
    • 2.2.3 Trend 3
    • 2.2.4 Trend 4
    • 2.2.5 Trend 5
    • 2.2.6 Trend 6
    • 2.2.7 Trend 7
    • 2.2.8 Trend 8
    • 2.2.9 Trend 9
    • 2.2.10 Trend 10
  • 2.3 Autonomous Driving Technology Trends of Traditional Brands
    • 2.3.1 Trend 1
    • 2.3.2 Trend 2
    • 2.3.3 Trend 3
    • 2.3.4 Trend 4
    • 2.3.5 Trend 5
  • 2.4 Intelligent Driving Development Trends of Emerging Brands
    • 2.4.1 Trend 1
    • 2.4.2 Trend 2
    • 2.4.3 Trend 3
    • 2.4.4 Trend 4
    • 2.4.5 Trend 5
    • 2.4.6 Trend 6

3 ADAS/Autonomous Driving Layout of Chinese Traditional Independent Brand OEMs

  • 3.1 Changan
    • 3.1.1 ADAS Strategic Planning
    • 3.1.2 ADAS Strategy
    • 3.1.3 123 Strategy - Business Model
    • 3.1.4 123 Strategy - Ark Architecture
    • 3.1.5 123 Strategy - SDA Architecture
    • 3.1.6 123 Strategy - SDA Architecture L5 Layer - Autonomous Driving
    • 3.1.7 123 Strategy - SDA Architecture L6 - Cloud Platform and Intelligent Computing Center
    • 3.1.8 ADAS Function Development History
    • 3.1.9 ADAS Development Roadmap
    • 3.1.10 Automatic Parking Development Roadmap
    • 3.1.11 Typical ADAS/AD Functions (1)
    • 3.1.12 Typical ADAS/AD Functions (2)
    • 3.1.13 Typical ADAS/AD Functions (3)
    • 3.1.14 Typical ADAS Models (4)
    • 3.1.15 L4 Autonomous Driving Test
    • 3.1.16 Investment and Cooperation in ADAS
  • 3.2 Great Wall Motor
    • 3.2.1 Overall ADAS Layout
    • 3.2.2 ADAS Strategy - Coffee Intelligence
    • 3.2.3 ADAS Strategy - Coffee Intelligent Driving
    • 3.2.4 Development History of ADAS
    • 3.2.5 ADAS System: HPilot
    • 3.2.6 ADAS System: HPilot 3.0
    • 3.2.7 NOH System
    • 3.2.8 Typical Models with ADAS System
    • 3.2.9 Haomo.ai Self-developed ADAS Technology Layout (1)
    • 3.2.10 Haomo.ai Self-developed ADAS Technology Layout (2)
    • 3.2.11 Haomo.ai Self-developed ADAS Technology Layout (3)
    • 3.2.12 Haomo.ai Self-developed ADAS Technology Layout (4)
    • 3.2.13 Haomo.ai Self-developed ADAS Technology Layout (5)
    • 3.2.14 Haomo.ai Self-developed ADAS Technology Layout (6)
    • 3.2.15 Intelligent Driving Highlights of the 2025 WEY Blue Mountain
    • 3.2.16 ADAS Development Dynamics
  • 3.3 BYD
    • 3.3.1 Development History of ADAS
    • 3.3.2 Overall ADAS Layout
    • 3.3.3 ADAS Responsible Team
    • 3.3.4 ADAS Roadmap
    • 3.3.5 ADAS System: DiPilot & DNP
    • 3.3.6 ADAS System: Eyes of God
    • 3.3.7 Models with Eyes of God
    • 3.3.8 ADAS Hardware Layout (1)
    • 3.3.9 ADAS Hardware Layout (2)
    • 3.3.10 ADAS Software Layout
    • 3.3.11 ADAS Technology Layout (1)
    • 3.3.12 ADAS Technology Layout (2)
    • 3.3.13 ADAS Algorithm Layout (3)
    • 3.3.14 ADAS Algorithm Layout (4)
    • 3.3.15 Autonomous Driving Test
    • 3.3.16 ADAS Cooperative Ecosystem Layout
  • 3.4 FAW Hongqi
    • 3.4.1 ADAS Development Roadmap
    • 3.4.2 Development Strategy
    • 3.4.3 R&D Layout
    • 3.4.4 Electronic and Electrical Architecture
    • 3.4.5 ADAS Technology Layout: Software
    • 3.4.6 Typical ADAS Models (1)
    • 3.4.7 Typical ADAS Models (2)
    • 3.4.8 ADAS Road Test: Demonstration Bases
    • 3.4.9 ADAS Road Test: Public Road
    • 3.4.10 Intelligent Driving Simulation Test
    • 3.4.11 Sinan Intelligent Driving
    • 3.4.12 ADAS Investment and Cooperation
  • 3.5 Geely
    • 3.5.1 Smart Geely 2025 Strategy
    • 3.5.2 Taizhou Declaration
    • 3.5.3 Integration of Intelligent Driving R&D System
    • 3.5.4 ADAS Self-development (1)
    • 3.5.5 ADAS Self-development (2)
    • 3.5.6 ADAS Technology Layout (1)
    • 3.5.7 ADAS Technology Layout (2)
    • 3.5.8 ADAS Technology Layout (3)
    • 3.5.9 ADAS Technology Layout (4)
    • 3.5.10 ADAS Technology Layout (5)
    • 3.5.11 ADAS Technology Layout (6)
    • 3.5.12 ADAS Technology Layout (7)
    • 3.5.13 ADAS Development Roadmap
    • 3.5.14 Autonomous Driving Test: Simulation Test
    • 3.5.15 Autonomous Driving Test: Closed Road Test
    • 3.5.16 Autonomous Driving Test: Public Road Test
    • 3.5.17 Commercial Vehicle Intelligent Driving Layout
    • 3.5.18 ADAS Partners
    • 3.5.19 ADAS Investment and Cooperation
  • 3.6 GAC
    • 3.6.1 ADAS Development Path
    • 3.6.2 1615 Strategy
    • 3.6.3 Intelligent Mobility 2027 Action Plan
    • 3.6.4 ADAS Responsible Team
    • 3.6.5 ADAS Technology Layout (1)
    • 3.6.6 ADAS Technology Layout (2)
    • 3.6.7 ADAS Technology Layout (3)
    • 3.6.8 ADAS Solution Evolution Roadmap
    • 3.6.9 ADAS System: ADiGO 2.0
    • 3.6.10 ADAS System: ADiGO 3.0 (1)
    • 3.6.11 ADAS System: ADiGO 3.0 (2)
    • 3.6.12 ADAS System: ADiGO 4.0 (1)
    • 3.6.13 ADAS System: ADiGO 4.0 (2)
    • 3.6.14 Aion Hyper Opened Urban NOA
    • 3.6.15 Intelligent Driving Highlights of the Second Generation AION V
    • 3.6.16 L4/L5 Autonomous Driving Layout
    • 3.6.17 L4/L5 Commercialization Progress
    • 3.6.18 Autonomous Driving Test: Test Field
    • 3.6.19 Autonomous Driving Test: Test License
    • 3.6.20 ADAS Investment and Cooperation
  • 3.7 BAIC
    • 3.7.1 Development History of Autonomous Driving
    • 3.7.2 ADAS Strategy: Dolphin+
    • 3.7.3 ADAS Technology Layout: Single-vehicle Intelligence
    • 3.7.4 ADAS Technology Layout: Combination of Single-vehicle Intelligence and Connectivity Technologies
    • 3.7.5 ADAS Roadmap
    • 3.7.6 Typical ADAS Models (1)
    • 3.7.7 Typical ADAS Models (2)
    • 3.7.8 Autonomous Driving Test
    • 3.7.9 Cooperation in Autonomous Driving
    • 3.7.10 Dynamic Layout of Autonomous Driving
  • 3.8 SAIC
    • 3.8.1 Development History of Intelligent Driving Self-developed Team
    • 3.8.2 Technology Layout: Hardware
    • 3.8.3 Technology Layout: Chip
    • 3.8.4 Technology Layout: Software
    • 3.8.5 Technology Layout: Algorithms & Foundation Model
    • 3.8.6 Technology Layout: HD Map
    • 3.8.7 ADAS Roadmap
    • 3.8.8 Advanced Intelligent Driving System of IM Motors
    • 3.8.9 Technology Advantages of IM AD
    • 3.8.10 Cooperation between IM Motors and Momenta in Intelligent Driving
    • 3.8.11 L4 Autonomous Driving Operation Platform
    • 3.8.12 Autonomous Driving Commercial Vehicle
    • 3.8.13 ADAS Partners
    • 3.8.14 ADAS Development Trends
  • 3.9 Chery
    • 3.9.1 Intelligent Strategy: LION
    • 3.9.2 Intelligent Strategy: 2025 Yaoguang Strategy
    • 3.9.3 2025 Yaoguang Strategy: Intelligent Driving
    • 3.9.4 Autonomous Driving Development History
    • 3.9.5 ADAS Self-developed Layout: ZDrive.ai
    • 3.9.6 Dual-Track Strategy of ZDrive.ai
    • 3.9.7 ADAS Cooperation Layout (1)
    • 3.9.8 ADAS Cooperation Layout (2)
    • 3.9.9 ADAS Cooperation Layout (3)
    • 3.9.10 ADAS Roadmap
    • 3.9.11 Typical ADAS Models
    • 3.9.12 ADAS Development Trends
  • 3.10 Dongfeng
    • 3.10.1 Strategy: "14th Five-Year Plan" Strategic Plan
    • 3.10.2 ADAS Technology Planning: Develop Commercial and Passenger Vehicles Simultaneously
    • 3.10.3 ADAS Technology Planning: "Two Series and One Platform" Technology Products
    • 3.10.4 ADAS Development Roadmap
    • 3.10.5 ADAS Layout (1)
    • 3.10.6 ADAS Layout (2)
    • 3.10.7 ADAS Layout (3)
    • 3.10.8 ADAS Layout (4)
    • 3.10.9 Autonomous Driving Cooperation Layout
    • 3.10.10 Dongfeng Autonomous Driving Partners

4 ADAS/Autonomous Driving of Chinese Independent Emerging Brand OEMs

  • 4.1 NIO
    • 4.1.1 Evolution of Autonomous Driving Functions
    • 4.1.2 Functions of the First-generation NIO Pilot
    • 4.1.3 Functions of the Second-generation NIO NAD
    • 4.1.4 Comparison of Hardware Configurations between NIO PILOT and NAD
    • 4.1.5 Introduction to NOP+
    • 4.1.6 NOP+ Was Officially Launched
    • 4.1.7 Comparison between NOP and NOP+
    • 4.1.8 Automated Parking Development Roadmap
    • 4.1.9 Autonomous Driving World Model
    • 4.1.10 Swarm Intelligence and Generative Simulation Help Data Closed Loop
    • 4.1.11 Upgrade of Autonomous Driving Architecture
    • 4.1.12 Reorganization of Intelligent Driving R&D Team
    • 4.1.13 Technology Layout: Autonomous Driving Chip R&D
    • 4.1.14 Technology Layout: LiDAR Chip
    • 4.1.15 Self-developed Intelligent Driving SoC: Shenji NX9031
    • 4.1.16 Technology Layout: Foundation Model and Intelligent Computing Center
    • 4.1.17 Autonomous Driving Cooperation Models and Trends
    • 4.1.18 Overseas Investments
    • 4.1.19 Major Suppliers of Autonomous Driving
    • 4.1.20 New Progress of Intelligent Driving
  • 4.2 Xpeng Motors
    • 4.2.1 Autonomous Driving Evolution
    • 4.2.2 Intelligent Driving System in the First Half: Upgrades and Iterations of Xpilot system
    • 4.2.3 Intelligent Driving System in the Second Half: XNGP (1)
    • 4.2.4 Intelligent Driving System in the Second Half: XNGP (2)
    • 4.2.5 Intelligent Driving System in the Second Half: XNGP (3)
    • 4.2.6 Hardware Composition of XNGP
    • 4.2.7 Software Capabilities of XNGP
    • 4.2.8 NGP Function Evolution
    • 4.2.9 VPA-L
    • 4.2.10 VPA Function Evolution
    • 4.2.11 End-to-End Foundation Model (1): Architecture
    • 4.2.12 End-to-End Foundation Model (2): AI+XNGP
    • 4.2.13 End-to-End Foundation Model (3): Organizational Change
    • 4.2.14 Technology Layout (1)
    • 4.2.15 Technology Layout (2)
    • 4.2.16 Technology Layout (3)
    • 4.2.17 Technology Layout (4)
    • 4.2.18 Autonomous Driving Hardware Configurations and Its Suppliers
    • 4.2.19 New Progress of Intelligent Driving
  • 4.3 Li Auto
    • 4.3.1 Intelligent Driving Platform Evolution Path
    • 4.3.2 Hardware Iteration and Suppliers in Intelligent Driving 1.0 Era
    • 4.3.3 AD System and Typical Models
    • 4.3.4 AD Max System and Typical Models
    • 4.3.5 AD Pro System
    • 4.3.6 Intelligent Driving 2.0 Era: From AD MAX 2.0 to AD MAX 3.0
    • 4.3.7 Intelligent Driving 2.0 Era: AD Max 3.0 Architecture
    • 4.3.8 Intelligent Driving 3.0 Era: End-to-End + VLM Dual System Architecture
    • 4.3.9 Typical ADAS Functions
    • 4.3.10 Automated Parking System Development Roadmap
    • 4.3.11 Smart Parking and Summoning
    • 4.3.12 Technology Layout: Chips
    • 4.3.13 Technology Layout: Data Closed Loop
    • 4.3.14 Intelligent Driving Algorithm: NPN
    • 4.3.15 Intelligent Driving Algorithm: TIN
    • 4.3.16 Intelligent Driving Algorithm: Occupancy Network Model
    • 4.3.17 Evolution of End-to-End Solution (1)
    • 4.3.18 Evolution of End-to-End Solution (2)
    • 4.3.19 Evolution of End-to-End Solution (3)
  • 4.4 Neta Auto
    • 4.4.1 R&D Layout
    • 4.4.2 Development History of Autonomous Driving
    • 4.4.3 Autonomous Driving Strategy: Hozon Strategy 1.0
    • 4.4.4 Autonomous Driving Strategy: Hozon Strategy 2.0
    • 4.4.5 NETA PILOT
    • 4.4.6 NETA PILOT 3.0/4.0
    • 4.4.7 Advanced Function Release Plan of NETA PILOT 3.0/4.0
    • 4.4.8 NNP & NCP
    • 4.4.9 Parking Functions: NTP & NMS
    • 4.4.10 Suppliers of Intelligent Driving Parts
    • 4.4.11 Important Suppliers
    • 4.4.12 Development Trends of Intelligent Driving
  • 4.5 Leapmotor
    • 4.5.1 Intelligent Driving Evolution
    • 4.5.2 Intelligent Driving Configuration of Models
    • 4.5.3 Leapmotor Pilot
    • 4.5.4 Establishes Intelligent Technology Research Institute
    • 4.5.5 Intelligent Driving Domain Configuration of the Four Leaf Clover EEA
    • 4.5.6 Technology Layout (1)
    • 4.5.7 Technology Layout (2)
    • 4.5.8 Suppliers
    • 4.5.9 Intelligent Driving Highlights of Leapmotor C16
  • 4.6 Xiaomi Auto
    • 4.6.1 Intelligent Driving Development History
    • 4.6.2 Intelligent Driving Achievements of Xiaomi Pilot
    • 4.6.3 Xiaomi Pilot Is Divided into Two Versions
    • 4.6.4 Xiaomi Pilot Self-developed Intelligent Driving Algorithm
    • 4.6.5 Xiaomi SU7: Intelligent Driving Highlights
    • 4.6.6 Xiaomi SU7 Applied End-to-End Foundation Model
    • 4.6.7 Investments in Automotive Field
  • 4.7 HIMA (Harmony lntelligent Mobility Alliance)
    • 4.7.1 ADAS Evolution
    • 4.7.2 Development History of Intelligent Driving Business
    • 4.7.3 ADS1.0 to ADS3.0
    • 4.7.4 Release of ADS2.0 in 2023
    • 4.7.5 ADS2.0, a Generation Ahead in Functional Safety
    • 4.7.6 ADS2.0: Intelligent Parking Capability
    • 4.7.7 ADS 2.0-enabled Models and Price
    • 4.7.8 ADS 2.0-enabled Models (1)
    • 4.7.9 ADS 2.0-enabled Models (2)
    • 4.7.10 ADS 2.0-enabled Models (3)
    • 4.7.11 ADS3.0 to Be Released in 2024
    • 4.7.12 ADS3.0 All-round Active Safety Upgrade
    • 4.7.13 ADS3.0 Smart Parking
    • 4.7.14 Touring Platform Prepares for ADS3.0 Upgrade to L3 Intelligent Driving Compliance on the Road
    • 4.7.15 ADS SE
    • 4.7.16 Collaborative AVP Smart Parking Solution